Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
This Emissions Tax Swindle Will Cost BIG TIME!
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
bo n o  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9, 4:37 pm
Newsgroups: aus.invest, sci.environment, aus.politics, sci.skeptic, sci.geo.meteorology, alt.energy.renewable, alt.politics.bush, alt.conspiracy
From: "bo n o" <s...@t.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:37:17 +1100
Local: Mon, Nov 9 2009 4:37 pm
Subject: This Emissions Tax Swindle Will Cost BIG TIME!

$10 billion more of your cash

November 9 2009

Wow.!

KRudd's dream of slashing Australia's emissions - which are too tiny to
affect the world's temperature, anyway - sure doesn't come cheap:

"VICTORIA and NSW could get two gas-fired power stations, with TRUenergy
planning to spend more than $2 billion to slash emissions and provide
cleaner power to about 1.2 million homes. "

"But the company says this will depend on it receiving enough compensation
under the Federal Government's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, due to be
put to a Senate vote as early as next week. TRUenergy argues that unless it
remains profitable, it will be unable to move away from brown coal
electricity generation to cleaner technologies.... "

"Climate Change Minister Penny Wrong said the Government's CPRS would
provide more than $3 billion worth of assistance to coal-fired electricity
generators to help them transition to a carbon price.... But Mr McIndoe said
$3 billion ''wouldn't even come close to providing reasonable assistance''
and that $8 billion to $10 billion was the ''bare minimum'' needed."

So we'll pay $10 billion to get power that will actually cost us more, and
drive some industries overseas.

And this is just a small part of KRudd's plan - which won't actually lower
temperatures anyway.

Get the idea you're living in a madhouse, where the only sure thing is that
someone is spending your money?

Do you wake up each day now and wonder: "What wild scheme will KRudd spend
fresh millions on today?"

UPDATE

The costs keep mounting. Now a St Vincent de Paul study calculates the cost
of Rudd's colossal tax on emissions on the power bills of the poor:

"The study warns that the Federal Government's Carbon Pollution Reduction
Scheme will add an additional $240 ...."

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/com...

Warmest Regards

Bon z0

"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
from natural variation."

Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google