From: "Blair Trewin" <B.Tre...@bom.gov.au>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 22:40:43 +1000
Local: Mon, May 5 2008 10:40 pm
Subject: RE: [austpacwx] Re: Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
The 17th and 18th centuries were certainly significantly colder in northern Europe than the first half of the 20th (although the limited evidence available suggests this wasn't matched in the Southern Hemisphere). However, I wouldn't read anything into freezing of the Thames - the main reason it doesn't freeze now is because of warm water flowing into it from the drains of urban London (bridge configurations have also been important). It would certainly have frozen in 1962-63 - the coldest winter since 1740 - under 18th-century urban conditions, and probably in a number of subsequent winters too (like 1987). I could document all the fallacies, factual flaws and misleading extrapolations in the Chapman article, but I've got better things to do with a couple of hours, and in any case David Karoly's already done it at www.onlineopinion.com.au. Blair -----Original Message-----
From: austpacwx@googlegroups.com on behalf of Dennis Cottle Sent: Mon 05/05/2008 20:29 To: austpacwx@googlegroups.com Subject: [austpacwx] Re: Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh Correct Tony > At 06:11 AM 5/5/2008, you wrote: >>Phil Chapman is a geophysicist and astronautical engineer who lives >><http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=7295&page=1>http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=7295&page=1 > Certainly a correlation between sunspot numbers and climate change > The last sunspots seen several weeks ago were lingering Cycle 23 > 73 de VK3JED You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||