Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Premiership medals to all players, not just the 22
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Gor  
View profile  
 More options Sep 25 2003, 1:02 pm
Newsgroups: aus.sport.aussie-rules
From: "Gor" <n...@email.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:02:45 +1000
Local: Thurs, Sep 25 2003 1:02 pm
Subject: Re: Premiership medals to all players, not just the 22
its nuthin but a fukin disgrace

"Peter Ballard" <pball...@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message

news:9d5509fa.0309241828.4f01560f@posting.google.com...
> G'day all,

> I posted a similar thing in 1999 (re. Jason McCartney) and now seems a
> good time to toss it in again with the Rocca thing (though I think
> Brisbane will win).

> IMHO, Premiership medals should go to every player at the club who
> took the field during the year. This notion that only the 22 on GF day
> are "Premiership players" is just ridiculous. All players contribute
> to premiership success, not just those who are in the 22 on GF day.

> On Monday night, Eddie called Ricciuto a "1998 premiership player".
> That annoyed me. Roo was injured for the 1997 finals, but he was a big
> part of Adelaide getting there. In fact he was one of Adelaide's 2
> all-Australians in 1997. The other was Tony Modra, who did his knee in
> the Prelim. Ricciuto at least got to play the 1998 GF. Modra (like
> McCartney, and possibly Rocca) was a huge part of his team's
> Premiership success but has no medal to show for it. It's a joke that
> relative hacks like A.Keating, Rintoul and Sampson are "Premiership
> Players" because they happened to be fit on GF day in 1997, yet Modra
> is not.

> The usual argument is that giving more medals devalues the Premiership
> medal, or that those outside the 22 didn't contribute on the day. I
> disagree. Hey, if we only give medals to those who only contribute on
> the day, why not take a few more away? IIRC, David Pittman was on the
> bench for all of Adelaide's 2nd half comeback in 1998. No (1998) medal
> for him then? And ditto Rod Jamieson who was injured in the opening
> minutes in 1997? (My Crows bias is coming through here, I'm sure
> there's examples from other clubs).

> I haven't noticed anyone complain that the Brownlow is devalued now
> that it is awarded to those who "lose" the tie-break. And I'm sure no
> "Premiership Players" will begrudge Premiership medals to teammates
> who, for whatever reason, didn't happen to be in the team on GF day.

> If Collingwood win on Saturday, it'd be great if Rocca could still
> come up and get a medal. Cause he'd have contributed a lot more to the
> Premiership than lots of the players on the day.

> --
> Regards,

> Peter Ballard
> Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
> pball...@ozemail.com.au
> http://www.ozemail.com.au/~pballard/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google