Web Images Videos Maps News Groups Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 76 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Vintage  
View profile  
 More options Jan 4 2008, 11:25 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "Vintage" <dontemai...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:25:58 +1100
Local: Fri, Jan 4 2008 11:25 pm
Subject: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
Well great to see the cut and past job from Connex that didn't address any
of the concerns I raised with them over the bike ban on trains in peak hour.

Lets me just say that if its dark in the arvo,  the rain hits hard,  the
roads are REAL nasty I'm telling the wife to get the train still home with
her bike instead of riding home that night.  We will cop any fine they want
to throw at us or action taking as its still better than the worst case
scenario of her on the roads in those conditions.   And I trust her skills
on the road,  its just all the other nuts I don't trust and see daily.

I take it when the new trains are here we are allowed back on?

Here is the response about the bike scapegoat issue we are facing.

"Thank you for your feedback to Metlink regarding bikes on trains.

During the last two years, patronage has increased by 23% on Connex train
services. Patronage is expected to continue to increase and a number of
steps are being taken to increase the capacity of the train network to
enable more passengers to be carried.

The Victorian government has recently announced an order for 18 new
suburban trains and 22 new V/Locity carriages. However, growing patronage
has meant that a number of difficult operational decisions were required to
maximise the number of passengers that can be carried on peak hour
services. It is expected that the removal of bikes from the most congested
parts of the network during peak hours will enable more passengers to be
carried, providing significant environmental and community benefits.

The restrictions for bikes are highly targeted and only apply to bikes
travelling in the peak direction during peak times. For Connex trains, the
ban only applies to services within Zone 1. Customers will continue to be
able to travel at off-peak times and in the counter peak direction without
restrictions. Similar rules exist in other Australian suburban train
networks, including Brisbane and Perth.

The Victorian Government and the public transport industry strongly support
the use of public transport in conjunction with cycling and regret the need
to restrict bikes from peak hour trains. Public transport users are
encouraged to continue to use bikes in conjunction with public transport by
leaving their bikes at the station at peak times and taking their bikes on
trains during off-peak times. (who wants to leave a good bike at a station
all day,  day in day out at the same time each day in most areas?)

Lockers are provided at many Connex and V/Line stations.(Rubbish) Rental
fees for
lockers have been eliminated, with only a refundable deposit now required.
Fees for the carriage of bikes on public transport have been eliminated.
CCTV coverage at stations reduces the chances of theft. Six carriage trains
are now operated on the majority of off-peak services, providing more room
for bikes during the day, at night and on weekends.

The Victorian Government recognises that there is more work to do in
relation to bicycle storage at stations. The Department of Infrastructure
is working with Connex and Bicycle Victoria to implement a bike cage
storage facility at a suburban station as a trial. If successful(100 bikes
NOT stolen) , more bike
cages are likely to be implemented.

Thank you for raising this matter with the Public Transport Division.

Yours sincerely

Adrian Webb
Victorian Fare Policy Manager


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
DJ  
View profile  
 More options Jan 5 2008, 7:27 am
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "DJ" <mrj...@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 07:27:22 +1100
Local: Sat, Jan 5 2008 7:27 am
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"Vintage" <dontemai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:477e25d1$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

I know it's frustrating about not allowing you to take your bike on the
train but i gather that in most cases, judging by your post, you only use
the train when the weather turns shit but most times your wife and perhaps
yourself would be commuting on the bike instead of using the train.I guess
it's hard to please all concerned.
Jeez, when does peak time finish in Melb? You stated it's dark and wet so
that tells me at this time of the year it'd have to be around 7.30 to 8pm so
usually peak time in the cities finish at around 7pm so I can't see why you
can't take the bike on at this time of the evening.

Regarding bike parking stations, some stations have got them and some not,
but it might be worth considering at times when the weather is bad to just
have a crappy cheap bike to chain up at the station near home and if it does
get pinched or vandalised, it's not such a big deal and leave the good one
at home for the good days of commuting.

cheers
DJ


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ray  
View profile  
 More options Jan 5 2008, 7:40 am
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: ray <ferre...@optusnet.com.au>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:40:43 +1100
Local: Sat, Jan 5 2008 7:40 am
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

No, having established the precedent, it will stay. And it would help if
the service they provide was going to be significantly improved. But
it's not. I live in Ferntree Gully. If you caught the 0733 morning
express to the city in 1969, you'll be doing exactly the same in 2009,
as the timetables haven't changed at all, apart from adding ten minutes
for the City Loop.
Here's a nice figure you can quote:

Average speed Melb suburban train, steam, 1885:         30 k/mh
Average speed Melb suburban train, electric, 2008:      37 k/mh

Which speaks for itself. With some minor exceptions (Glen Waverley and
Westona) the entire heavy rail system dates from prior to the 1892
economic crash.
The trains themselves are quite capable of cruising at 115 k/mh.
However, Apart from Watergardens, Pakenham and parts of Werribee, the
trains are normally restricted to 80-100 k/mh due to the indifferent
state of the tracks, hence the average above. Which for Sydneysiders, is
a full 10 k/mh slower than the CityRail equivalent.
The entire system essentially needs rebuilding from the tracks up. But
as one former MP put it recently: `Opening new lines is sexy. Upgrading
existing ones is not'. So this comes down to the egos of politicians,
and on that one we've lost.
Cheers,
        Ray


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Vintage  
View profile  
 More options Jan 5 2008, 10:28 am
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "Vintage" <dontemai...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:28:31 +1100
Local: Sat, Jan 5 2008 10:28 am
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
Well I ride no matter the weather as being a courier toughens you up to the
elements.  But yeah even though she rides everyday its nice to have the
option to use on the occasions its not so nice out there etc.

And the new rules are different for every trainline.  Its not a starting
time for your journey,  its what time the train gets into Flinders st in the
city.  Any train that gets into town by 7am-9am is out of bounds.  Same too
any train that leaves town from 4pm-7pm.

Basically anyone wanting to work 9-5 and use a bike is excluded.

As for the darkness I was mainly referring to winter where here it can get
black and dark at 3pm in the arvo LOL

And locking bikes up here is like Snake on the Simpsons,  no matter what it
is if its chained up they'll try to take it.

I've got mates that get the train in after riding from South Morang to
Epping station for instance so they can ride all day in town for work.
These new rules mean a LONG day in the saddle with them HAVING to commute
from South Morang into town,  ride all day and THEN ride home most likely
into a northerly at this time of the year pretty buggered.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
PeteSig  
View profile  
 More options Jan 5 2008, 12:37 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "PeteSig" <pete...@bigpond.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:37:47 GMT
Local: Sat, Jan 5 2008 12:37 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"DJ"  wrote:
> I know it's frustrating about not allowing you to take your bike on the
> train but i gather that in most cases, judging by your post, you only use
> the train when the weather turns shit but most times your wife and perhaps
> yourself would be commuting on the bike instead of using the train.I guess
> it's hard to please all concerned.

So it's ok to shaft the occasional PT user?

> Jeez, when does peak time finish in Melb? You stated it's dark and wet so
> that tells me at this time of the year it'd have to be around 7.30 to 8pm
> so usually peak time in the cities finish at around 7pm so I can't see why
> you can't take the bike on at this time of the evening.

Winter in Melbourne is cold and wet at 5.30pm. As far as I know this ban
will continue, indefinitely.

--
Cheers
Peter

~~~ ~ _@
~~ ~ _- \,
~~ (*)/  (*)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
DJ  
View profile  
 More options Jan 5 2008, 1:25 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "DJ" <mrj...@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:25:23 +1100
Local: Sat, Jan 5 2008 1:25 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"PeteSig" <pete...@bigpond.com> wrote in message

news:LbBfj.31663$CN4.1062@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

> "DJ"  wrote:

>> I know it's frustrating about not allowing you to take your bike on the
>> train but i gather that in most cases, judging by your post, you only use
>> the train when the weather turns shit but most times your wife and
>> perhaps yourself would be commuting on the bike instead of using the
>> train.I guess it's hard to please all concerned.

> So it's ok to shaft the occasional PT user?

Well no it's not ok but understandable to make restrictions at certain peak
times due to possible risk to other commuters.
Say you weren't a bike rider, and your travelling in a fairly packed
carriage and someone gets on the train with a wet bike with some mud
splashed up the side of it or just dirty water from the roads, rubbed up
against your suit or workclothes, or worse still, you get scraped along the
leg with a sharp end of a pedal or chainwheel or it rips your suit leg to
peices, just because the bike was in the carriage, no fault to anyone but
all it takes is a jerk from a sudden stop to send standing passengers
scurrying to get balance.
It's like on a bus, at no time are bicycles allowed on a bus due to the
tight confines of that type of vehicle.
Prams are another pain in the arse,but unlike bicycles, don't have the sharp
peices to rip you open and that's the only reason they restrict bikes at
these times plus the fact that for every bike on the train, they can fit 2
more people.
It doesn't seem fair I know but I've seen it happen where an elderly gent
accidently stepped back due to the braking of the train and he was left with
a nice peice out of his right leg after it came into contact with a
chainwheel.

>> Jeez, when does peak time finish in Melb? You stated it's dark and wet so
>> that tells me at this time of the year it'd have to be around 7.30 to 8pm
>> so usually peak time in the cities finish at around 7pm so I can't see
>> why you can't take the bike on at this time of the evening.

> Winter in Melbourne is cold and wet at 5.30pm. As far as I know this ban
> will continue, indefinitely.

In Sydney, Cityrail allows bikes in peak but you must have an childfare
ticket for it to travel but outside peak it's free as well as all weekends.

Well in Vintage's original post, he didn't indicate that he was referring to
winter times so I just took it that he was referring to a very recent
occurance.In summer though, after 7pm and the peak time officially over,then
there'd still be enough daylight.  Cheers  DJ


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
DJ  
View profile  
 More options Jan 5 2008, 1:52 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "DJ" <mrj...@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:52:01 +1100
Local: Sat, Jan 5 2008 1:52 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"Vintage" <dontemai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:477e25d1$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

It would be relatively cheap to alter  some carriages compared to building
purpose made ones but it was just an idea that came into my head prompted by
this post. If you think it's a stupid idea...ok well and good i s;pose!!

One of the main problems in the modern cities and communites, the demand for
special rail priveldges plus the major problems with OH&S and insurance
liabilities, it's becomming increasingly difficult and expensive to cater
for all of the many kinds of individuals that need to get around.

Maybe one day (in dreamtime) we will get a pollie to take the guantlet and
run with it.
Clover Moore, the Sydney Lord Mayor is a keen cyclist and is trying her best
to make Sydney more cycle friendly but has certain oppositions from the
State heirachy. I hope she succeeds eventually but like anyone with new
fresh ideas, they eventually get railroaded.

Cheers

DJ


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Resound  
View profile  
 More options Jan 5 2008, 1:57 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "Resound" <sacredc...@bigpond.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:57:18 +1100
Local: Sat, Jan 5 2008 1:57 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"Vintage" <dontemai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:477ec11a$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

It's actually 4-6pm according to a sign I saw (I think it was at Parliament
station). I thought it was 7pm as well so I hung around in the city on
Thursday reading and sipping a beer an hour longer than I had to. Not tragic
in that case.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Boostland  
View profile  
 More options Jan 5 2008, 4:00 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "Boostland" <Boostl...@kooragangcycling.asn.au>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:00:43 +1100
Local: Sat, Jan 5 2008 4:00 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"Vintage" <dontemai...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:477e25d1$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

What about folding bikes that pack into the size of a suit case are these
banned as well ?

If not riders that are affected by this might want to think about the
folding options.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
AndrewJ  
View profile  
 More options Jan 5 2008, 9:33 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: AndrewJ <AJenningsFranks...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:33:17 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Jan 5 2008 9:33 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
On Jan 5, 4:00 pm, "Boostland" <Boostl...@kooragangcycling.asn.au>
wrote:

In a strange case of unexpected side effects, I've decided to stop
riding Connex as much and instead try and look for
a new path to ride back and from work. I'd given up riding to work as
I was sick of the company of all those wonderful
considerate car drivers.

Whenever I see something that annoys me from Connex, I ask myself: how
can I reduce what I pay to Connex? I figure
if everyone did the same thing then they would go out of business
fairly quickly.

Anyone got experience of riding the Bay bike path to and from
Mordialloc to the city? I tried to find information on ithe current
state, but nothing of substance on bv site. From the google images it
seems ok. Yes, I know it's slow, but I'm
not in a hurry.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
PeteSig  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 11:51 am
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "PeteSig" <pete...@bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:51:23 GMT
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 11:51 am
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"DJ"  wrote:

> Well no it's not ok but understandable to make restrictions at certain
> peak times due to possible risk to other commuters.

Restrictions start to look like persecution when there are only ever a tiny
number of people who would take a bike on a peak hour train.

> Say you weren't a bike rider, and your travelling in a fairly packed
> carriage and someone gets on the train with a wet bike with some mud
> splashed up the side of it or just dirty water from the roads, rubbed up
> against your suit or workclothes,

And say you had a need to take your bike on a train, and had chosen a
carriage that was not packed full?? And the bike was clean?

> or worse still, you get scraped along the leg with a sharp end of a pedal
> or chainwheel or it rips your suit leg to peices, just because the bike
> was in the carriage,

Some people just lack gross motor skills, I know.

> no fault to anyone but all it takes is a jerk from a sudden stop to send
> standing passengers scurrying to get balance.

One thing all our crap train carriages lack is overhead straps and rails, so
that stops and starts are not such a threat. Why blame the cyclist? We had
plenty of straps and open spaces in the old carriages of the 70s and 80s.

> It's like on a bus, at no time are bicycles allowed on a bus due to the
> tight confines of that type of vehicle.

Yes, but they can be carried on external rails vis. Brisbane and Canberra
buses

> Prams are another pain in the arse,but unlike bicycles, don't have the
> sharp peices to rip you open

!!!!

> and that's the only reason they restrict bikes at these times plus the
> fact that for every bike on the train, they can fit 2 more people.

No, the rail authorities seem to have an innate antipathy to bikes. V-line
is banning bikes on peak country services, despite the fact that NO
additional passenger space will be available as a result (all bikes go into
designated bike luggage areas)

Maybe things are differnet in NSW. You need to get a perspective on
Victoria, where one of the best PT systems in Australia for bike/rail
multimode travel, is being made much less usable... and all by a Labor
government who lay claims to wanting greater sustainability!!!

--
Cheers
Peter

~~~ ~ _@
~~ ~ _- \,
~~ (*)/  (*)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Liz  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 12:39 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "Liz" <l...@chows.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:39:34 GMT
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 12:39 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
"Boostland" <Boostl...@kooragangcycling.asn.au> wrote in message

news:477f0f0f$0$5448$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com...

I don't know about Victoria, but in Sydney there's no special rule and it's
pretty much at the discretion of whatever rail staff you happen to come
across. My husband and I both independantly asked the helpline and both
times the person who answered had to ask their supervisor and came back with
the answer that if you can pick it up and carry it, it counts as luggage (we
didn't point out that you can actually pick up and carry an unfolded bike).
However, one particular ticket seller insisted on my buying an extra ticket
for the bike, despite being told this, pretty much on the grounds of "a
bike's a bike".

Cheers,
Liz


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Boostland  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 2:32 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "Boostland" <Boostl...@kooragangcycling.asn.au>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:32:16 +1100
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 2:32 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"Liz" <l...@chows.com> wrote in message

news:qjWfj.24$421.5@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

Easy to fix put bike in bag or suitcase then it is luggage ;)

Brompton Travel Case
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJJ7zakGLbw

Bike Friday Travel Case that is also a trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYOhcJtxmpg

Bike Friday soft bag
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eUmBfSgU5w

I wonder what they would say to a normal sized bike with wheels removed
inside a large soft bag, might be a way to get around the no bike rule :P
Would have to read the rules about luggage size to confirm.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zebee Johnstone  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 2:46 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: Zebee Johnstone <zeb...@gmail.com>
Date: 6 Jan 2008 03:46:30 GMT
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 2:46 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
In aus.bicycle on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:51:23 GMT

PeteSig <pete...@bigpond.com> wrote:

> "DJ"  wrote:

>> carriage and someone gets on the train with a wet bike with some mud
>> splashed up the side of it or just dirty water from the roads, rubbed up
>> against your suit or workclothes,

> And say you had a need to take your bike on a train, and had chosen a
> carriage that was not packed full?? And the bike was clean?

Except that the reason they are banned is because they are full.

Will you have an inspector who will check bikes for cleanliness before
they are allowed on?  Will you agree that if there are more than X
people on the train at any one time all cyclists are thrown off at the
next station?

>> or worse still, you get scraped along the leg with a sharp end of a pedal
>> or chainwheel or it rips your suit leg to peices, just because the bike
>> was in the carriage,

> Some people just lack gross motor skills, I know.

Some do, yes.  Elderly people, those with some varieties of MS, those
with injuries, those with some balance problems, some people with
Downs Syndrome, some people who are tired.

I am unsure why they don't count.

> One thing all our crap train carriages lack is overhead straps and rails, so
> that stops and starts are not such a threat. Why blame the cyclist? We had
> plenty of straps and open spaces in the old carriages of the 70s and 80s.

OPen spaces are usually about lack of people.  What's the population
of the city and the numbers using trains now compared to them?

>> It's like on a bus, at no time are bicycles allowed on a bus due to the
>> tight confines of that type of vehicle.

> Yes, but they can be carried on external rails vis. Brisbane and Canberra
> buses

How many?  And how much time does it take to insert and remove?
Should other passengers have to wait?

Zebee


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zebee Johnstone  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 2:49 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: Zebee Johnstone <zeb...@gmail.com>
Date: 6 Jan 2008 03:49:45 GMT
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 2:49 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
In aus.bicycle on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:39:34 GMT

Liz <l...@chows.com> wrote:
> I don't know about Victoria, but in Sydney there's no special rule and it's
> pretty much at the discretion of whatever rail staff you happen to come
> across. My husband and I both independantly asked the helpline and both

to quote:

Bicycles - standard, folding and disassembled - travel free in
non-peak periods. You will need to purchase a child ticket as well as
your own if you wish to travel with a bicycle between the hours of
6.00am and 9.00am and 3.30pm and 7.30pm on weekdays.

to me that makes it clear that a "bicycle" includes a folding one,
even folded.  So presumably a large backpack is OK but a folder in a
bag is not...  It also appears that a bike in a bike bag or box is
also banned on peak hours, but a bar fridge would be OK.

I suspect that most staff would not care about a folder in a bag, but
might care about one out of a bag.

I have been asked to show a 2nd ticket for the 'bent towards the end
of evening peak, but being a disgustingly law abiding type I had
bought one.

Zebee


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
DJ  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 3:27 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "DJ" <mrj...@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:27:18 +1100
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 3:27 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"Zebee Johnstone" <zeb...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:slrnfo0jup.k4d.zebeej@gmail.com...

I remember one weekend i took my bicycle on the train from Mac Flds to the
city(Syd) and got chatting to 2 of those city rail ticket checkers on the
train going in and i was telling them about BUGs and what they do and some
of the rides we go etc etc and kept them chatting untill we got to
Kingsgrove where they got off to go back on another train...they didn't even
ask if i had a ticket for myself let alone the bike...mmm good diversion i
thought....

But yeah, in the peak time in Sydney you just buy a child ticket for the
bike then no probs usually except you might get a few growls from passengers
in a packed carriage....i had one guy say to me one night "why don't you
ride the f'ing thing home"? and I said "why don't you walk home? he shut up
then....it helps when you don't reply with obsenities back as it makes you
look better than those who do...sometimes!!  lol

I must say though, i wouldn't mind betting that some day soon if the petrol
prices go higher and higher and more people opt for the train that cityrail
could bring in the 'no bikes in peaktime' policy..wouldn't put it past them.

DJ


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
G-S  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 7:03 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: G-S <ge...@castbus.com.au>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:03:06 +1100
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 7:03 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

Zebee Johnstone wrote:

>>> It's like on a bus, at no time are bicycles allowed on a bus due to the
>>> tight confines of that type of vehicle.
>> Yes, but they can be carried on external rails vis. Brisbane and Canberra
>> buses

> How many?  And how much time does it take to insert and remove?
> Should other passengers have to wait?

> Zebee

I've been researching these... it's my estimate that we have sufficient
'slack time' in our timetables not to need to alter them.

ie buses currently wait at main stops (waste time) in order not to be early.

That is the case with a fair proportion of rural/suburban services down
in Vic... not sure about NSW though, and it isn't the case in inner city
areas either.

G-S


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
beerwolf  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 7:54 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "beerwolf" <beerw...@REMfastOVEmail.com.au>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:54:39 GMT
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 7:54 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

Liz wrote:

... snip

I rarely use public transport these days; however if I ever find myself
in the position of wanting to take my folding bike on a train in Sydney
peak hour, I fully intend to *not* purchase a ticket, and if the transit
police issue a fine, I fully intend to contest it through the courts. I
think
there is an arguable case that a folding bike (in a bag) is not a bike.

Getting back to the original topic, I've spent the last  3 months living
and working in Melbourne, commuting 30km both ways each day
with one exception when I used the train. The trip home that day was
enough to convince me that almost anything would be preferable to
a peak hour train trip in Melbourne, with or without a bike.
That 'almost anything' arrived just before Christmas, when a severe
afternoon thunderstorm sent me to Parliament station with my bike
for the trip home. I would have happily paid a quadruple fare; luckily
the train had enough space for both of us, and the bike was free.

I can see both side of the issue too - I think any lobbying should
encompass a willingness to pay a surcharge of some kind for the bike.

--
beerwolf


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
DJ  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 8:13 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "DJ" <mrj...@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:13:29 +1100
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 8:13 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"G-S" <ge...@castbus.com.au> wrote in message

news:13o12prolvglm72@corp.supernews.com...

That may well be in the slack periods early in the morning (first services)
and late in the evening (after 7.30pm or 8pm) and on some holiday periods
like it is right now but generally in my experience having been a Sydney
Buses driver for 18 years (not at the moment though) in those above
mentioned times, they tend to tighten up the timetable so they can get more
trips in per operating bus for eg. instead of doing 2 round trips in/out of
city per half shift, they'll be timetabling for 3 round trips.

I was up in Brisbane for 9 months recently and in that whole time i think i
seen 2 bikes on those front racks so i don't know if they have been a paying
proposition.
I think people have to realise that with buses, they try to cater for most
of the travelling public but it's bloody hard trying to cater for all
purposes.
I know when they first bought out those low floor wheelchair buses about 7
years ago, i think i have carried about 6 wheelchair passengers in 5 years.

DJ


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zebee Johnstone  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 9:18 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: Zebee Johnstone <zeb...@gmail.com>
Date: 6 Jan 2008 10:18:27 GMT
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 9:18 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
In aus.bicycle on Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:13:29 +1100

DJ <mrj...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> I know when they first bought out those low floor wheelchair buses about 7
> years ago, i think i have carried about 6 wheelchair passengers in 5 years.

I've seen elderly passengers being quite thankful for those.  Ditto
people with prams.

Long ago when I was young, Perth buses used to carry prams on racks on
the back of the bus.  They stopped it, I believe because of the hassle
the drivers had doing the loading and unloading as not all pram owners
could manage it.

When I was working in North Sydney I used to take the train home if I
was late home of an evening and couldn't be arsed facing the hills.

No point trying to get the bike on in peak hour though!

I expect the 'bent wouldn't fit on a bus bicycle rack anyway.

Zebee


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
G-S  
View profile  
 More options Jan 6 2008, 9:34 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: G-S <ge...@castbus.com.au>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:34:54 +1100
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2008 9:34 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

Spot on Zebee... our feedback is that marginally mobile older passengers
(off peak mostly) absolutely love the newer low floor buses, and so do
mums with prams.

None of that is very relevant to peak hour bus usage, but that isn't the
pattern encountered with outer suburban/rural bus services anyway.

And as far as I can tell some bents would fit but others would not; long
wheelbase ones definitely not (the racks can after all be no wider than
a bus) but shorter wheelbase/larger wheel types should be ok.

G-S


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
TimC  
View profile  
 More options Jan 7 2008, 2:06 am
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: TimC <tconn...@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:06:15 +1100
Local: Mon, Jan 7 2008 2:06 am
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
On 2008-01-06, Zebee Johnstone (aka Bruce)
  was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

> to me that makes it clear that a "bicycle" includes a folding one,
> even folded.  So presumably a large backpack is OK but a folder in a
> bag is not...  It also appears that a bike in a bike bag or box is
> also banned on peak hours, but a bar fridge would be OK.

Ahhh, Chasers, how I love thee.

--
TimC
I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your
phone 90 degrees and try again.               -- MIT's phone switch


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
EuanB  
View profile  
 More options Jan 7 2008, 10:14 am
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: EuanB <EuanB.32s...@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:14:22 +1100
Local: Mon, Jan 7 2008 10:14 am
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

AndrewJ Wrote:

> Anyone got experience of riding the Bay bike path to and from
> Mordialloc to the city? I tried to find information on ithe current
> state, but nothing of substance on bv site. From the google images it
> seems ok. Yes, I know it's slow, but I'm
> not in a hurry.

IMO Nepean Highway is not only quicker, it's much safer.

I've ridden the Bay trail, the sight lines are poor and there's way too
many intersections where priority is not recognised.  Add in joggers,
dog walkers etc etc and it can be an unpredictable enviornment compared
to the road.

--
EuanB


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
PeteSig  
View profile  
 More options Jan 7 2008, 5:12 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: "PeteSig" <pete...@bigpond.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:12:12 GMT
Local: Mon, Jan 7 2008 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.

"Zebee Johnstone"  wrote:
> In aus.bicycle on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:51:23 GMT
> PeteSig <pete...@bigpond.com> wrote:

>> "DJ"  wrote:

>>> carriage and someone gets on the train with a wet bike with some mud
>>> splashed up the side of it or just dirty water from the roads, rubbed up
>>> against your suit or workclothes,

>> And say you had a need to take your bike on a train, and had chosen a
>> carriage that was not packed full?? And the bike was clean?

> Except that the reason they are banned is because they are full.

But often they are NOT. Eg. before 4.30pm and after 6.00pm. But the ban
still applies.

> Will you have an inspector who will check bikes for cleanliness before
> they are allowed on?  Will you agree that if there are more than X
> people on the train at any one time all cyclists are thrown off at the
> next station?

No. Leave it up to reasonable people to make a sensible decision. Like they
will with pram-users/people with lots of luggage.

>> One thing all our crap train carriages lack is overhead straps and rails,
>> so
>> that stops and starts are not such a threat. Why blame the cyclist? We
>> had
>> plenty of straps and open spaces in the old carriages of the 70s and 80s.

> OPen spaces are usually about lack of people.  What's the population
> of the city and the numbers using trains now compared to them?

No, open spaces, where there were no seats. Standing room, with straps to
hold onto. FAR more people can be accomodated with standing room, and in
off-peak there's still more than enough seats, and space to carry bikes out
of the doorways. Talk to travellers overseas - most of the mass rail systems
in NY, Tokyo, London have carriages with standing spaces, some are almost
all standing room with only seats along the sides of the carriages.

And yes, bikes may well be banned there, but these cities have much greater
population densities and PT use. Personally I think the idea of paying a
concession fare for a bike in peak periods was a good one. But this was
dropped by the Met, for some reason. Maybe too hard to police ??

--
Cheers
Peter

~~~ ~ _@
~~ ~ _- \,
~~ (*)/  (*)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zebee Johnstone  
View profile  
 More options Jan 7 2008, 5:59 pm
Newsgroups: aus.bicycle
From: Zebee Johnstone <zeb...@gmail.com>
Date: 7 Jan 2008 06:59:26 GMT
Local: Mon, Jan 7 2008 5:59 pm
Subject: Re: Crap respsonse from Connex about bikes on trains.
In aus.bicycle on Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:12:12 GMT

PeteSig <pete...@bigpond.com> wrote:

> "Zebee Johnstone"  wrote:
>> Except that the reason they are banned is because they are full.

> But often they are NOT. Eg. before 4.30pm and after 6.00pm. But the ban
> still applies.

The problem is that sometimes they are.  

>> Will you have an inspector who will check bikes for cleanliness before
>> they are allowed on?  Will you agree that if there are more than X
>> people on the train at any one time all cyclists are thrown off at the
>> next station?

> No. Leave it up to reasonable people to make a sensible decision. Like they
> will with pram-users/people with lots of luggage.

Do they?  NOt in my experience.

People are selfish.  Some people will not be too selfish, some will.
And unclear rules lead to arguments and anger.

HOw much will new carriages cost, and who will pay?

Zebee


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 76   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google