> October was a tumultuous time for Geert Wilders, leader of the Dutch Freedom > Party (PVV) in the Hague Parliament. Dutch public opinion polls show Wilders > and the PVV in the lead position in any future Parliamentary election. The > PVV is currently the leading Dutch party in the European Parliament. After > the next elections, Wilders might be in a position to form a ruling > coalition in Holland as Prime Minister. What sets Wilders apart from most EU > political leaders is his ringing support of America and Israel. He considers > Israel's embattled position in the Middle East as fighting for all of us. As > he says in his speeches: "we all are Israel."
> His courageous stand against encroaching Islamization in his native Holland > and the EU was emboldened by a recent decision of a British Immigration > Tribunal that overturned a decision by disgraced former U.K. Home Secretary, > Jacquie Smith. Smith had barred his entry at London's Heathrow Airport in > February on the specious grounds that his presence at a private showing of > the controversial film Fitna at the House of Lords arranged by Lord Malcolm > Pearson and Baroness Carolyn Cox would somehow disrupt, "community harmony." > Wilders' British lawyer who argued his case successfully before the > Immigration Tribunal is a former Muslim who left Islam. Wilders is scheduled > to return to the House of Lords venue in March, 2010 to show Fitna. Wilders > has shown Fitna in the US Capitol Building in Washington, DC and to > audiences across America in California, Florida and New York. In November, > he travels to Prague to show Fitna in the Senate of the Czech Republic.
> Wilders took a well deserved victory lap in London and at a press conference > arranged by Lord Pearson re-affirmed that free speech in Western democracies > is a paramount bedrock value
> Wilders sprinted for the US following the London meetings for a full week of > appearances in both Philadelphia and New York. These included events at > Temple University and the Union League Club in Philadelphia organized by the > David Horowitz Freedom Center. In New York, Wilders spoke at the Harvard > Club which was arranged by the Hudson Institute and at Columbia University > (CU) and sponsored by the CU College Republicans and a faculty group, the CU > Chapter of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East.
> Controversy concerning his appearances in both venues in America persisted. > At Temple University attempts were made by the Muslim Students Association > to force administrators to cancel the event on the grounds that Wilders' > criticism of Islam causes "disruption of community harmony" - the same > rationale used to bar Wilders from Britain that was overturned by the > British court system. Criticism of religion is considered protected speech > under US Constitution First Amendment provisions. Fortunately, the courage > of a campus sponsoring group, Temple Purpose, to press ahead on free speech > grounds enabled Wilders' appearance. In the wake of his appearance at > Columbia University, the student newspaper The Spectator, published an > opinion piece, "Wild, Wild Wilders," by, Adel Elsohly the graduate student > adviser to the local Muslim Students Association chapter. Elsohly wrote: > "Today we call on everyone, not as Muslims, members of a cultural group or a > University, but as humans, to ask him - or herself with all sincerity: Don't > we all deserve freedom from fear?"
> Essentially, Elsohly was arguing that "freedom from fear" trumped "free > speech." It was left to a prominent American apostate, Mohamed Asghar, > co-founder of Former Muslims United to rebut this logic and in the process > defend Wilders views on the threat of Islamization:
> I agree that all humans deserve freedom from fear, including the one that > emanates from a religion, called Islam. It calls upon its adherents to kill > all those who do not believe in Allah, Muhammad and the Day of Judgment. > Consequently, most non-Muslims, who have understood Islam and its teaching, > remain in constant fear of being executed by its followers, whenever the > former find themselves among the latter.
> To put into practice what Muslims preach and claim about the mankind's right > to be free from fear; can we ask the Muslims to remove from the Quran those > passages, which require them to kill the Non-Believers and to convert them > to Islam by persuasion or force, or to eliminate them from the face of the > earth?
> Gordon: What was your professional background before you entered Dutch > politics?
> Wilders: I worked for the Dutch social insurance agency before I entered > politics, where I first worked as a speechwriter for the liberal People's > Party for Freedom and Democracy. In 1997, I was elected in the city council > of Utrecht, one of the larger cities in the Netherlands.
> Gordon: How long have you been a member of The Hague Parliament?
> Wilders: I have been a member of the Dutch Parliament for more than 11 years > now.
> Gordon: When do you form the Freedom Party?
> Wilders: I left the liberal People's Party for Freedom and Democracy in > 2004, due to many irreconcilable differences, amongst which was the party's > position on Turkish accession to the European Union, to form my own party.
> Gordon: How extensive have been your travels to Israel and the Middle East? > Did that experience lead to your defense of Israel?
> Wilders: As a young man, I traveled extensively through the Middle East, > including Iran, and lived in Israel for two years. Israel is a beacon of > light in an area - the Middle East - that is pitch black everywhere else. > Israel is a Western democracy, while Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Egypt are > medieval dictatorships. The so-called 'Middle East conflict' is not about > land at all. It is a conflict about ideologies; a battle between Islam and > freedom. It is not about some land in Gaza or in Judea and Samaria. It is > about Jihad. To Islam the whole of Israel is occupied territory. Islam > forces Israel to fight and Israel is not just fighting for itself. Israel is > fighting for all of us, for the entire West. Israel is fighting the jihad > that is meant for all of us. So we should all defend Israel. We all are > Israel.
> Gordon: What knowledge did you acquire from your readings and travels about > Islam and its doctrine towards unbelievers?
> Wilders: Islam is a totalitarian ideology, a doctrine of hate, and it is not > difficult to find in the Quran what Muslims are expected to do with > unbelievers: they are to be killed. Just look at Surah 4 verse 56, or Surah > 47 verse 4, to name a few.
> Gordon:What were the transforming events in Holland and the EU that led you > to take a stand against Islamization?
> Wilders: The encroachment of Islam on everyday life in the Netherlands and > Europe is very significant. Mosques and burqas are popping up everywhere you > look, gays and women are regularly harassed on the streets of our main > cities. That creeping Islamization is what we have to fear most, because > every mosque, every Islamic school, every burqa is regarded by many Muslims > as a building block towards a larger goal, towards domination. In order to > preserve our freedom, our democratic society and our civil rights, it is > vital that we stop the Islamization immediately.
> Gordon: You have espoused bans on the Quranic canon as 'hate texts'. How has > that been received by the Dutch non-Muslim and Muslim populations?
> Wilders: My Freedom Party was the winner in the recent elections for the > European Parliament. Right now, in the polls, we in fact are leading. If > there would be elections in the Netherlands tomorrow, I could very well > become the next Prime Minister.
> Gordon: Why do you advocate restrictions on Muslim immigration in both > Holland and the EU?
> Wilders: We have to stop the mass immigration from Muslim countries simply > because more Islam means less freedom.
> Gordon: Why did you produce the film, Fitna?
> Wilders: I felt I had the moral duty to educate people about Islam and the > Islamization of Europe. The duty to make clear to everyone that the Koran > stands at the heart of what some people call terrorism but is in reality > Jihad. I wanted to show that the problems of Islam are at the core of Islam, > and do not belong to its fringes. I have warned against the dangers of the > Koran and Islam in numerous interviews, opinion articles, speeches and of > course parliamentary debates, but pictures often say more than words. That > is why I made Fitna.
> Gordon: Were you surprised by the intense reactions of Dutch Muslims and > Muslims throughout the umma?
> Wilders: Actually, the reactions of Muslims, in particular Muslims in the > Netherlands, were relatively mild. It was mainly cultural relativists that > threw a fit over it. Also, there were some Muslims protesting in > Afghanistan, Pakistan and Indonesia who were burning dolls depicting me and > shouting terrible things.
> Gordon: Why has a Kingdom of Jordan Court issued a warrant for your arrest?
> Wilders: Because of Fitna, Jordan threatens to prosecute me for blasphemy, > demeaning Islam and slandering the Prophet Muhammad; violations of the > Jordanian Penal Code, even though the alleged violations did not even occur > in Jordan. As you know, Jordan is a non-democratic country, without an > independent or impartial judicial system and without a strongly developed > civil society. Jordan's attempt to prosecute me is an infringement on the > sovereignty of my country, the Netherlands. It is an infringement on freedom > of speech. Jordan's attempt is in fact a hostile act towards freedom itself.
> Gordon: You have been under 24/7 protection by the Queen's Royal Protective > Service in Holland for over four years. What triggered it and how has it > disrupted your family
<andxor...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Nov 5, 3:57 am, "Heinrich" <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote: >> October was a tumultuous time for Geert Wilders, leader of the Dutch Freedom >> Party (PVV) in the Hague Parliament. Dutch public opinion polls show Wilders >> and the PVV in the lead position in any future Parliamentary election. The >> PVV is currently the leading Dutch party in the European Parliament. After >> the next elections, Wilders might be in a position to form a ruling >> coalition in Holland as Prime Minister. What sets Wilders apart from most EU >> political leaders is his ringing support of America and Israel. He considers >> Israel's embattled position in the Middle East as fighting for all of us. As >> he says in his speeches: "we all are Israel."
>> His courageous stand against encroaching Islamization in his native Holland >> and the EU was emboldened by a recent decision of a British Immigration >> Tribunal that overturned a decision by disgraced former U.K. Home Secretary, >> Jacquie Smith. Smith had barred his entry at London's Heathrow Airport in >> February on the specious grounds that his presence at a private showing of >> the controversial film Fitna at the House of Lords arranged by Lord Malcolm >> Pearson and Baroness Carolyn Cox would somehow disrupt, "community harmony." >> Wilders' British lawyer who argued his case successfully before the >> Immigration Tribunal is a former Muslim who left Islam. Wilders is scheduled >> to return to the House of Lords venue in March, 2010 to show Fitna. Wilders >> has shown Fitna in the US Capitol Building in Washington, DC and to >> audiences across America in California, Florida and New York. In November, >> he travels to Prague to show Fitna in the Senate of the Czech Republic.
>> Wilders took a well deserved victory lap in London and at a press conference >> arranged by Lord Pearson re-affirmed that free speech in Western democracies >> is a paramount bedrock value
>> Wilders sprinted for the US following the London meetings for a full week of >> appearances in both Philadelphia and New York. These included events at >> Temple University and the Union League Club in Philadelphia organized by the >> David Horowitz Freedom Center. In New York, Wilders spoke at the Harvard >> Club which was arranged by the Hudson Institute and at Columbia University >> (CU) and sponsored by the CU College Republicans and a faculty group, the CU >> Chapter of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East.
>> Controversy concerning his appearances in both venues in America persisted. >> At Temple University attempts were made by the Muslim Students Association >> to force administrators to cancel the event on the grounds that Wilders' >> criticism of Islam causes "disruption of community harmony" - the same >> rationale used to bar Wilders from Britain that was overturned by the >> British court system. Criticism of religion is considered protected speech >> under US Constitution First Amendment provisions. Fortunately, the courage >> of a campus sponsoring group, Temple Purpose, to press ahead on free speech >> grounds enabled Wilders' appearance. In the wake of his appearance at >> Columbia University, the student newspaper The Spectator, published an >> opinion piece, "Wild, Wild Wilders," by, Adel Elsohly the graduate student >> adviser to the local Muslim Students Association chapter. Elsohly wrote: >> "Today we call on everyone, not as Muslims, members of a cultural group or a >> University, but as humans, to ask him - or herself with all sincerity: Don't >> we all deserve freedom from fear?"
>> Essentially, Elsohly was arguing that "freedom from fear" trumped "free >> speech." It was left to a prominent American apostate, Mohamed Asghar, >> co-founder of Former Muslims United to rebut this logic and in the process >> defend Wilders views on the threat of Islamization:
>> I agree that all humans deserve freedom from fear, including the one that >> emanates from a religion, called Islam. It calls upon its adherents to kill >> all those who do not believe in Allah, Muhammad and the Day of Judgment. >> Consequently, most non-Muslims, who have understood Islam and its teaching, >> remain in constant fear of being executed by its followers, whenever the >> former find themselves among the latter.
>> To put into practice what Muslims preach and claim about the mankind's right >> to be free from fear; can we ask the Muslims to remove from the Quran those >> passages, which require them to kill the Non-Believers and to convert them >> to Islam by persuasion or force, or to eliminate them from the face of the >> earth?
>> Gordon: What was your professional background before you entered Dutch >> politics?
>> Wilders: I worked for the Dutch social insurance agency before I entered >> politics, where I first worked as a speechwriter for the liberal People's >> Party for Freedom and Democracy. In 1997, I was elected in the city council >> of Utrecht, one of the larger cities in the Netherlands.
>> Gordon: How long have you been a member of The Hague Parliament?
>> Wilders: I have been a member of the Dutch Parliament for more than 11 years >> now.
>> Gordon: When do you form the Freedom Party?
>> Wilders: I left the liberal People's Party for Freedom and Democracy in >> 2004, due to many irreconcilable differences, amongst which was the party's >> position on Turkish accession to the European Union, to form my own party.
>> Gordon: How extensive have been your travels to Israel and the Middle East? >> Did that experience lead to your defense of Israel?
>> Wilders: As a young man, I traveled extensively through the Middle East, >> including Iran, and lived in Israel for two years. Israel is a beacon of >> light in an area - the Middle East - that is pitch black everywhere else. >> Israel is a Western democracy, while Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Egypt are >> medieval dictatorships. The so-called 'Middle East conflict' is not about >> land at all. It is a conflict about ideologies; a battle between Islam and >> freedom. It is not about some land in Gaza or in Judea and Samaria. It is >> about Jihad. To Islam the whole of Israel is occupied territory. Islam >> forces Israel to fight and Israel is not just fighting for itself. Israel is >> fighting for all of us, for the entire West. Israel is fighting the jihad >> that is meant for all of us. So we should all defend Israel. We all are >> Israel.
>> Gordon: What knowledge did you acquire from your readings and travels about >> Islam and its doctrine towards unbelievers?
>> Wilders: Islam is a totalitarian ideology, a doctrine of hate, and it is not >> difficult to find in the Quran what Muslims are expected to do with >> unbelievers: they are to be killed. Just look at Surah 4 verse 56, or Surah >> 47 verse 4, to name a few.
>> Gordon:What were the transforming events in Holland and the EU that led you >> to take a stand against Islamization?
>> Wilders: The encroachment of Islam on everyday life in the Netherlands and >> Europe is very significant. Mosques and burqas are popping up everywhere you >> look, gays and women are regularly harassed on the streets of our main >> cities. That creeping Islamization is what we have to fear most, because >> every mosque, every Islamic school, every burqa is regarded by many Muslims >> as a building block towards a larger goal, towards domination. In order to >> preserve our freedom, our democratic society and our civil rights, it is >> vital that we stop the Islamization immediately.
>> Gordon: You have espoused bans on the Quranic canon as 'hate texts'. How has >> that been received by the Dutch non-Muslim and Muslim populations?
>> Wilders: My Freedom Party was the winner in the recent elections for the >> European Parliament. Right now, in the polls, we in fact are leading. If >> there would be elections in the Netherlands tomorrow, I could very well >> become the next Prime Minister.
>> Gordon: Why do you advocate restrictions on Muslim immigration in both >> Holland and the EU?
>> Wilders: We have to stop the mass immigration from Muslim countries simply >> because more Islam means less freedom.
>> Gordon: Why did you produce the film, Fitna?
>> Wilders: I felt I had the moral duty to educate people about Islam and the >> Islamization of Europe. The duty to make clear to everyone that the Koran >> stands at the heart of what some people call terrorism but is in reality >> Jihad. I wanted to show that the problems of Islam are at the core of Islam, >> and do not belong to its fringes. I have warned against the dangers of the >> Koran and Islam in numerous interviews, opinion articles, speeches and of >> course parliamentary debates, but pictures often say more than words. That >> is why I made Fitna.
>> Gordon: Were you surprised by the intense reactions of Dutch Muslims and >> Muslims throughout the umma?
>> Wilders: Actually, the reactions of Muslims, in particular Muslims in the >> Netherlands, were relatively mild. It was mainly cultural relativists that >> threw a fit over it. Also, there were some Muslims protesting in >> Afghanistan, Pakistan and Indonesia who were burning dolls depicting me and >> shouting terrible things.
>> Gordon: Why has a Kingdom of Jordan Court issued a warrant for your arrest?
>> Wilders: Because of Fitna, Jordan threatens to prosecute me for blasphemy, >> demeaning Islam and slandering the Prophet Muhammad; violations of the >> Jordanian Penal Code, even though the alleged violations did not even occur >> in Jordan. As you know, Jordan is a non-democratic country, without an >> independent or impartial judicial system and without a strongly developed >> civil society. Jordan's attempt to prosecute me is an infringement on the >> sovereignty of my country, the Netherlands. It is an infringement on freedom >> of
"t was Ganley who offered illumination in the debate. He produced a book Cohn-Bendit had published in 1975, and read out Cohn-Bendit's account from it of how he had worked in a kindergarten and allowed the children to pull down the zip on his trousers and touch his penis. In the book, he said he had asked them why they did not play with each other -- but in the end he 'caressed' them, too.
At that, Dany put on a performance of glee, whooping that he had just won €500 because he had bet someone that Ganley would read that out. When Cohn-Bendit's younger supporters in the room did not give him quite the round of applause he seemed to be looking for with that reply, he changed tack and insisted that all this in the book had been discussed in France and Germany years ago and had never raised any concerns. Indeed, he said, the parents of the children said they had no concerns.
'And the children, what did they say?' asked Ganley. The Red assured him and the audience that years later they had all said their time at the school was extremely happy. And then he went on about how the times were different then."
> October was a tumultuous time for Geert Wilders, leader of the Dutch > Freedom > Party (PVV) in the Hague Parliament. Dutch public opinion polls show > Wilders > and the PVV in the lead position in any future Parliamentary election. The > PVV is currently the leading Dutch party in the European Parliament. After > the next elections, Wilders might be in a position to form a ruling > coalition in Holland as Prime Minister. What sets Wilders apart from most > EU > political leaders is his ringing support of America and Israel. He > considers > Israel's embattled position in the Middle East as fighting for all of us. > As > he says in his speeches: "we all are Israel."
SO WHAT IS HE? JEWISH? YOU MEAN THE PRICKS THAT TUN DOWN UNARMED GIRLS AND SPECIALIZE IN SHOOTING AND BOMBING WOMEN AND CHILDREN. ANDDOES THIS IDIOT BACK THE SHILD PORN ANDUSE OF NON JEWISH SEX SLAVES. SI WHAT IS THE PRICK JEWISH? OR A TRAITOR TO ALL NON JEWS? ANOTHER JUDAS GOAT?
NOT ONE GAME IN FRANCE OR AMERICA - THANK CHRIST FOR ITALY.
FRANCE AND AMERICA, COULD HAVE A JEW/ZIONIST/ISRAELI UP EM SINGING HALLELUJA IN THEIR RIGHT EAR AND RING A SCHOOL BELL IN THEIR LEFT EAR AND THEY WOULD BE STANDING THERE SAYING WHAT JEW.
AND APPARENTLY THEY WOUKD NOT KNOW THAT THERE WAS A JEW UP EM SINGING HALLELUJA IN THEIR RIGHT EAR AND RINGING A SCHOOL BELL IN THE LEFT THEY ARE SO TAMED AND BRAIN WASHED.
Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story up, but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes from the films live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11 million Italian viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives responsible, claiming they were spreading "blood libel." http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/snuffporn.htm
Jewish gangsters in Russia have become increasingly linked to traffic in "white slaves" and prostitutes through Israel, according to a recent report in the Jerusalem Post. Israel turns an official blind eye to forced prostitution, and does not punish Israeli citizens who choose to own "sex slaves", as long as the slaves are foreign and non-Jews.
JEWISH BULLYBOYS BEATING UP HISTORIANS AND THE FRENCH ARE PANICKED ABOUT A PAEDO RAPIST BEING ARRESTED? THEY OUGHT TO GET OF THEIR KEISTER AND CHECK OUT WHO IS BEATING UP 80 YEAR OLDS.
Immigration: The Full Story of the Immigrants Who Opened the Floodgates
The Culture of Critique reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
In The Culture of Critique, Evolutionary Psychologist Professor Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th century intellectual movements - largely established and led by Jews - have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.
The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald's massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation and its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series is written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.
The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi- culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty - that while claiming to be working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others.
Celebrating Diversity
Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and diversity - but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.
Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands for years - even without a country - has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald's view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman: "American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief - one firmly rooted in history - that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our- strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept. Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country but because it is good for the Jews.
Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate anyway. His reason? "I'd rather live in a country governed by the faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the Republican convention." This man apparently distrusts white gentiles and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good for the country.
Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the
...
> October was a tumultuous time for Geert Wilders, leader of the Dutch > Freedom > Party (PVV) in the Hague Parliament. Dutch public opinion polls show > Wilders > and the PVV in the lead position in any future Parliamentary election. The > PVV is currently the leading Dutch party in the European Parliament. After > the next elections, Wilders might be in a position to form a ruling > coalition in Holland as Prime Minister. What sets Wilders apart from most > EU > political leaders is his ringing support of America and Israel. He > considers > Israel's embattled position in the Middle East as fighting for all of us. > As > he says in his speeches: "we all are Israel."
SO WHAT IS HE? JEWISH? YOU MEAN THE PRICKS THAT TUN DOWN UNARMED GIRLS AND SPECIALIZE IN SHOOTING AND BOMBING WOMEN AND CHILDREN. ANDDOES THIS IDIOT BACK THE SHILD PORN ANDUSE OF NON JEWISH SEX SLAVES. SI WHAT IS THE PRICK JEWISH? OR A TRAITOR TO ALL NON JEWS? ANOTHER JUDAS GOAT?
NOT ONE GAME IN FRANCE OR AMERICA - THANK CHRIST FOR ITALY.
FRANCE AND AMERICA, COULD HAVE A JEW/ZIONIST/ISRAELI UP EM SINGING HALLELUJA IN THEIR RIGHT EAR AND RING A SCHOOL BELL IN THEIR LEFT EAR AND THEY WOULD BE STANDING THERE SAYING WHAT JEW.
AND APPARENTLY THEY WOUKD NOT KNOW THAT THERE WAS A JEW UP EM SINGING HALLELUJA IN THEIR RIGHT EAR AND RINGING A SCHOOL BELL IN THE LEFT THEY ARE SO TAMED AND BRAIN WASHED.
Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story up, but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes from the films live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11 million Italian viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives responsible, claiming they were spreading "blood libel." http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/snuffporn.htm
Jewish gangsters in Russia have become increasingly linked to traffic in "white slaves" and prostitutes through Israel, according to a recent report in the Jerusalem Post. Israel turns an official blind eye to forced prostitution, and does not punish Israeli citizens who choose to own "sex slaves", as long as the slaves are foreign and non-Jews.
JEWISH BULLYBOYS BEATING UP HISTORIANS AND THE FRENCH ARE PANICKED ABOUT A PAEDO RAPIST BEING ARRESTED? THEY OUGHT TO GET OF THEIR KEISTER AND CHECK OUT WHO IS BEATING UP 80 YEAR OLDS.
Immigration: The Full Story of the Immigrants Who Opened the Floodgates
The Culture of Critique reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
In The Culture of Critique, Evolutionary Psychologist Professor Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th century intellectual movements - largely established and led by Jews - have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.
The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald's massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation and its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series is written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.
The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi- culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty - that while claiming to be working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others.
Celebrating Diversity
Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and diversity - but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.
Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands for years - even without a country - has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald's view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman: "American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief - one firmly rooted in history - that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our- strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept. Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country but because it is good for the Jews.
Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate anyway. His reason? "I'd rather live in a country governed by the faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the Republican convention." This man apparently distrusts white gentiles and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good for the country.
Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that
...
cornholio wrote: > On Nov 5, 3:57 am, "Heinrich" <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
... >> Wilders: As a young man, I traveled extensively through the Middle East, >> including Iran, and lived in Israel for two years. Israel is a beacon of >> light in an area - the Middle East - that is pitch black everywhere else. >> Israel is a Western democracy, while Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Egypt are >> medieval dictatorships. The so-called 'Middle East conflict' is not about >> land at all. It is a conflict about ideologies; a battle between Islam and >> freedom. It is not about some land in Gaza or in Judea and Samaria. It is >> about Jihad. To Islam the whole of Israel is occupied territory. Islam >> forces Israel to fight and Israel is not just fighting for itself. Israel is >> fighting for all of us, for the entire West. Israel is fighting the jihad >> that is meant for all of us. So we should all defend Israel. We all are >> Israel.
> "cornholio" <andxor...@gmail.com> wrote > news:123bdabc-a76f-4774-bb74-74aecba90168@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > "Heinrich" <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote: >> October was a tumultuous time for Geert >> Wilders, leader of the Dutch Freedom..... > Jewish officials then fired the executives responsible, > claiming they were spreading "blood libel" linked to > traffic in "white slaves" and prostitutes through Israel, > according to a recent report Israel turns an official > blind eye to forced prostitution, and does not punish > Israeli citizens who choose to own "sex slaves", as > long as the slaves are foreign and non-Jews. > http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/snuffporn.htm
Too bad we'll never be able to find out whether they think it is better to be a sex slave, than to live a life void of sex.... -- _____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~ ___________________________________________________ --
mose wrote: > "cornholio" <andxor...@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:123bdabc-a76f-4774-bb74-74aecba90168@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 5, 3:57 am, "Heinrich" <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote: >> October was a tumultuous time for Geert Wilders, leader of the Dutch >> Freedom >> Party (PVV) in the Hague Parliament. Dutch public opinion polls show >> Wilders >> and the PVV in the lead position in any future Parliamentary election. The >> PVV is currently the leading Dutch party in the European Parliament. After >> the next elections, Wilders might be in a position to form a ruling >> coalition in Holland as Prime Minister. What sets Wilders apart from most >> EU >> political leaders is his ringing support of America and Israel. He >> considers >> Israel's embattled position in the Middle East as fighting for all of us. >> As >> he says in his speeches: "we all are Israel."
> SO WHAT IS HE? JEWISH? YOU MEAN THE PRICKS THAT TUN DOWN UNARMED GIRLS AND > SPECIALIZE IN SHOOTING AND BOMBING WOMEN AND CHILDREN. > ANDDOES THIS IDIOT BACK THE SHILD PORN ANDUSE OF NON JEWISH SEX SLAVES. > SI WHAT IS THE PRICK JEWISH? OR A TRAITOR TO ALL NON JEWS? ANOTHER JUDAS > GOAT?
Now here's a man who doesn't know which side he's on...
Or, more likely, he does but he doesn't like it...
-- William Black
"Any number under six"
The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single handed with a quarterstaff.
>> Fanatical Muzzies are like Hitler they want to kill Jews. >> God Bless Israel and the final victory as predicted in Revelations.
> You utter twat, "Adrian".
WELL IF YOU ARE JEWISH YOU ARE A CLEVER LITTLE FELLA, IF NOT? IT'S CALLED CUTTING YOUR OWN THROAT.
http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/snuffporn.htm Three Russian Jews and eight Italian Jews were arrested after police discovered they had been kidnapping non-Jewish children between the ages of two and five years from Russian orphanages, raping the children, and then murdering them on film. Mostly non-Jewish customers, including 1,700 nationwide, 600 in Italy, and an unknown number in the United States, paid as much as $20,000 per film to watch little children being raped and murdered.
THEY MURDER NON JEWISH CITIZENS WITH IMPUNITY? ACTUALLY RUBBING ENGLISH FAMILIES NOSES IN THE INJUSTICE.
Hurndall, age 21, from Machester, England, had been standing between Israeli troops and Palestinian children when Israeli soldiers opened fire, according to a fellow activist from the International Solidarity Movement who witnessed the scene.(AP Photo/Khalil Hamra)
Immigration: The Full Story of the Immigrants Who Opened the Floodgates
The Culture of Critique reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
In The Culture of Critique, Evolutionary Psychologist Professor Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th century intellectual movements - largely established and led by Jews - have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.
The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald's massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation and its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series is written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.
The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi- culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty - that while claiming to be working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others.
Celebrating Diversity
Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and diversity - but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.
Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands for years - even without a country - has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald's view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman: "American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief - one firmly rooted in history - that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our- strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept. Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country but because it is good for the Jews.
Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate anyway. His reason? "I'd rather live in a country governed by the faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the Republican convention." This man apparently distrusts white gentiles and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good for the country.
Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority, he writes, "We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country." He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews. This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and influence.
In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, "We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible..." - just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement of European culture also irreversible.
Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof. MacDonald reports that he and his followers - with the notable exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict - were all Jews with strong Jewish identities: "Jewish identification and the pursuit of perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating
...
>>> Fanatical Muzzies are like Hitler they want to kill Jews. >>> God Bless Israel and the final victory as predicted in Revelations. >> You utter twat, "Adrian". > WELL IF YOU ARE JEWISH YOU ARE A CLEVER LITTLE FELLA, IF NOT? IT'S CALLED > CUTTING YOUR OWN THROAT.
Q. In which Middle-eastern country are Arab women treated as equals, allowed to vote and an education?
>>>> Fanatical Muzzies are like Hitler they want to kill Jews. >>>> God Bless Israel and the final victory as predicted in Revelations. >>> You utter twat, "Adrian". >> WELL IF YOU ARE JEWISH YOU ARE A CLEVER LITTLE FELLA, IF NOT? IT'S CALLED >> CUTTING YOUR OWN THROAT.
> Q. In which Middle-eastern country are Arab women treated as equals, > allowed to vote and an education?
I BELIEVE THAT IS THE WAS CASE IN IRAQ AND IS THE CASE IN IRAN, WHICH BY THE WAY I BELIEVE HAS THE LARGEST POPULATION OF JEWS IN THE ARAB COUNTRIES.
SO YOU WANT TO BOAST ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF WOMEN? UNFORTUNATELY BECAUSE OF THE HEAVY CENSORSHIP OF YOUR AND OUR MEDIA WE DONT KNOW HOW YOU TREAT YOUR WOMEN.
WE DO KNOW IN ISRAEL ABUSE OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN IS HIDDEN AS ALL ITHER FACTS THAT YOU MIGHT FIND UNPALATABLE.
BUT WE DO KNOW THAT YOU KILL WOMEN AND CHILDREN SPECIFICALLY . THAT THE IDF RAN DOWN AN UNARMED AMERICAN WOMAN WITHA SMIRK. THAT TOM HURNDAL WAS KILLED BY ONE OF YOUR SNIPERS TRYING TO PROTECT CHILDREN FROM YOUR CHILDREN KILLING SQUADS.
YOU HAVE L;EGAL TORTURE CHAMBERS WHICH HAVE BEEN IN NO CO COUNTRY SINCE ANCIENT ROME AND CALIGULA.
WE KNOW THAT YOU HAVE LIED CONSISTENTLY ABOUT EVERYTHING ABOUT ISRAEL.
SO YOUR WOMEN ARE FREE? AS LONG AS THEY BEHAVE AS LOWLIFE SLUTS AND NEVER CONTEST THE WRONGS YOU ARE DOING.
SO WHAT DOES IT MATTER WHAT YOU CLAIM. ONLY IDIOTS AND POLITICVALLY AND MONEYCORRUPTED BELIEVE WHAT YOU REPORT AS NEWS AND FACTS.
AND THIS IS OF COURSE IN DIRECT OBEDIENCE TO YOUR NEW RELIGION WHICH AS CHRIST OBSERVED NO LONGER FOLLOWS GODS LAW, BUT IS SIMILAR TO MAO'S LITTLE RED BOOK ALLOWING ANY DISHONESTY AND PERVERSION BY YOU AND ANY OTHER JEW INCLUDING WHO YOU ALLOW EQUALITY AND FREEDOM.
YOU HAVE ANY JEWISH PERSON WHO OBJECTS TO YOUR POLICIES IN JAIL OR INCOMMUNICADO , MALE OR FEMALE.
POOR OLD MARLON, IT COST HIM A LOT BECAUSE HE WAS AN HONEST MAN. GIBBO PIKED.
OF COURSE MICHAEL DID NOT KNOW THE JEWS HAD IT IN FOR HIM. BUT GIVE A JEW A CHANCE AT ANY NON JEW AND THEY WILL THROW SHIT ON HIM.
FOR NO REASON, THIS DISCUSSION WASABOUT THE FACT THAT THE MEDIA HAS MADE SURE EVERY NATIONAL AND RELIGIOUS GROUPS SINS AND EXCESSES HAVE BEEN BLOWN UP AND A MOVIE MADE.
BUT AS MARLON SAYS, NOT A SPOT ABOUT JEWS WHO APPARENTLY ARE COMPLETELY BLAMELESS IN ALL THINGS AND THROUGH ALL TIME.
IN FACT THE BLOOD LIBEL SHOWS HOW THEY ARE QUITE WILLING TO FIND A NAME AND GIVE THEIR CRIMINALS AND PAEDOS AN OUT AND HIDE THEM AS PART OF THIER GROUP.
IMAGINE IF CHRISTIANS TRIED TO HIDE PREDATORS OFF CHRISTIANS OF JEWS IN THE SAME WAY.
AND NOW TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT THEY CLAIM IS BLOOD LIBEL - SOUNDS MORE LIKE A CRIMINAL RING WHO SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED BACK.
>>> Fanatical Muzzies are like Hitler they want to kill Jews. >>> God Bless Israel and the final victory as predicted in Revelations.
>> You utter twat, "Adrian". > WELL IF YOU ARE JEWISH YOU ARE A CLEVER LITTLE FELLA, IF NOT? IT'S CALLED > CUTTING YOUR OWN THROAT.
> http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/snuffporn.htm > Three Russian Jews and eight Italian Jews were arrested after police > discovered they had been kidnapping non-Jewish children between the ages > of > two and five years from Russian orphanages, raping the children, and then > murdering them on film. Mostly non-Jewish customers, including 1,700 > nationwide, 600 in Italy, and an unknown number in the United States, paid > as much as $20,000 per film to watch little children being raped and > murdered.
> THEY MURDER NON JEWISH CITIZENS WITH IMPUNITY? ACTUALLY RUBBING ENGLISH > FAMILIES NOSES IN THE INJUSTICE.
> Hurndall, age 21, from Machester, England, had been standing between > Israeli > troops and Palestinian children when Israeli soldiers opened fire, > according > to a fellow activist from the International Solidarity Movement who > witnessed the scene.(AP Photo/Khalil Hamra)
> Immigration: The Full Story of the Immigrants Who Opened the > Floodgates
> The Culture of Critique reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
> In The Culture of Critique, Evolutionary Psychologist Professor Kevin > MacDonald advances a carefully researched but extremely controversial > thesis: that certain 20th century intellectual movements - largely > established and led by Jews - have changed European societies in > fundamental ways and destroyed the confidence of Western man. He > claims that these movements were designed, consciously or > unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests even though they were > presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even utopian. He concludes > that the increasing dominance of these ideas has had profound > political and social consequences that benefited Jews but caused great > harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes with > considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people generally > thought to be more sinned against than sinning.
> The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald's > massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two > previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation > and its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series > is written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a > unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic > groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of > California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first > volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of > uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from > other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile > relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the > almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile > societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of > Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account > of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.
> The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume > are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of > sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a > racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi- > culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis Prof. > MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements > as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to > give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their > own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against Jews is > not ethnocentrism but dishonesty - that while claiming to be working > for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and > to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the > brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of > gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group > solidarity they decry as immoral in others.
> Celebrating Diversity
> Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which > Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and > diversity - but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they > have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations > of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis > for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same > time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of > Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in > gentile society.
> Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group > loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a > society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The > Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their > survival as a people for thousands for years - even without a country > - has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in > nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald's > view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the > identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can > flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
> Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman: > "American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their > belief - one firmly rooted in history - that Jews are safe only in a > society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well > as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for > example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming > majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a > liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
> He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our- > strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a > society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a > Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept. Likewise, as > the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support > deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country > but because it is good for the Jews.
> Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish > economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic > policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate > anyway. His reason? "I'd rather live in a country governed by the > faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the > Republican convention." This man apparently distrusts white gentiles > and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies > were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good > for the country.
> Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University > makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing > his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next > century whites will become a minority, he writes, "We have tipped > beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in > this country." He is apparently prepared to displace the people and > culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise > of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as > potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and > national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews. > This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews > as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and > influence.
> In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, "We [Jews] > have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for > about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the > heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it > irreversible..." - just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement > of European culture also irreversible.
> Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to > several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish > immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942)
>>>>> Fanatical Muzzies are like Hitler they want to kill Jews. >>>>> God Bless Israel and the final victory as predicted in Revelations. >>>> You utter twat, "Adrian". >>> WELL IF YOU ARE JEWISH YOU ARE A CLEVER LITTLE FELLA, IF NOT? IT'S CALLED >>> CUTTING YOUR OWN THROAT.
>> Q. In which Middle-eastern country are Arab women treated as equals, >> allowed to vote and an education?
> I BELIEVE THAT IS THE WAS CASE IN IRAQ AND IS THE CASE IN IRAN, WHICH BY > THE WAY I BELIEVE HAS THE LARGEST POPULATION OF JEWS IN THE ARAB COUNTRIES.
>>>> Fanatical Muzzies are like Hitler they want to kill Jews. >>>> God Bless Israel and the final victory as predicted in Revelations. >>> You utter twat, "Adrian". >> WELL IF YOU ARE JEWISH YOU ARE A CLEVER LITTLE FELLA, IF NOT? IT'S CALLED >> CUTTING YOUR OWN THROAT.
16 year-old Iranian girl publically executed by Islamic Police for "crimes against chastity"
>>>>> Fanatical Muzzies are like Hitler they want to kill Jews. >>>>> God Bless Israel and the final victory as predicted in Revelations. >>>> You utter twat, "Adrian". >>> WELL IF YOU ARE JEWISH YOU ARE A CLEVER LITTLE FELLA, IF NOT? IT'S >>> CALLED CUTTING YOUR OWN THROAT.
> 16 year-old Iranian girl publically executed by Islamic Police for > "crimes against chastity"
yES THE GIRL WAS KILLED, BUT IT WAS ACCORDING TO THEIR LAW, NOT RANDOM KILLING OF INNOCENT WOMEN AND CHILDREN BY UNDISCIPLINED THUGS THAT YOU CALL AN ARMY.
AND TI TREN WE HAVE NO REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THEY CAN STOP OUR MEDIA. AND NEWS ABOUT YOU COMES FROM A COUNTRY RHAT HAS LEGAL TORTURE CHAMBERS WHICH SAYA A LOT ABOUT THE BARBARITY OF THE LAW MAKERS THAT THEY WOULD EVEN CONSIDER LEGAL TORTURE THAT HAS NOT BEEN AROUND IN A MODERN COUNTRY SINCE NERA AND CALIGULA.
As far as I am concerned we are supporting an inhuman and unexessary bunch of extremist idiots who can only boast of having the same values as us by closing ranks and not allowing any information to get out of israel, closing of complete areas and hust simply lying as that is part of what they consider normal for them. Ignoring or lying to non jews because this is the norm according to their new religion talmud.
Keep in mind that the 'A Clean Break' (war for Israel) agenda was written for Netanyahu (access the 'A Clean Break' link at the upper right of http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.COM).
is "war deluxe." Compared with previous wars, it is child's play - pilots bombing unimpeded as if on practice runs, tank and artillery soldiers shelling houses and civilians from their armored vehicles, combat engineering troops destroying entire streets in their ominous protected vehicles without facing serious opposition.
http://www.truthout.org/010809R "This is a shocking incident," said Pierre Wettach, the Red Cross's head of delegation for Israel and the Palestinian territories. "The Israeli military must have been aware of the situation but did not assist the wounded. Neither did they make it possible for us or the Palestine Red Crescent to assist the wounded."
What about this obama , going to wait for them to starve to death? These are no christian soldiers handing out chocolate bars.
This is a shocking incident," said Pierre Wettach, the Red Cross's head of delegation for Israel and the Palestinian territories. "The Israeli military must have been aware of the situation but did not assist the wounded. Neither did they make it possible for us or the Palestine Red Crescent to assist the wounded." What about this obama , going to wait for them to starve to death? These are no christian soldiers handing out chocolate bars.
Proof Israel lies Jan 24, 2009 8:28 AM Report Abuse In a thread I was taken to task because I claimed Israel routinely lies. Now a few days later a major British newspaper proves my case:
Once again Israel has been shown to lie over its tactics in battle. Here's the timeline exposed by the Times newspaper:
January 5 The Times reports that telltale smoke has appeared from areas of shelling. Israel denies using phosphorus
January 8 The Times reports photographic evidence showing stockpiles of white phosphorus (WP) shells. Israel Defence Forces spokesman says: "This is what we call a quiet shell - it has no explosives and no white phosphorus"
January 12 The Times reports that more than 50 phosphorus burns victims are taken into Nasser Hospital. An Israeli military spokesman "categorically" denies the use of white phosphorus
January 15 Remnants of white phosphorus shells are found in western Gaza. The IDF refuses to comment on specific weaponry but insists ammunition is "within the scope of international law"
January 16 The United Nations Relief and Works Agency headquarters are hit with phosphorus munitions. The Israeli military continues to deny its use
January 21 Avital Leibovich, Israel's military spokeswoman, admits white phosphorus munitions were employed in a manner "according to international law"
January 23 Israel says it is launching an investigation into white phosphorus munitions, which hit a UN school on January 17. "Some practices could be illegal but we are going into that. The IDF is holding an investigation concerning one specific unit and one incident" Source: Times database
Western governments and most of the Western media have accepted a number of Israeli claims justifying the military assault on Gaza: that Hamas consistently violated the six-month truce that Israel observed and then refused to extend it; that Israel therefore had no choice but to destroy Hamas's capacity to launch missiles into Israeli towns; that Hamas is a terrorist organisation, part of a global jihadi network; and that Israel has acted not only in its own defence but on behalf of an international struggle by Western democracies against this network.
I am not aware of a single major American newspaper, radio station or TV channel whose coverage of the assault on Gaza questions this version of events. Criticism of Israel's actions, if any (and there has been none from the Bush administration), has focused instead on whether the IDF's carnage is proportional to the threat it sought to counter, and whether it is taking adequate measures to prevent civilian casualties.
Middle East peacemaking has been smothered in deceptive euphemisms, so let me state bluntly that each of these claims is a lie. Israel, not Hamas, violated the truce: Hamas undertook to stop firing rockets into Israel; in return, Israel was to ease its throttlehold on Gaza. In fact, during the truce, it tightened it further. This was confirmed not only by every neutral international observer and NGO on the scene but by Brigadier General (Res.) Shmuel Zakai, a former commander of the IDF's Gaza Division. In an interview in Ha'aretz on 22 December, he accused Israel's government of having made a 'central error' during the tahdiyeh, the six-month period of relative truce, by failing 'to take advantage of the calm to improve, rather than markedly worsen, the economic plight of the Palestinians of the Strip . . . When you create a tahdiyeh, and the economic pressure on the Strip continues,' General Zakai said, 'it is obvious
...
"The persecution of Bahá'ís is the religious persecution of Bahá'is in various countries, especially in Iran, where the Bahá'í Faith originated and the location of one of the largest Bahá'í populations in the world.
The origins of persecution stem from a variety of Bahá'í teachings that challenge traditional Islamic belief, including the finality of Muhammad's prophethood, and places Bahá'ís outside the Islamic faith; thus Bahá'ís are seen as apostates from Islam and MUST CHOOSE BETWEEN REPENTANCE AND DEATH". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Bah%C3%A1%27%C3%ADs
CAPS added to assist idiots.
"Bahá’u’lláh took a more conciliatory position, forbidding the use of holy war to spread his faith. Instead, he attempted to engage various governments in dialog; however, the radical nature of his claim to prophethood did little to change the perception of the people of Iran.
To this day, Bahá'ís are a widely persecuted minority group in Iran and other predominantly Muslim countries, since they are seen as apostates from Islam"