Message from discussion
MARBURY SPEAKS
Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!f5ae6555!not-for-mail
From: "Glenn Greenstein" <glen.jack...@worldnet.att.net>
Newsgroups: alt.sports.basketball.pro.ny-knicks
References: <bo9v549dr3fqudu32vt8g933qhj572mua4@4ax.com> <slrng5vacs.55a.pablos@coruscant.stwing.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: MARBURY SPEAKS
Lines: 38
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Message-ID: <xCP7k.67527$102.64109@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9204d0c63fbb60149ec9ee05b5b1cd7a
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1214236189 9204d0c63fbb60149ec9ee05b5b1cd7a (Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:49:49 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:49:49 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:49:49 GMT
"Pablo" <pab...@stwing.spmBGone.org> wrote in message
news:slrng5vacs.55a.pablos@coruscant.stwing.upenn.edu...
> Syfo-Dyas wrote:
>> By MARC BERMAN
>>
>> Had Thomas stayed in power, Marbury said he knows his contract would
>> have been bought out after the season. In an interview with The Post
>> yesterday, Marbury said his contract was nearly bought out in November
>> amidst the Nov. 13 Phoenix fiasco, when Marbury left the Knicks
>> reportedly because he wasn't going to start anymore.
>>
>> According to Marbury, Thomas did not just want him out of the starting
>> lineup for Mardy CollinsMardy Collins in November, Thomas wanted him
>> out of the organization and sent him home to have his contract bought
>> out. Marbury said he still doesn't know how things changed the next
>> day, when summoned back to Phoenix, the talk of a buyout history.
>>
>
> Not to defend Marbury's actions, but this is actually a plausible
> explaination for Marbury's disappearance, and his subsequent re-insertion
> into the lineup. If Thomas says to Marbs, "you're fired, go home," it
> seems like a reasonable thing to comply. If subsequently it turns out
> that Isiah didn't in fact have the power to buy Marbury out, since as we
> speculated, he appeared to be handcuffed last season, it makes sense that
> Marbury be allowed to rejoin the team.
>
> Marbury's clearly a nutcase and a loser, but I don't find it difficult to
> believe that the November fiasco was entirely due to the incompetance and
> mismanagement of Isiah Thomas.
>
> =p=
That's pretty much what I thought after the team voted to keep him on the
bench and Thomas played him in spite of that. It looked to me as if Thomas
owed Steph something.