Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
PeteSig  
View profile  
 More options Jan 7 2008, 5:12 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "PeteSig" <pete...@bigpond.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:12:12 GMT
Local: Mon, Jan 7 2008 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"Zebee Johnstone"  wrote:
> In aus.bicycle on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:51:23 GMT
> PeteSig <pete...@bigpond.com> wrote:

>> "DJ"  wrote:

>>> carriage and someone gets on the train with a wet bike with some mud
>>> splashed up the side of it or just dirty water from the roads, rubbed up
>>> against your suit or workclothes,

>> And say you had a need to take your bike on a train, and had chosen a
>> carriage that was not packed full?? And the bike was clean?

> Except that the reason they are banned is because they are full.

But often they are NOT. Eg. before 4.30pm and after 6.00pm. But the ban
still applies.

> Will you have an inspector who will check bikes for cleanliness before
> they are allowed on?  Will you agree that if there are more than X
> people on the train at any one time all cyclists are thrown off at the
> next station?

No. Leave it up to reasonable people to make a sensible decision. Like they
will with pram-users/people with lots of luggage.

>> One thing all our crap train carriages lack is overhead straps and rails,
>> so
>> that stops and starts are not such a threat. Why blame the cyclist? We
>> had
>> plenty of straps and open spaces in the old carriages of the 70s and 80s.

> OPen spaces are usually about lack of people.  What's the population
> of the city and the numbers using trains now compared to them?

No, open spaces, where there were no seats. Standing room, with straps to
hold onto. FAR more people can be accomodated with standing room, and in
off-peak there's still more than enough seats, and space to carry bikes out
of the doorways. Talk to travellers overseas - most of the mass rail systems
in NY, Tokyo, London have carriages with standing spaces, some are almost
all standing room with only seats along the sides of the carriages.

And yes, bikes may well be banned there, but these cities have much greater
population densities and PT use. Personally I think the idea of paying a
concession fare for a bike in peak periods was a good one. But this was
dropped by the Met, for some reason. Maybe too hard to police ??

--
Cheers
Peter

~~~ ~ _@
~~ ~ _- \,
~~ (*)/  (*)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google