Message from discussion Apology for my chidish behaviour

From: "Tony Smith" <t...@Yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: aus.cars.offroad
Subject: Re: Apology for my chidish behaviour
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:17:29 +1000
Organization: Customer of Connect.com.au Pty. Ltd.
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <newscache$wbaklh$ys2$1@news.tonsyl.org>
References: <3f6bbac4$1@news.comindico.com.au> <3f6c0fb5$0$14956$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <newscache$333jlh$gy1$1@news.tonsyl.org> <3f6ceabb@news.comindico.com.au>
Reply-To: "Tony Smith" <tony.sm...@usa.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.55.215.232
X-Trace: gnamma.connect.com.au 1064107451 28165 203.55.215.232 (21 Sep 2003 01:24:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@connect.com.au
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Sep 2003 01:24:11 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pc-00150.tonsyl.org
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!news.xtra.co.nz!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.ade.connect.com.au!duster.adelaide.on.net!news.syd.connect.com.au!news.bri.connect.com.au!not-for-mail


"TD4GRUNT" <scottr...@NOSPAMdodo.com.au> wrote in message
news:3f6ceabb@news.comindico.com.au...
>
>
>
>
> I'm not going to start this immature argument up again, I said it was
> finished, not for the fact I can't prove myself, just for the fact it's
> getting way too childish and everyone here doesn't want to hear it
anymore,
> so leave it there Tony. If you still want to carry on, I'll just sit back
> and watch you do more damage to yourself while you do it.

No, you are giving up because you are a liar, and a calculating one at that.
More to the point, now that you are comprehensively exposed for what you
are, it's al just a little hard isn't it?

In the alternative, you are so whacked out on drugs you don't know when you
are fiddling with the truth.


If I am wrong. Please show the website or verifiable data that proves it.

If you can't, then admit that you lied again and again, and that you lied in
the face of clear evidence that you had seen with your own eyes.

You don't get off this hook shit-for-brains.


>  I hate to disappoint you, but I've always known that you have studied
law,

More lies, as always,you had no fucking idea until it was shoved in your
face. Just like you didn't know about the Rover 75, you didn't know the
difference between "classic" injection and CR diesels, you didn't know the
differences between the 320D variant and the Rover/Freeloader versions. It
just didn't stop you lying about it for one moment did it.


By the way, does this mean that you are not sending a writ now?
Why?
Because you are scared?
Or because it was always one of your lies anyway?

Bear in mind, that threatening legal action is itself actionable.
Fortunately for you, I am not vindictive.



>
> That's the way,just keep it going, your ONE and only fan is watching you,
> the rest are thinking you are pathetic.
>

Poor liddle diddums...Caught lying again and just wants everyone to pretend
it didn't happen. Poor little snookums...

And actually whilst I think that some people are probably thinking that this
is getting a bit "old", no one ever objects to a calculating, back-stabbing
liar getting their just deserts.

You are the pathetic, calculating liar. Not me.......



Tony Smith