Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "PeteSig" <pete...@bigpond.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:12:12 GMT
Local: Mon, Jan 7 2008 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
"Zebee Johnstone" wrote: But often they are NOT. Eg. before 4.30pm and after 6.00pm. But the ban > In aus.bicycle on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:51:23 GMT > PeteSig <pete...@bigpond.com> wrote: >> "DJ" wrote: >>> carriage and someone gets on the train with a wet bike with some mud >> And say you had a need to take your bike on a train, and had chosen a > Except that the reason they are banned is because they are full. still applies. > Will you have an inspector who will check bikes for cleanliness before will with pram-users/people with lots of luggage. >> One thing all our crap train carriages lack is overhead straps and rails, No, open spaces, where there were no seats. Standing room, with straps to >> so >> that stops and starts are not such a threat. Why blame the cyclist? We >> had >> plenty of straps and open spaces in the old carriages of the 70s and 80s. > OPen spaces are usually about lack of people. What's the population hold onto. FAR more people can be accomodated with standing room, and in off-peak there's still more than enough seats, and space to carry bikes out of the doorways. Talk to travellers overseas - most of the mass rail systems in NY, Tokyo, London have carriages with standing spaces, some are almost all standing room with only seats along the sides of the carriages. And yes, bikes may well be banned there, but these cities have much greater -- ~~~ ~ _@ You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||