>On Nov 6, 10:37Êam, "Not Defined" <farce5...@newsrover.com> wrote:
>> lab~rat Ê>:-) wrote:
>> > On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 06:35:21 -0800 (PST), wy <w...@myself.com> puked:

>> > >On Nov 6, 9:31Jam, Geo <taxpayer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> On Nov 6, 9:00Jam, "Not Defined" <farce5...@newsrover.com> wrote:

>> > >> > Unemployment hit 10.2 percent in October, the highest rate since
>> > April >> > 1983 and much higher than analysts expected.

>> > >> > Obama promised no more than 8%. Has he failed already?

>> > >> Nah, I'd say with the under-stated unemployment rate combined with
>> > >> quadrupling the deficit, projected doubling of national debt and
>> > ever >> present push to grow the nanny state you have nothing short of
>> > >> unbridled success.

>> > > Nah, it's only a success when he surpasses Reagan's 10.8%
>> > > unemployment peak.

>> >http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Jobless-rate-tops-10-pct-for-apf-5631229
>> > 44.html?x=0&.v=8

>> > Counting those who have settled for part-time jobs or stopped looking
>> > for work, the unemployment rate would be 17.5 percent, the highest on
>> > records dating from 1994.

>> Are you saying that after less than a year on the job, Obama is fast
>> becoming the worst president in history?

>Bush

"whofun" <whofan...@live.com> wrote in message

> Unemployment hit 10.2 percent in October, the highest rate since April
> 1983 and much higher than analysts expected.

> Obama promised no more than 8%. Has he failed already?