Tuquiri won't be the test case, but sooner, rather than later, the NRL will have a restraint of trade action brought against it and will suffer a very public loss. Although Gallop will have to fall on his sword, suspect he will be well rewarded for being the News Ltd 'bunny' all those years I suspect
> Tuquiri won't be the test case, but sooner, rather than later, the NRL > will have a restraint of trade action brought against it and will suffer a > very public loss. Although Gallop will have to fall on his sword, suspect > he will be well rewarded for being the News Ltd 'bunny' all those years I > suspect
What restraint of trade are you talking about? There is no restraint of trade. If you don't like what you are being paid, you move to somewhere that will pay more. It's called life.
>> Tuquiri won't be the test case, but sooner, rather than later, the NRL >> will have a restraint of trade action brought against it and will suffer >> a very public loss. Although Gallop will have to fall on his sword, >> suspect he will be well rewarded for being the News Ltd 'bunny' all those >> years I suspect
> What restraint of trade are you talking about? There is no restraint of > trade. If you don't like what you are being paid, you move to somewhere > that will pay more. It's called life.
I really despair at the human condition sometimes. I know your'e a Qld'er Coops, but you could at least try and familiarise yourself, even a little, with the subject matter.
>>> Tuquiri won't be the test case, but sooner, rather than later, the NRL >>> will have a restraint of trade action brought against it and will suffer >>> a very public loss. Although Gallop will have to fall on his sword, >>> suspect he will be well rewarded for being the News Ltd 'bunny' all >>> those years I suspect
>> What restraint of trade are you talking about? There is no restraint of >> trade. If you don't like what you are being paid, you move to somewhere >> that will pay more. It's called life.
> I really despair at the human condition sometimes. I know your'e a Qld'er > Coops, > but you could at least try and familiarise yourself, even a little, with > the subject > matter.
>>> Tuquiri won't be the test case, but sooner, rather than later, the NRL >>> will have a restraint of trade action brought against it and will suffer >>> a very public loss. Although Gallop will have to fall on his sword, >>> suspect he will be well rewarded for being the News Ltd 'bunny' all >>> those years I suspect
>> What restraint of trade are you talking about? There is no restraint of >> trade. If you don't like what you are being paid, you move to somewhere >> that will pay more. It's called life.
> I really despair at the human condition sometimes. I know your'e a Qld'er > Coops, > but you could at least try and familiarise yourself, even a little, with > the subject > matter.
Where is the restraint of trade? Lote plays under the NRL rules - he doesn't have to come back to RL - he can continue to play union or pull himself. I think the precedent was with Benji - what is it with your bunch of no-hopers at the Tigers? First Benji, now Lote. Trying to play by your own rules?
>>>> Tuquiri won't be the test case, but sooner, rather than later, the NRL >>>> will have a restraint of trade action brought against it and will >>>> suffer a very public loss. Although Gallop will have to fall on his >>>> sword, suspect he will be well rewarded for being the News Ltd 'bunny' >>>> all those years I suspect
>>> What restraint of trade are you talking about? There is no restraint of >>> trade. If you don't like what you are being paid, you move to somewhere >>> that will pay more. It's called life.
>> I really despair at the human condition sometimes. I know your'e a Qld'er >> Coops, >> but you could at least try and familiarise yourself, even a little, with >> the subject >> matter.
> Where is the restraint of trade? Lote plays under the NRL rules - he > doesn't have to come back to RL - he can continue to play union or pull > himself. I think the precedent was with Benji - what is it with your bunch > of no-hopers at the Tigers? First Benji, now Lote. Trying to play by your > own rules?
>> Viper
If I had the time, or indeed if I could be bothered, I'd arrange a 5 year old to walk you through it Herr Welcher
|
