In article <35f71633.150978...@newshost.cyberramp.net>,
gary...@cyberramp.net (GaryE) wrote: > Drydrunk (No Tom, I don't post under any other > names...you're looking paranoid) seems to bring out the 'real' in some > people.
Humor...Gary
I said if you were I was entirely fooled...my posts and thoughts seem to meander amongst the threads..even then the dots don't always connect.
As to bringing out the real....it's always seen as the real 'you' (not just you, Gary) when the negative or hostile surfaces. Like this wipes out the positive and compassionate side....isn't this merely looking thru the window and seeing the whole of each individual?
What is interesting to me isn't this so called 'real' as much as the degree and difference between this side of an individual and the other side.
Think I'm gonna have to call you on this one Gary.
What "REAL AA spiritual life looks like" to me is the fact that it is Labor Day in the United States, and just Monday in most of the rest of the world.
I'd venture to say that there is at least one or two AA members in every major town in America who are taking the time out of a Holiday to sit in an Intergroup office and answer the phone rather than be at home with family or out celebrating with friends. I imagine they each have a list of at least one person who is willing to take and go on a "Twelve Step Call" if needed.
I'd say there are a couple of people in every major town in America who is going to put everything down at a particular time today to go out get in their car, on their bike, or walk to an AA meeting place, open the doors, make the coffee, do the things necessary to insure that there will be a meeting should someone feel a need to reach out for the hand of AA.
I'd say that most all over the world, since today is Monday, and the start of the work week, that there was a hell of a lot of people who had just come to the end of their rope over the weekend and had arrived at a point in life where they decided they either had to change or die and sought out some kind of help or consolation from some representative of AA who was willing to take time out of a busy Monday schedule and share some "Experience, Strength and Hope" that may just possibly have some bearing on the future of the person who may have reached out.
I'd say AA spirituality is something like I feel sometimes when I go out to the old "VA Mental Hospital" here in Waco and see the little granite plaque under a tree out there in memory of a little dried up quiet, soft spoken man named Homer, who gave a major portion of his life, way above and beyond what the VA paid him to help and provide a little inspiration to countless VA bums like myself who had lost all hope of ever getting it all back together again.
I'd say AA spirituality is like a friend of mine over in Groesbeck who as long as I've known him, several nights a week takes his own car and goes out around town and picks up several fledgling drunks and hauls them to meetings sometimes as far as eighty miles round trip.
I'd say AA spirituality is like a lot of people who have come and gone on this NG who came to the conclusion that they could better serve or change AA by being where the action is. By being a part of AA, serving on committees, doing the foot work that needs to be done.
I'd say AA spirituality is like your friend Luke.
I'd say AA spirituality is countless people who came to AA and decided that even though it's not perfect, and is made up of human beings, and although they had feelings hurt on occasion. Even though they were on occasion told things that didn't wash. Even though they may have gone out and got drunk after their first time kept coming back, because they had enough sense to realize that the sum total of the positives outweighed the negatives and the little slights to their thin skinned raw nerves were no more than they found out in the world that were perpetuated by people who had no contact with nor knew shit about AA.
AA spirituality is the Fellowship. The human contact. The relief from the feeling of being so fucking alone. AA spirituality is a place to go in a world where it is damned hard to find a place for social interaction unless it's in a place where liquor is served, drugs being used, or a cover charge levied at the door.
AA spirituality is feeling in a safe place and not be hassled by predators that populate our public gathering places for an old person like me who can no longer handle the confrontation generated by refusal or inability to meet the needs of some shit head who thinks, I ought to give up the last bit of change in my pocket to support some habit.
AA spirituality is "Progress, not perfection" and hopefully trying to bring the drunk up to the level of AA and society, not taking AA and Society down to the level of the drunk or drug user.
AA spirituality is what you might see and feel if you went to a meeting someplace with an open mind and a willingness to accept the "individual differences" in the human race.
AA spirituality is a hell of a lot more than the screen names and personas you see scrolling across your CRT and a few posters here who would probably run like hell or move to a different town if they felt they might be visited by another posting member of the NG and who guard their anonymity for reasons a hell of a long distance removed from the traditions.
Charlie
GaryE <gary...@cyberramp.net> wrote in article <35f71633.150978...@newshost.cyberramp.net>...
Well, you never can tell Gary. Have to think about the movie, "The Shoes of the Fisherman" Where the Vatican had to reach to the remote corners of the Gulag Archipelago in the wilds of Siberia, to bring in one of their neglected, abandoned children, who was the least likely person in the world to fill the shoes.
Maybe AA ain't through with you yet. ;-)
As far as the post to Tom about wondering where "Charlie of Chronocidal Fame" was, he's been here all along. Conservation of energy Gary. Important to me. ;-) Some people just ain't worth fucking with. As far as the calling, I think back to a virtual handshake between you and I and expectations we might have of each other. Seen the other day where you'd been off to Colorado for a spell. Hope all went well, and maybe we'll be able to get that cup of coffee together one of these days either up there or down here.
Did you see where PETA is launching a massive campaign against Fishing. They say it doesn't take much skill or thought and is cruel to the fish. ;-)
Thanks for a thought provoking post Gary. Needed it.
Charlie
GaryE <gary...@cyberramp.net> wrote in article <35f54e5a.165355...@newshost.cyberramp.net>...
<chronoc...@mymail.net> wrote: >Think I'm gonna have to call you on this one Gary.
>What "REAL AA spiritual life looks like" to me is the fact that it is Labor >Day in the United States, and just Monday in most of the rest of the world.
<snipped>
I love it Charlie and Thanks :-)
-- Proud Member of The Lumber Cartel (TINLC) Unit# 1445 Join The Great American Pink-Out!!! http://www.ybecker.net/pink/ Anti-Spam Directory of Information and Resources http://www.ao.net/waytosuccess/nospam.html ICQ# 8631212 Authorisation needed Notice: Spelling mistakes left in for people who need to correct others to make their life fulfilled.
On Mon, 07 Sep 1998 21:12:12 GMT, gary...@cyberramp.net (GaryE) wrote: > I was hoping I would stick my neck out and see if >there were any *real* AA people out there who might not have dual >standards of judging.
Gary,
I'm sorely tempted at times to wade right in and blast someone whose apparent mission is primarily discordant, but each time I choose not to I'm grateful the next day.
When I look, (and yes I have to admit that I do), for those who do not have "dual standards of judging" I look inside my memory for the names of the regulars here who have *not* posted in threads such as you referred to. Their silence speaks to me clearly.
Maybe for many of those who don't, it's nothing more than hitting the delete key with the message unread. If so, it's still a conscious choice to live by certain principles, yes?
I will know a little more certainly, I think, that some growth has taken place when I less frequently even bother to look. Then I will know that my life is more full of what it should be and less involved with who out here ain't living up to the standards they preach, much less the ones I think they should be. <bwahahaaa> I have reason to believe that on that night when my head hits the pillow, I will sleep at peace.
All the best,
Michael B. 10/1/91 Chapel Hill real email: bagl...@earthlink.net
Gary, Since you clipped my posts out of context, I didn't think you'd mind if I responded by doing some clipping of my own.
GaryE wrote: > Clipping from some of high road AAers. > ______________________________________________
You may consider me a "high-road AAer", that's not the impression though that I was trying to give.
((CW: I've spent some time around the program, mainly as a "fringe-dweller". I would probably go as far as to say that the only reason that I'm a member, is because I say I am. There are a quite a number of things that I don't like or respect about anonymous programs and I would have absolutely no problem with "bailing" out.))
> DRYDRUNK, YOU'RE OBSESSED!
DryDrunk has posted 64x on this ng alone, since Wednesday of last week. That's like 13 post a day "habit", all on his favorite topic, "What I Really Hate about AA/NA." This seemed obsessive to me, sure. Judgmentally speaking that is.
((CW: Besides, the amount of time and energy you seem to spend "fighting the power", indicates to me, either religious fervor or that you're getting paid....well!))
((CW: What's come across clearly in your postings about Rational Recovery though is this:))
> YOU DON'T HAVE A FUCKING THING THAT I WANT!
Just my opinion. I assumed that DD was recruiting for RR, so what I was actually criticizing was his salesmanship, you know, honey vs. vinegar.
((CW: You might want to reexamine RR's decision to reject the steppers' "attraction rather than promotion" policy.))
> There's something to be said about being attractive..... rather than > repulsive!
(( CW: Why must you insist on making enemies, instead of friends or allies? How exactly is this furthering your cause?))
I forget that something said "in writing", comes across a little more harshly than it does verbally. Contrary to the tone of my previous post though, I do enjoy DD's sarcasm and irreverence. My intention was not to discourage, but rather to engage. DD's use of this particular ng to "fan the flames" of discontent, was what I was taking issue with. I was giving DD the benefit of the doubt by avoiding arbitrary assumptions that his posts were purely malicious or vindictive. What I was hoping for was a more focused, objective dialogue, involving "the real enemy", drug and alcohol abuse. Bitching is just bitching, it's unproductive. What also failed to occur to me, was that there just might be some history on this ng, involving DD and others, that I'm not aware of.
In article <35f71633.150978...@newshost.cyberramp.net>, gary...@cyberramp.net (GaryE) wrote:
The newcomer can read this and be
>certain that all that stuff about spirituality and love and tolerance >and a fit spiritual condition and resentment and anger are just >bullshit. At least if you use these responses are any indication of >how the program works. It's not like you can't kill file DryDrunk, is >it? So this must be a matter of choosing the words. Water finds it >own level and so do people. Makes me pretty sure there isn't a God. >Oh Phil, check this out for hyperbole, ranting, condescension, >ridicule, (what else did you have on your list?)---does this meet with >your approval? Sorry the sample was so small. It could have been >much larger.
<<<snip rhetorical overkill>>>> I believe using derision, sarcasm, and ridicule were the words I used. And that has been your primary method of communication lately as I see it. Perhaps you've not been feeling well? At any rate, I agree completely with Chronocidal Charlie's following post, that is the reality and beauty of it for me. Even when it's not perfect. I too have suffered from "the paralysis of analysis" and can still fall into the spiral if not careful. It's service that keeps it real and alive. As has been mentioned countless times to newcomers, any relationship of this newsgroup to real live AA is purely coincidental. Finding the worst in ourselves does not correlate with no God in ourselves. It only validates free will. I hope things go well for you. pphil
CW wrote: >Contrary to the tone of my previous post though, I do enjoy DD's sarcasm and irreverence. My intention was not to discourage, but rather to engage. DD's use of this particular ng to "fan the flames" of discontent, was what I was taking issue with. I was giving DD the benefit of the doubt by avoiding arbitrary assumptions that his > posts were purely malicious or vindictive. What I was hoping for was a > more focused, objective dialogue, involving "the real enemy", drug and > alcohol abuse...
_______________________________________________________________________ with all due...if you don't mind the inv. CW you remind me of a girl I used to know in elemetary school...she would get everyone turned against the other by 'fanning the fires' he said-she said 'fan-fan' blah-blah-blah. She would then stand back and enjoy the damage people did to one another, often she would come out smelling like a rose, but really her behaviour was just as distasteful as the mud slingers,if not more so- she lacked the courage to stand behind her own convictions and attitudes.
I find it kinda wimpy myself...I get shot at, but I'm willing to take a stand. all the best foxfire
Iam wrote: > CW wrote: > >Contrary to the tone of my previous post though, I do enjoy DD's sarcasm and irreverence. My intention was not to discourage, but rather to engage. DD's use of this particular ng to "fan the flames" of discontent, was what I was taking issue with. I was giving DD the benefit of the doubt by avoiding arbitrary assumptions that his > > posts were purely malicious or vindictive. What I was hoping for was a > more focused, objective dialogue, involving "the real enemy", drug and > alcohol abuse... > _______________________________________________________________________ > with all due...if you don't mind the inv. > CW you remind me of a girl I used to know in elemetary school...she > would get everyone turned against the other by 'fanning the fires' hesaid-she said 'fan-fan' blah-blah-blah. > She would then stand back and enjoy the damage people did to one > another, often she would come out smelling like a rose, but really her > behaviour was just as distasteful as the mud slingers,if not more so- > she lacked the courage to stand behind her own convictions and > attitudes. > I find it kinda wimpy myself...I get shot at, but I'm willing to take a > stand.all the best > foxfire
Expressing myself solely through writing is a new undertaking for me, so excuse me while I try to find my "voice". (It's much more difficult than it looks in the brochures)
You caught me and I'm so ashamed. Never again will I gleefully enjoy "stirrin' things up". Thank you for stopping me before I struck again. Empathy (standing in another's shoes), diplomacy (constructive interaction) and compromise (mutual agreement/concessions), were merely lofty notions which I was attempting to hide behind. What I was doing was using them justify my backpedal and my cowardice. This was something that I had hoped would go unnoticed.
There is an Irish proverb that goes: "It is better to be a coward for a minute, than dead the rest of your life." Which brings up a question, are you "real world" or "pretend world" brave, Foxfire? You are aware there is a difference, right? We both know that posting to a newsgroup doesn't really determine bravery or cowardice now, does it? There is no danger here. On the contrary, it seems pretty safe to me. Besides, victory over a coward, would just mean that you're a bully right?
But seriously, let me illustrate what I meant by "fighting the real enemy": In the US, we have "public service announcements" on television. One campaign involves home videos of adorable "little-ones", full of giggles, wonder and promise. Then across the screen flashes the date that a drunk driver killed these kids. No actors, no script, no preaching, yet very powerful!. They found their target audience in me. Gets me every - single - time! When I talk about focusing on the real enemy, this is to what I am referring. This is an issue which I can be "very" passionate about. Discussions? Why do we need any stinkin' discussions?
Some things are worth taking a hit for, some things are not. Agreed?
Hope this cleaned up any "cloudy water" which I may be responsible for.
In article <35f62e6b.41189...@newshost.cyberramp.net>, gary...@cyberramp.net (GaryE) wrote:
>>>><<<snip rhetorical overkill>>>> >>>>I believe using derision, sarcasm, and ridicule were the words I used. And >>>>that has been your primary method of communication lately as I see it. >>>>Perhaps you've not been feeling well?
>YOu really can't get it above the personal level, can you? If someone >does or says something you don't like, you make it personal. >Something must be wrong with the other person. Have you been trained >to think that way or is that your natural thought process. My mind >says that personal level remarks in response to a topic or an issue >is, how do I say this, let me put it in AA words, a dry drunk. >Everything was personal when I was drinking, was it for you? I was >sure that any remotely related topic was talking about me personally >and I was never one to keep it silent. Sort of like you are doing >here.
So you reserve the right to issue veiled insults and sideways character slurs but when reminded of your lack of manners it's " Oh, how could you be so dense as to think I meant it personally ?"" Why any fool can see I was only speaking metaphorically or taking a contrary view in the name of honest discourse." As the onlookers nod their heads wisely and agree that it would be most foolish to doubt this most reasonable "explaination". Then they are praised for their
>>>>At any rate, I agree completely with Chronocidal Charlie's following post, >>>>that is the reality and beauty of it for me. Even when it's not perfect. >>>>I too have suffered from "the paralysis of analysis" and can still fall into
>>>>the spiral if not careful.
>Ah, the second personal punch, the 'paralysis of analysis' line. You >do learn your stuff, don't you. Becky, help me here, would you say >this guy is projecting. Or maybe I am paralyzed.
>It's service that keeps it real and alive. >>>> As has been mentioned countless times to newcomers, any relationship of > this >>>>newsgroup to real live AA is purely coincidental. >>>>Finding the worst in ourselves does not correlate with no God in ourselves. > It >>>>only validates free will. >>>>I hope things go well for you.
>Phil, I have no way of knowing whether you are sincere with your wish >or not. People do those things so unthinkly and automatically that I >think it is mostly habit or rehearsed or a chickenshit way of ending a >personal slam. Things are going very well for me, by the way.
>BTW, I do get a heavy hand once in a while. I know it. I mean it >most of the time. Sometimes I don't. What I found curious is people >who like to put their own spin on what I write and then criticize the >spin they put on it. It's OK. I'm sort of used to being the 'bad >guy' . Good always has to have an enemy, you see.
>>>><<<snip rhetorical overkill>>>> >>>>I believe using derision, sarcasm, and ridicule were the words I used. And >>>>that has been your primary method of communication lately as I see it. >>>>Perhaps you've not been feeling well?
>YOu really can't get it above the personal level, can you? If someone >does or says something you don't like, you make it personal. >Something must be wrong with the other person. Have you been trained >to think that way or is that your natural thought process. My mind >says that personal level remarks in response to a topic or an issue >is, how do I say this, let me put it in AA words, a dry drunk. >Everything was personal when I was drinking, was it for you? I was >sure that any remotely related topic was talking about me personally >and I was never one to keep it silent. Sort of like you are doing >here.
for their depth of understanding. I know the method, It's mostly used by lawyers and politicians. Nothing personal.
>>>>At any rate, I agree completely with Chronocidal Charlie's following post, >>>>that is the reality and beauty of it for me. Even when it's not perfect. >>>>I too have suffered from "the paralysis of analysis" and can still fall into >>>>the spiral if not careful. >Ah, the second personal punch, the 'paralysis of analysis' line. You >do learn your stuff, don't you. Becky, help me here, would you say >this guy is projecting. Or maybe I am paralyzed.
While leaving out the combat allusion as I have no wish to punch anyone, I certainly have learned over the years of the dangers of isolation and alienation brought on by excessive self analysis. I am aware that you have friends on the newsgroup. I have been reading your exploratory posts for a year ; I do not project. In the last month or so, your mood and tone have changed dramatically. In my opinion.
>It's service that keeps it real and alive. >>>> As has been mentioned countless times to newcomers, any relationship of > this >>>>newsgroup to real live AA is purely coincidental. >>>>Finding the worst in ourselves does not correlate with no God in ourselves. > It >>>>only validates free will. >>>>I hope things go well for you.
>Phil, I have no way of knowing whether you are sincere with your wish >or not. People do those things so unthinkly and automatically that I >think it is mostly habit or rehearsed or a chickenshit way of ending a >personal slam. Things are going very well for me, by the way.
BTW, I do get a heavy hand once in a while. I know it. I mean it
>most of the time. Sometimes I don't. What I found curious is people >who like to put their own spin on what I write and then criticize the >spin they put on it. It's OK. I'm sort of used to being the 'bad >guy' . Good always has to have an enemy, you see.
>Regards, >GaryE
Yes, I am being sincere. I do not wish people well of whom I wish ill. I have no automatic nice that I know of. I try to be as honest as I can with little or no innuendo or subterfuge in what I say. Sarcasm occasionally when it slips out. Except perhaps on a religious level, It doesn't occur to me immediately why good has to have an enemy. But it don't bother me none. pphil
>>>>><<<snip rhetorical overkill>>>> >>>>>I believe using derision, sarcasm, and ridicule were the words I used. And >>>>>that has been your primary method of communication lately as I see it. >>>>>Perhaps you've not been feeling well?
>>YOu really can't get it above the personal level, can you? If someone >>does or says something you don't like, you make it personal. >>Something must be wrong with the other person. Have you been trained >>to think that way or is that your natural thought process. My mind >>says that personal level remarks in response to a topic or an issue >>is, how do I say this, let me put it in AA words, a dry drunk. >>Everything was personal when I was drinking, was it for you? I was >>sure that any remotely related topic was talking about me personally >>and I was never one to keep it silent. Sort of like you are doing >>here.
>So you reserve the right to issue veiled insults and sideways character slurs >but when reminded of your lack of manners it's " Oh, how could you be so dense >as to think I meant it personally ?"" Why any fool can see I was only speaking >metaphorically or taking a contrary view in the name of honest discourse." >As the onlookers nod their heads wisely and agree that it would be most >foolish to doubt this most reasonable "explaination". Then they are praised >for their
<<<<<<<<post remainder to follow----operator error>>>>>>>>> pphil
> Expressing myself solely through writing is a new undertaking for me, so excuse me while I try to find my "voice". (It's much more difficult than it looks in the brochures)
> You caught me and I'm so ashamed. Never again will I gleefully enjoy "stirrin' things up". Thank you for stopping me before I struck again. Empathy (standing in another's shoes), diplomacy (constructive interaction) and compromise (mutual agreement/concessions), were merely lofty notions which I was attempting to hide behind. What I > was doing was using them justify my backpedal and my cowardice. This was something that I had hoped would go unnoticed.
> There is an Irish proverb that goes: "It is better to be a coward for a minute, than dead the rest of your life." Which brings up a question, are you "real world" or "pretend world" brave, Foxfire? You are aware there is a difference, right? We both know that posting to a newsgroup doesn't really determine bravery or cowardice now, > does it? There is no danger here. On the contrary, it seems pretty safe to me. Besides, victory over a coward, would just mean that you're a bully right?
> But seriously, let me illustrate what I meant by "fighting the real enemy": In the US, we have "public service announcements" on television. One campaign involves home videos of adorable "little-ones", full of giggles, wonder and promise. Then across the screen flashes the date that a drunk driver killed these kids. No actors, no > script, no preaching, yet very powerful!. They found their target audience in me. Gets me every - single - time! When I talk about focusing on the real enemy, this is to what I am referring. This is an issue which I can be "very" passionate about. Discussions? Why do we need any stinkin' discussions?
> Some things are worth taking a hit for, some things are not. Agreed?
> Hope this cleaned up any "cloudy water" which I may be responsible for.
Iam wrote: > A bit wordy CW, but clear concise and non cryptic. I think I love you. > I get your point. Thank you.
> All the best > foxfire
Mon Cheri, You aren't the first one to tell me that my writing's wordy! (If you hear it more than once..) Don't think I've ever been called, blunt, anal, and sarcastic in such a nice way! Your comments are just too kind. Better watch the endearments. Rumor has it that the "morality police" have infiltrated this ng. ;)