I suffer from SEVERE depression and so can't work. I need a laptop computer. I went to steal one from the shop we have here in the USA called Electronics City and I became very disheartened. This is because the laptop was attached to a kind of cable and it also seemed to have some kind of alarm system attached to it's USB slot. Anyone here be kind enough to tell me of a way you've figured around this security system?
On a side note, If I do manage to somehow get the laptop free from the damn wires, how do I get them past the electronic tags they have at the exits? I mean, if i carry the laptop over my head, above the height of the electronic scanners, or even if I pass the laptop on the side of the electronic tags away from the door (in the gap between the electronic sensor and the rest of the store), will the alarms still go off? What I'm trying to say is, do the electric scanners at the exists have 360 degree coverage, or is the coverage only between the gaps between the 2 sensors?
Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free laptop? Thanks and bye friends.
> I suffer from SEVERE depression and so can't work. I need a laptop > computer. I went to steal one from the shop we have here in the USA > called Electronics City and I became very disheartened. This is > because the > laptop was attached to a kind of cable and it also seemed to have some > kind of alarm system attached to it's USB slot. Anyone here be kind > enough to tell me of a way you've figured around this security > system?
> On a side note, If I do manage to somehow get the laptop free from the > damn wires, how do I get them past the electronic tags they have at > the exits? I mean, if i carry the laptop over my head, above the > height of the electronic scanners, or even if I pass the laptop on the > side of the electronic tags away from the door (in the gap between > the electronic sensor and the rest of the store), will the alarms > still go off? What I'm trying to say is, do the electric scanners at > the exists have 360 degree coverage, or is the coverage only between > the gaps between the 2 sensors?
> Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone > here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free > laptop? Thanks and bye friends.
Why am I thinking dr Baf didnt write this? Tom in Ct
> I suffer from SEVERE depression and so can't work. I need a laptop > computer. I went to steal one from the shop we have here in the USA > called Electronics City and I became very disheartened. This is > because the > laptop was attached to a kind of cable and it also seemed to have some > kind of alarm system attached to it's USB slot. Anyone here be kind > enough to tell me of a way you've figured around this security > system?
> On a side note, If I do manage to somehow get the laptop free from the > damn wires, how do I get them past the electronic tags they have at > the exits? I mean, if i carry the laptop over my head, above the > height of the electronic scanners, or even if I pass the laptop on the > side of the electronic tags away from the door (in the gap between > the electronic sensor and the rest of the store), will the alarms > still go off? What I'm trying to say is, do the electric scanners at > the exists have 360 degree coverage, or is the coverage only between > the gaps between the 2 sensors?
> Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone > here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free > laptop? Thanks and bye friends.
Don't worry Dr baf, since you have severe depression Obama will have the goverment give you a laptop as part of the health care bill. Ronald Emerson. Is it June 2010 yet?
> I suffer from SEVERE depression and so can't work. I need a laptop > computer. I went to steal one from the shop we have here in the USA > called Electronics City and I became very disheartened. This is > because the > laptop was attached to a kind of cable and it also seemed to have some > kind of alarm system attached to it's USB slot. Anyone here be kind > enough to tell me of a way you've figured around this security > system?
> On a side note, If I do manage to somehow get the laptop free from the > damn wires, how do I get them past the electronic tags they have at > the exits? I mean, if i carry the laptop over my head, above the > height of the electronic scanners, or even if I pass the laptop on the > side of the electronic tags away from the door (in the gap between > the electronic sensor and the rest of the store), will the alarms > still go off? What I'm trying to say is, do the electric scanners at > the exists have 360 degree coverage, or is the coverage only between > the gaps between the 2 sensors?
> Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone > here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free > laptop? Thanks and bye friends.
Why am I thinking dr Baf didnt write this? Tom in Ct
Of course he didn't, he was out using match plays. -- Joe J. in LV
On Sep 30, 5:52 pm, "dr. Baf" <slaza...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On a side note, If I do manage to somehow get the laptop free from the > damn wires, how do I get them past the electronic tags they have at > the exits? I mean, if i carry the laptop over my head, above the > height of the electronic scanners, or even if I pass the laptop on the > side of the electronic tags away from the door (in the gap between > the electronic sensor and the rest of the store), will the alarms > still go off? What I'm trying to say is, do the electric scanners at > the exists have 360 degree coverage, or is the coverage only between > the gaps between the 2 sensors?
As long as you carry the laptop over your head AND wrap it in your underwear while singin' the Battle Hymn of the Republic the sensors won't go off.....
dr. Baf wrote: > I suffer from SEVERE depression and so can't work. I need a laptop > computer. I went to steal one from the shop we have here in the USA > called Electronics City and I became very disheartened. This is > because the > laptop was attached to a kind of cable and it also seemed to have some > kind of alarm system attached to it's USB slot. Anyone here be kind > enough to tell me of a way you've figured around this security > system?
> On a side note, If I do manage to somehow get the laptop free from the > damn wires, how do I get them past the electronic tags they have at > the exits? I mean, if i carry the laptop over my head, above the > height of the electronic scanners, or even if I pass the laptop on the > side of the electronic tags away from the door (in the gap between > the electronic sensor and the rest of the store), will the alarms > still go off? What I'm trying to say is, do the electric scanners at > the exists have 360 degree coverage, or is the coverage only between > the gaps between the 2 sensors?
> Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone > here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free > laptop? Thanks and bye friends.
a) Those laptops in displays usually have no batteries, and the power cable is fed through a small hole into a power strip in a locked cabin underneath. No power, useless laptop; unless you can score a compatable replacement power cable and/or battery.
b) If you are on any kind of benefits for disability, and you get arrested and charged with a felony, your disability payments will stop, and you'll go to jail.
c) Freecycle or a thrift shop. Won't be the latest with bells-n-whistles, but it'll be free or cheap.
d) If you are just trolling, NOTA applies to you.
-- Carol Contessa of Consternation Known to leave foes discombobulated
> dr. Baf wrote: > > I suffer from SEVERE depression and so can't work. I need a laptop > > computer. I went to steal one from the shop we have here in the USA > > called Electronics City and I became very disheartened. This is > > because the > > laptop was attached to a kind of cable and it also seemed to have some > > kind of alarm system attached to it's USB slot. Anyone here be kind > > enough to tell me of a way you've figured around this security > > system?
> > On a side note, If I do manage to somehow get the laptop free from the > > damn wires, how do I get them past the electronic tags they have at > > the exits? I mean, if i carry the laptop over my head, above the > > height of the electronic scanners, or even if I pass the laptop on the > > side of the electronic tags away from the door (in the gap between > > the electronic sensor and the rest of the store), will the alarms > > still go off? What I'm trying to say is, do the electric scanners at > > the exists have 360 degree coverage, or is the coverage only between > > the gaps between the 2 sensors?
> > Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone > > here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free > > laptop? Thanks and bye friends.
> a) Those laptops in displays usually have no batteries, and the power cable > is fed through a small hole into a power strip in a locked cabin underneath. > No power, useless laptop; unless you can score a compatable replacement > power cable and/or battery.
> b) If you are on any kind of benefits for disability, and you get arrested > and charged with a felony, your disability payments will stop, and you'll go > to jail.
> c) Freecycle or a thrift shop. Won't be the latest with bells-n-whistles, > but it'll be free or cheap.
> d) If you are just trolling, NOTA applies to you.
> -- > Carol > Contessa of Consternation > Known to leave foes discombobulated
> >On Oct 5, 5:40 pm, I LOVE CHEESEWHEELS > ><cheesewhe...@crazyfactory.cheese> wrote: > >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT), "dr. Baf" > >> <slaza...@yahoo.com> wrote this stuff here :
> >> >Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone > >> >here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free > >> >laptop?
> >> The easiest way to steal anything is to join/become a member of the > >> Republican party.
> >Better than joining the party of that loser with barely a 50% approval > >rating.
> Uh, this was said when he had 70%+ and again at 65%, then 62%
So the worse the rating the better he is huh?
> Every time he gets a new approval ratings the THUGLICUNTS say "He is > barely holding on to a INSERT LOWEST POLLING DATA NUMBER HERE." > Then insert something about his wife's looks.
She DOES look like a baboon. Jackie O. she ain't :-)
> It's beyond dumb to think this economy is Obama's fault with under 9 > months in office compared to all that republican utopia for the past 8 > years. I suppose we could blame clinton too, I'm sure some radio host > will skip W and blame this on clinton./..
''
Bill Clinton did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour a house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in packages could be insured, cost several trillion in bailouts, 60 minutes said several time more than the Iraq war.
>"Usenet Legends bobandcarole ????" <usenetlegends00...@gmail.com> wrote in >message >news:503c26e9-0a1f-4dc7-a9d1-6f76d0d5abcb@d34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... >x-no-archive: >> >On Oct 5, 5:40 pm, I LOVE CHEESEWHEELS >> ><cheesewhe...@crazyfactory.cheese> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT), "dr. Baf" >> >> <slaza...@yahoo.com> wrote this stuff here :
>> >> >Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone >> >> >here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free >> >> >laptop?
>> >> The easiest way to steal anything is to join/become a member of the >> >> Republican party.
>> >Better than joining the party of that loser with barely a 50% approval >> >rating.
>> Uh, this was said when he had 70%+ and again at 65%, then 62%
>So the worse the rating the better he is huh?
>> Every time he gets a new approval ratings the THUGLICUNTS say "He is >> barely holding on to a INSERT LOWEST POLLING DATA NUMBER HERE." >> Then insert something about his wife's looks.
>She DOES look like a baboon. >Jackie O. she ain't :-)
>> It's beyond dumb to think this economy is Obama's fault with under 9 >> months in office compared to all that republican utopia for the past 8 >> years. I suppose we could blame clinton too, I'm sure some radio host >> will skip W and blame this on clinton./..
>''
>Bill Clinton did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour a >house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in packages could be >insured, cost several trillion in bailouts, 60 minutes said several time >more than the Iraq war.
Clinton couldn't amend anything (because he did not have the authority)--but the Republican't Congress could, and did. So, you are now formally acknowledging the Republican'ts "did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour a house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in packages could be insured, cost several trillion in bailouts, 60 minutes said several time more than the Iraq war".
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:38:13 -0800, "bobinNY" > <B...@eqifax.com> wrote:
>>"Usenet Legends bobandcarole ????" <usenetlegends00...@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:503c26e9-0a1f-4dc7-a9d1-6f76d0d5abcb@d34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... >>x-no-archive: >>> >On Oct 5, 5:40 pm, I LOVE CHEESEWHEELS >>> ><cheesewhe...@crazyfactory.cheese> wrote: >>> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT), "dr. Baf" >>> >> <slaza...@yahoo.com> wrote this stuff here :
>>> >> >Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone >>> >> >here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free >>> >> >laptop?
>>> >> The easiest way to steal anything is to join/become a member of the >>> >> Republican party.
>>> >Better than joining the party of that loser with barely a 50% approval >>> >rating.
>>> Uh, this was said when he had 70%+ and again at 65%, then 62%
>>So the worse the rating the better he is huh?
>>> Every time he gets a new approval ratings the THUGLICUNTS say "He is >>> barely holding on to a INSERT LOWEST POLLING DATA NUMBER HERE." >>> Then insert something about his wife's looks.
>>She DOES look like a baboon. >>Jackie O. she ain't :-)
>>> It's beyond dumb to think this economy is Obama's fault with under 9 >>> months in office compared to all that republican utopia for the past 8 >>> years. I suppose we could blame clinton too, I'm sure some radio host >>> will skip W and blame this on clinton./..
>>''
>>Bill Clinton did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour a >>house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in packages could be >>insured, cost several trillion in bailouts, 60 minutes said several time >>more than the Iraq war.
> Clinton couldn't amend anything (because he did not have the > authority)--but the Republican't Congress could, and did. > So, you are now formally acknowledging the Republican'ts > "did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour > a house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in > packages could be insured, cost several trillion in > bailouts, 60 minutes said several time more than the Iraq > war".
BIl Clinton sigend the bill, He was the CEO, Commander in Chief, Obama said out loud, the buck stop here, which presidents does the buck not stop here with, was his staff getting blow jobs? Bush was blamed for IRAQ because he was CEO even though dem congress approved going to war. bottom line is Clinton said he wanted people to get houses and he pushed and was in favor of it, if we no longer hold leaders accountable we are going to have too many enrons. Legalizing derrivitives was a HUGE mistake.
>>>"Usenet Legends bobandcarole ????" <usenetlegends00...@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:503c26e9-0a1f-4dc7-a9d1-6f76d0d5abcb@d34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... >>>x-no-archive: >>>> >On Oct 5, 5:40 pm, I LOVE CHEESEWHEELS >>>> ><cheesewhe...@crazyfactory.cheese> wrote: >>>> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT), "dr. Baf" >>>> >> <slaza...@yahoo.com> wrote this stuff here :
>>>> >> >Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone >>>> >> >here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free >>>> >> >laptop?
>>>> >> The easiest way to steal anything is to join/become a member of the >>>> >> Republican party.
>>>> >Better than joining the party of that loser with barely a 50% approval >>>> >rating.
>>>> Uh, this was said when he had 70%+ and again at 65%, then 62%
>>>So the worse the rating the better he is huh?
>>>> Every time he gets a new approval ratings the THUGLICUNTS say "He is >>>> barely holding on to a INSERT LOWEST POLLING DATA NUMBER HERE." >>>> Then insert something about his wife's looks.
>>>She DOES look like a baboon. >>>Jackie O. she ain't :-)
>>>> It's beyond dumb to think this economy is Obama's fault with under 9 >>>> months in office compared to all that republican utopia for the past 8 >>>> years. I suppose we could blame clinton too, I'm sure some radio host >>>> will skip W and blame this on clinton./..
>>>''
>>>Bill Clinton did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour a >>>house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in packages could be >>>insured, cost several trillion in bailouts, 60 minutes said several time >>>more than the Iraq war.
>> Clinton couldn't amend anything (because he did not have the >> authority)--but the Republican't Congress could, and did. >> So, you are now formally acknowledging the Republican'ts >> "did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour >> a house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in >> packages could be insured, cost several trillion in >> bailouts, 60 minutes said several time more than the Iraq >> war".
>BIl Clinton sigend the bill, He was the CEO, Commander in Chief, Obama said >out loud, the buck stop here, which presidents does the buck not stop here >with, was his staff getting blow jobs? Bush was blamed for IRAQ because he >was CEO even though dem congress approved going to war. bottom line is >Clinton said he wanted people to get houses and he pushed and was in favor >of it, if we no longer hold leaders accountable we are going to have too >many enrons. Legalizing derrivitives was a HUGE mistake.
Good try, but you failed again.
Congressional Republican'ts attached their law as an amendment to a "must pass" bill at the last bill--thus meaning the US govt would be shut down if it was not passed. Plus, there were no problems under Clinton--because the regulations were not changed. GWB and the Repblican't Congress essentially removed the regulations they were supposed to enforce--thus permitting bad loans to become the predominent factor in the second GWB economic collapse--this one in 2007.
> > On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:38:13 -0800, "bobinNY" > > <B...@eqifax.com> wrote:
> >>"Usenet Legends bobandcarole ????" <usenetlegends00...@gmail.com> wrote in > >>message > >>news:503c26e9-0a1f-4dc7-a9d1-6f76d0d5abcb@d34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... > >>x-no-archive: > >>> >On Oct 5, 5:40 pm, I LOVE CHEESEWHEELS > >>> ><cheesewhe...@crazyfactory.cheese> wrote: > >>> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT), "dr. Baf" > >>> >> <slaza...@yahoo.com> wrote this stuff here :
> >>> >> >Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can anyone > >>> >> >here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free > >>> >> >laptop?
> >>> >> The easiest way to steal anything is to join/become a member of the > >>> >> Republican party.
> >>> >Better than joining the party of that loser with barely a 50% approval > >>> >rating.
> >>> Uh, this was said when he had 70%+ and again at 65%, then 62%
> >>So the worse the rating the better he is huh?
> >>> Every time he gets a new approval ratings the THUGLICUNTS say "He is > >>> barely holding on to a INSERT LOWEST POLLING DATA NUMBER HERE." > >>> Then insert something about his wife's looks.
> >>She DOES look like a baboon. > >>Jackie O. she ain't :-)
> >>> It's beyond dumb to think this economy is Obama's fault with under 9 > >>> months in office compared to all that republican utopia for the past 8 > >>> years. I suppose we could blame clinton too, I'm sure some radio host > >>> will skip W and blame this on clinton./..
> >>''
> >>Bill Clinton did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour a > >>house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in packages could be > >>insured, cost several trillion in bailouts, 60 minutes said several time > >>more than the Iraq war.
> > Clinton couldn't amend anything (because he did not have the > > authority)--but the Republican't Congress could, and did. > > So, you are now formally acknowledging the Republican'ts > > "did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour > > a house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in > > packages could be insured, cost several trillion in > > bailouts, 60 minutes said several time more than the Iraq > > war".
> BIl Clinton sigend the bill,
----< He signed it because republicans had a clear majority and would have overidden a veto anyway.
He was the CEO, Commander in Chief, Obama said
> out loud, the buck stop here, which presidents does the buck not stop here > with, was his staff getting blow jobs? Bush was blamed for IRAQ because he > was CEO even though dem congress approved going to war.
--> It was a rebublican congress
b ottom line is
> Clinton said he wanted people to get houses and he pushed and was in favor > of it, if we no longer hold leaders accountable we are going to have too > many enrons. Legalizing derrivitives was a HUGE mistake.- Hide quoted text -
----< The entire housing bubble happened from 2001-2005..under a republican congress and president.
>>>>"Usenet Legends bobandcarole ????" <usenetlegends00...@gmail.com> wrote >>>>in >>>>message >>>>news:503c26e9-0a1f-4dc7-a9d1-6f76d0d5abcb@d34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... >>>>x-no-archive: >>>>> >On Oct 5, 5:40 pm, I LOVE CHEESEWHEELS >>>>> ><cheesewhe...@crazyfactory.cheese> wrote: >>>>> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT), "dr. Baf" >>>>> >> <slaza...@yahoo.com> wrote this stuff here :
>>>>> >> >Finally, if stealing from the electric store is too hard, can >>>>> >> >anyone >>>>> >> >here be kind enough to tell me of an easier way to scam a free >>>>> >> >laptop?
>>>>> >> The easiest way to steal anything is to join/become a member of the >>>>> >> Republican party.
>>>>> >Better than joining the party of that loser with barely a 50% >>>>> >approval >>>>> >rating.
>>>>> Uh, this was said when he had 70%+ and again at 65%, then 62%
>>>>So the worse the rating the better he is huh?
>>>>> Every time he gets a new approval ratings the THUGLICUNTS say "He is >>>>> barely holding on to a INSERT LOWEST POLLING DATA NUMBER HERE." >>>>> Then insert something about his wife's looks.
>>>>She DOES look like a baboon. >>>>Jackie O. she ain't :-)
>>>>> It's beyond dumb to think this economy is Obama's fault with under 9 >>>>> months in office compared to all that republican utopia for the past 8 >>>>> years. I suppose we could blame clinton too, I'm sure some radio host >>>>> will skip W and blame this on clinton./..
>>>>''
>>>>Bill Clinton did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour >>>>a >>>>house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in packages could be >>>>insured, cost several trillion in bailouts, 60 minutes said several time >>>>more than the Iraq war.
>>> Clinton couldn't amend anything (because he did not have the >>> authority)--but the Republican't Congress could, and did. >>> So, you are now formally acknowledging the Republican'ts >>> "did amend fannie mae to give people making 10 bucks a hour >>> a house, then legalized derrivitives so morgages sold in >>> packages could be insured, cost several trillion in >>> bailouts, 60 minutes said several time more than the Iraq >>> war".
>>BIl Clinton sigend the bill, He was the CEO, Commander in Chief, Obama >>said >>out loud, the buck stop here, which presidents does the buck not stop here >>with, was his staff getting blow jobs? Bush was blamed for IRAQ because >>he >>was CEO even though dem congress approved going to war. bottom line is >>Clinton said he wanted people to get houses and he pushed and was in favor >>of it, if we no longer hold leaders accountable we are going to have too >>many enrons. Legalizing derrivitives was a HUGE mistake.
> Good try, but you failed again.
> Congressional Republican'ts attached their law as an > amendment to a "must pass" bill at the last bill--thus > meaning the US govt would be shut down if it was not passed. > Plus, there were no problems under Clinton--because the > regulations were not changed. GWB and the Repblican't > Congress essentially removed the regulations they were > supposed to enforce--thus permitting bad loans to become the > predominent factor in the second GWB economic collapse--this > one in 2007.
When someone hits your nose does crap shoot out your ears?
|
