> BTW - I find it a tad irritating that I have seen many of the blokes in here > call each other 'cunts' and no-one seems to bat an eyelid, but oooooh, a > girl cussing, and all of a sudden blokes act all offended and shocked....... > FFS!
Cuss and swear all you like as far as I'm concerned :) [1]
G-S
[1] That picture of Johno and his girfriend makes me curse every time.
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:48:23 +1100, G-S <ge...@castbus.com.au> wrote: >bikerbetty wrote:
>> BTW - I find it a tad irritating that I have seen many of the blokes in here >> call each other 'cunts' and no-one seems to bat an eyelid, but oooooh, a >> girl cussing, and all of a sudden blokes act all offended and shocked....... >> FFS!
>Cuss and swear all you like as far as I'm concerned :) [1]
>G-S
>[1] That picture of Johno and his girfriend makes me curse every time.
<tconn...@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> wrote: >sometimes, when I'm really angry and on edge, there's nothing to >replace a good 'FUCK' -- bikerbetty
I think you could improve it gramatically for betty by replacing "to replace" with "like", and you could drop the quotation marks too. =================
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:54:32 +1100, TimC > <tconn...@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> wrote:
>>sometimes, when I'm really angry and on edge, there's nothing to >>replace a good 'FUCK' -- bikerbetty
> I think you could improve it gramatically for betty by replacing "to > replace" with "like", and you could drop the quotation marks too. > =================
> Onya bike
> Gerry
Remember Gerry, you are not trying to beat Betty besides, you can beat an egg but you cant beet-a-root
JohnO wrote: > On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:48:23 +1100, G-S <ge...@castbus.com.au> wrote:
>> bikerbetty wrote: >>> BTW - I find it a tad irritating that I have seen many of the blokes in here >>> call each other 'cunts' and no-one seems to bat an eyelid, but oooooh, a >>> girl cussing, and all of a sudden blokes act all offended and shocked....... >>> FFS!
>> Cuss and swear all you like as far as I'm concerned :) [1]
>> G-S
>> [1] That picture of Johno and his girfriend makes me curse every time.
The new rules There are three new rules for motorcyclists.
No passengers under eight years old. A young child under eight years of age cant be carried as a passenger on a motorcycle, unless in a sidecar. Travelling in a sidecar. When a sidecar is used, it can only carry the number of passengers for which it is designed. No animals between rider and handlebars. Animals cant be carried between the rider and the handlebars of a motorcycle. Exemptions There is an exemption for farmers. While working, a farmer can carry an animal between the rider and the handlebars of a motorcycle for up to 500 metres on a road.
What you have to do If you are carrying young passengers, other than in a sidecar make sure that they are at least eight years old, they can reach the foot pegs and they are wearing an approved motorcycle helmet.
Also limit your sidecar passengers and use other ways to transport animals.
---------------
Does one have to own a farm to be called a farmer?
>>>sometimes, when I'm really angry and on edge, there's nothing to >>>replace a good 'FUCK' -- bikerbetty
>> I think you could improve it gramatically for betty by replacing "to >> replace" with "like", and you could drop the quotation marks too. >Remember Gerry, you are not trying to beat Betty
What?! Not even with an ostrich feather? How about if I just brush it ever so gently over her private parts?
Do you think this conversation is getting a bit out of hand?
>The new rules >There are three new rules for motorcyclists.
>No passengers under eight years old. A young child under eight years of >age cant be carried as a passenger on a motorcycle, unless in a >sidecar. >Travelling in a sidecar. When a sidecar is used, it can only carry the >number of passengers for which it is designed. >No animals between rider and handlebars. Animals cant be carried >between the rider and the handlebars of a motorcycle.
Easy peasy. The only time I've ridden with a dog on my bike was on the Yarra Boulevarde in the 80s. The dog was between me and my pillion. Nowhere near the handlebars. Dog was having a ball. I must admit to us both being drunk and am surprised we survived that trip as the VF was getting sparks off the road where we were bottoming the thing out constantly as I decided we'd go home via the boulevarde than creeping quietly home via the direct route.
>>The new rules >>There are three new rules for motorcyclists.
>>No passengers under eight years old. A young child under eight years of >>age can't be carried as a passenger on a motorcycle, unless in a >>sidecar. >>Travelling in a sidecar. When a sidecar is used, it can only carry the >>number of passengers for which it is designed. >>No animals between rider and handlebars. Animals can't be carried >>between the rider and the handlebars of a motorcycle.
> Easy peasy. The only time I've ridden with a dog on my bike was on the > Yarra Boulevarde in the 80s. The dog was between me and my pillion. > Nowhere near the handlebars. Dog was having a ball. I must admit to us > both being drunk and am surprised we survived that trip as the VF was > getting sparks off the road where we were bottoming the thing out > constantly as I decided we'd go home via the boulevarde than creeping > quietly home via the direct route
Used to be a bloke in Melbourne who would have his dog on the back of his bike W.D. or Wonder Dog used to lean on the corners better than a human pillion
> The new rules > There are three new rules for motorcyclists.
> No passengers under eight years old. A young child under eight years of > age can't be carried as a passenger on a motorcycle, unless in a > sidecar. > Travelling in a sidecar. When a sidecar is used, it can only carry the > number of passengers for which it is designed. > No animals between rider and handlebars. Animals can't be carried > between the rider and the handlebars of a motorcycle. > Exemptions > There is an exemption for farmers. While working, a farmer can carry an > animal between the rider and the handlebars of a motorcycle for up to > 500 metres on a road.
> What you have to do > If you are carrying young passengers, other than in a sidecar make sure > that they are at least eight years old, they can reach the foot pegs and > they are wearing an approved motorcycle helmet.
> Also limit your sidecar passengers and use other ways to transport > animals.
> ---------------
> Does one have to own a farm to be called a farmer?
> :-P
I once knew of a bloke they called The Farmer, but the only relativity he had with a farm was that his parents owned a farm and he grew dope in his backyard in Brunswick.
>>>"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message >>>news:gb2af5l8okfne5ke4buunu6ckcsif4a5a2@4ax.com... >>>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:54:32 +1100, TimC >>>> <tconn...@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> wrote:
>>>>>sometimes, when I'm really angry and on edge, there's nothing to >>>>>replace a good 'FUCK' -- bikerbetty
>>>> I think you could improve it gramatically for betty by replacing "to >>>> replace" with "like", and you could drop the quotation marks too.
>>>Remember Gerry, you are not trying to beat Betty
>> What?! Not even with an ostrich feather? How about if I just brush it >> ever so gently over her private parts?
>> Do you think this conversation is getting a bit out of hand? >A hand is sometimes better than an ostrich feather
I think we shoud leave it here. Before Betty karate chops us into little pieces. "Hiyaaaaaaaaaahhh !!!
>>>>"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message >>>>news:gb2af5l8okfne5ke4buunu6ckcsif4a5a2@4ax.com... >>>>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:54:32 +1100, TimC >>>>> <tconn...@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> wrote:
>>>>>>sometimes, when I'm really angry and on edge, there's nothing to >>>>>>replace a good 'FUCK' -- bikerbetty
>>>>> I think you could improve it gramatically for betty by replacing "to >>>>> replace" with "like", and you could drop the quotation marks too.
>>>>Remember Gerry, you are not trying to beat Betty
>>> What?! Not even with an ostrich feather? How about if I just brush it >>> ever so gently over her private parts?
>>> Do you think this conversation is getting a bit out of hand?
>>A hand is sometimes better than an ostrich feather
> I think we shoud leave it here. Before Betty karate chops us into > little pieces. "Hiyaaaaaaaaaahhh !!!
>>>>>>On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:54:32 +1100, TimC >>>>>><tconn...@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>sometimes, when I'm really angry and on edge, there's nothing to >>>>>>>replace a good 'FUCK' -- bikerbetty
>>>>>>I think you could improve it gramatically for betty by replacing "to >>>>>>replace" with "like", and you could drop the quotation marks too.
>>>>>Remember Gerry, you are not trying to beat Betty
>>>>What?! Not even with an ostrich feather? How about if I just brush it >>>>ever so gently over her private parts?
>>>>Do you think this conversation is getting a bit out of hand?
>>>A hand is sometimes better than an ostrich feather
>>I think we shoud leave it here. Before Betty karate chops us into >>little pieces. "Hiyaaaaaaaaaahhh !!!
>>=================
>>Onya bike
>>Gerry
> With her hand or her ostrich feathers?
In my experience ostrich / emu / peacock feathers ar not suited to violent movement...unless still attached to the bird
They look good but you can't thrash 'em around or they break...they don't get much thrashing around on the bird either...an Emu / Ostrich is a bit like a mobile hay bale...the Peacock does at least fly a bit but the feathers that get all the thrashing are small and like a chook feather
Chook feathers are eminently suitable for administering 'delicate touches' with, and quite robust...the exotic feathers can be too fluffy and tickly
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:31:53 +1000, Fulliautomatix <t...@goo.net> wrote:
>In my experience ostrich / emu / peacock feathers ar not suited to >violent movement...unless still attached to the bird >They look good but you can't thrash 'em around or they break...they >don't get much thrashing around on the bird either...an Emu / Ostrich is >a bit like a mobile hay bale...the Peacock does at least fly a bit but >the feathers that get all the thrashing are small and like a chook feather >Chook feathers are eminently suitable for administering 'delicate >touches' with, and quite robust...the exotic feathers can be too fluffy >and tickly
On Nov 8, 6:38 pm, Toosmoky <toosm...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Fulliautomatix wrote: > > In my experience ostrich / emu / peacock feathers ar not suited to > > violent movement...unless still attached to the bird > Theo may disagree...
Damn right. And if you've got one of those bikes which have the cylinders sticking out the side, you still find small feathers in the fins two years later.
If you're looking for feathers that can hurt you, try getting near a wing-flapping goose.
|
