Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

View parsed - Show only message text

Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!snewsf0.syd.ops.aspac.uu.net!pit-transit.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "beerwolf" <beerw...@REMfastOVEmail.com.au>
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
References: <477e25d1$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <477f0f0f$0$5448$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com> <qjWfj.24$421.5@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
Lines: 45
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Message-ID: <jH0gj.106$421.64@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:54:39 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.181.141.108
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1199609679 124.181.141.108 (Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:54:39 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:54:39 EST
Organization: BigPond Internet Services
X-Original-Bytes: 3098

Liz wrote:

... snip

>> What about folding bikes that pack into the size of a suit case are these 
>> banned as well ?
>>
>> If not riders that are affected by this might want to think about the 
>> folding options.
>>
>
> I don't know about Victoria, but in Sydney there's no special rule and 
> it's pretty much at the discretion of whatever rail staff you happen to 
> come across. My husband and I both independantly asked the helpline and 
> both times the person who answered had to ask their supervisor and came 
> back with the answer that if you can pick it up and carry it, it counts as 
> luggage (we didn't point out that you can actually pick up and carry an 
> unfolded bike). However, one particular ticket seller insisted on my 
> buying an extra ticket for the bike, despite being told this, pretty much 
> on the grounds of "a bike's a bike".

I rarely use public transport these days; however if I ever find myself
in the position of wanting to take my folding bike on a train in Sydney
peak hour, I fully intend to *not* purchase a ticket, and if the transit
police issue a fine, I fully intend to contest it through the courts. I 
think
there is an arguable case that a folding bike (in a bag) is not a bike.

Getting back to the original topic, I've spent the last  3 months living
and working in Melbourne, commuting 30km both ways each day
with one exception when I used the train. The trip home that day was
enough to convince me that almost anything would be preferable to
a peak hour train trip in Melbourne, with or without a bike.
That 'almost anything' arrived just before Christmas, when a severe
afternoon thunderstorm sent me to Parliament station with my bike
for the trip home. I would have happily paid a quadruple fare; luckily
the train had enough space for both of us, and the bike was free.

I can see both side of the issue too - I think any lobbying should
encompass a willingness to pay a surcharge of some kind for the bike.

-- 
beerwolf 



Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google