Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
aus.politics
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Teachers sidestep new IR laws
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John X Smith  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2005, 11:04 pm
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: "John X Smith" <adim....@optusnet.com.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:04:15 +1100
Local: Wed, Dec 7 2005 11:04 pm
Subject: Teachers sidestep new IR laws
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Teachers sidestep new IR laws
8:20 PM December 7

Tasmania's public school teachers have become the first in Australia to
sidestep the Federal Government's industrial relations (IR) changes.

The Industrial Relations Commission (IRC) today deregistered the teacher's
federal award and two other workplace agreements.

The Tasmanian Industrial Commission has now formally registered the teachers
under a state award, which contains identical conditions to the one they
have left.

AEU Tasmanian president Jean Walker says the move will benefit more than
5,500 public sector teachers.

"I think that the worst of the proposed IR legislation proposals we'll be
protected from," she said.

"Those sorts of unfair dismissal and Australian Workplace Agreements.

"The sort of stripping away of rights and conditions - we'll be protected
from those under the state commision


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
BernardZ  
View profile  
 More options Dec 8 2005, 12:15 am
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: BernardZ <DontBot...@NOSPAM.COM>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:15:56 +1100
Local: Thurs, Dec 8 2005 12:15 am
Subject: Re: Teachers sidestep new IR laws
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
In article <4396cfc0$0$18197$afc38...@news.optusnet.com.au>,
adim....@optusnet.com.au says...

> Teachers sidestep new IR laws
> 8:20 PM December 7

> Tasmania's public school teachers have become the first in Australia to
> sidestep the Federal Government's industrial relations (IR) changes.

> The Industrial Relations Commission (IRC) today deregistered the teacher's
> federal award and two other workplace agreements.

> The Tasmanian Industrial Commission has now formally registered the teachers
> under a state award, which contains identical conditions to the one they
> have left.

I wonder if that would work. Under law, a federal law has precedence
over a state.

> AEU Tasmanian president Jean Walker says the move will benefit more than
> 5,500 public sector teachers.

> "I think that the worst of the proposed IR legislation proposals we'll be
> protected from," she said.

> "Those sorts of unfair dismissal and Australian Workplace Agreements.

> "The sort of stripping away of rights and conditions - we'll be protected
> from those under the state commision

--
It takes a lot of study to figure out how Euclid's geometry is based on
*self-evident* truths.

Observations of Bernard - No 90


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
TheMan  
View profile  
 More options Dec 8 2005, 12:56 am
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: "TheMan" <n...@none.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:56:10 +1000
Local: Thurs, Dec 8 2005 12:56 am
Subject: Re: Teachers sidestep new IR laws
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

"BernardZ" <DontBot...@NOSPAM.COM> wrote in message

news:MPG.1e018b971275b8059896de@east.Usenet-News.net...

Not if it's constitutionally against a States right. That would require a
referrendum.

-TheMan-


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bernardz  
View profile  
 More options Dec 8 2005, 1:16 pm
Newsgroups: aus.politics
From: "bernardz" <berna...@mail.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2005 18:16:49 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 8 2005 1:16 pm
Subject: Re: Teachers sidestep new IR laws
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

The way it is now is that a federal law overwrites a state law in
industrial relations, to change this, might need a referrendum.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google