Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
aus.politics
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Australia didn't develop biological weapons
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   7 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Charles L  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 9:38 pm
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: "Charles L" <tj...@dodo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:38:53 +1100
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 9:38 pm
Subject: Australia didn't develop biological weapons
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
And thank goodness there were never any plans to.

Charles L


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
terryc  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 10:14 pm
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:14:09 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 10:14 pm
Subject: Re: Australia didn't develop biological weapons
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:38:53 +1100, Charles L wrote:
> And thank goodness there were never any plans to.

Check again. Hint, they carried out testing on Cape York.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Charles L  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 11:05 pm
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: "Charles L" <tj...@dodo.com.au>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:05:39 +1100
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 11:05 pm
Subject: Re: Australia didn't develop biological weapons
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

"terryc" <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote in message

news:hcp3a0$657$2@news.eternal-september.org...

> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:38:53 +1100, Charles L wrote:

>> And thank goodness there were never any plans to.

> Check again. Hint, they carried out testing on Cape York.

Who developed them then and what was the purpose?

Charles L


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
terryc  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4, 11:56 pm
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:56:55 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 11:56 pm
Subject: Re: Australia didn't develop biological weapons
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:05:39 +1100, Charles L wrote:
> "terryc" <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote in message
> news:hcp3a0$657$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:38:53 +1100, Charles L wrote:

>>> And thank goodness there were never any plans to.

>> Check again. Hint, they carried out testing on Cape York.

> Who developed them then and what was the purpose?

Find out for yourself. You will not take my word.
This will get you started;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Charles L  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5, 10:01 pm
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: "Charles L" <tj...@dodo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:01:04 +1100
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 10:01 pm
Subject: Re: Australia didn't develop biological weapons
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

"terryc" <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote in message

news:hcrtmn$d14$1@news.eternal-september.org...

> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:05:39 +1100, Charles L wrote:

>> "terryc" <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:hcp3a0$657$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:38:53 +1100, Charles L wrote:

>>>> And thank goodness there were never any plans to.

>>> Check again. Hint, they carried out testing on Cape York.

>> Who developed them then and what was the purpose?

> Find out for yourself. You will not take my word.
> This will get you started;
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

Yes thankyou. Well I do indeed stand corrected then.

Macfarlane Burnet sounds like he played a big role and I'd like to
know
more about him.

Charles L


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
terryc  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 1:27 am
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:27:14 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 1:27 am
Subject: Re: Australia didn't develop biological weapons
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:01:04 +1100, Charles L wrote:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

> Yes thankyou. Well I do indeed stand corrected then.

I only found out about it because the guinea pigs were denied proper
compensation from DVA. It "officially" didn't occur, so they couldn't
recognise their health damage as being war related.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Charles L  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 1:44 am
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: "Charles L" <tj...@dodo.com.au>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 01:44:47 +1100
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 1:44 am
Subject: Re: Australia didn't develop biological weapons
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

"terryc" <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote in message

news:hcunc1$l6q$2@news.eternal-september.org...

> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:01:04 +1100, Charles L wrote:

>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

>> Yes thankyou. Well I do indeed stand corrected then.

> I only found out about it because the guinea pigs were denied proper
> compensation from DVA. It "officially" didn't occur, so they
> couldn't
> recognise their health damage as being war related.

So what was the extent of Macfarlane Burnet's role in the development
of biological weapons?

Charles L


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google