> What have fellow b-lister Republicans John Ratzenberger and Pee Wee Herman said > about Obama lately?
> Say! Why the change? You always abhorred entertainers contributing their > opinions about politics and current events. Now, you can't stop parroting the > spews of entertainers like Limbaugh, Voight, O'Reilly, Hannity and Beck.
> Looks like the rightists are out of ammunition and desperate. And don't forget > that you're a Canadian, living in Canada whose only contribution to US right > wing politics is making an ass out of yourself and the $2 a month you pay for > Fox News on Canadian cable.
> You have no vote and can't even make a political contribution, if you were able > to afford it that is.
> How's that Canadian health care treating you? It must be pretty good if you're > still not living in the good old USA where you would need to foot the bill on > your own.
*** No, you wouldn't, dickhead. There is Medicare and Medicaide. This is not the best, of course, because like Canada's system they are government run.
Being an old fool, your annual premium would likely be 30,000 a
On Nov 6, 5:42 am, Cold Lazarus <coldlaza...@ymail.com> wrote:
> Say! Why the change? You always abhorred entertainers contributing their > opinions about politics and current events. Now, you can't stop parroting the > spews of entertainers like Limbaugh, Voight, O'Reilly, Hannity and Beck.
This is a PERFECT example of Lambourns hard-wired intellectual dishonesty. When an entertainer disagrees with Lambourn, Lambourn sneers that "he's only an entertainer." When an entertainer agrees with Lambourn, he's cited as an authority. Lambourn is so deeply immersed in his dishonest thinking that he does this without a shred of embarrassment, totally clueless of the damage this kind of contradiction does to his reputation and credability.
|
