|
|
aus.bicycle |
>> "DJ" wrote: >>> carriage and someone gets on the train with a wet bike with some mud >> And say you had a need to take your bike on a train, and had chosen a > Except that the reason they are banned is because they are full. > Will you have an inspector who will check bikes for cleanliness before > OPen spaces are usually about lack of people. What's the population And yes, bikes may well be banned there, but these cities have much greater -- ~~~ ~ _@ "Zebee Johnstone" wrote: But often they are NOT. Eg. before 4.30pm and after 6.00pm. But the ban
> In aus.bicycle on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:51:23 GMT
> PeteSig <pete...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>> splashed up the side of it or just dirty water from the roads, rubbed up
>>> against your suit or workclothes,
>> carriage that was not packed full?? And the bike was clean?
still applies.
No. Leave it up to reasonable people to make a sensible decision. Like they
> they are allowed on? Will you agree that if there are more than X
> people on the train at any one time all cyclists are thrown off at the
> next station?
will with pram-users/people with lots of luggage.
>> One thing all our crap train carriages lack is overhead straps and rails, No, open spaces, where there were no seats. Standing room, with straps to
>> so
>> that stops and starts are not such a threat. Why blame the cyclist? We
>> had
>> plenty of straps and open spaces in the old carriages of the 70s and 80s.
> of the city and the numbers using trains now compared to them?
hold onto. FAR more people can be accomodated with standing room, and in
off-peak there's still more than enough seats, and space to carry bikes out
of the doorways. Talk to travellers overseas - most of the mass rail systems
in NY, Tokyo, London have carriages with standing spaces, some are almost
all standing room with only seats along the sides of the carriages.
population densities and PT use. Personally I think the idea of paying a
concession fare for a bike in peak periods was a good one. But this was
dropped by the Met, for some reason. Maybe too hard to police ??
Cheers
Peter
~~ ~ _- \,
~~ (*)/ (*)