> - Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -> On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:40:38 -0700 (PDT), Usenet Legends bobandcarole

> > ?®? <usenetlegends0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >x-no-archive:
> > >On Sep 2, 10:34 am, 4s00th <4s0...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:03:34 -0700 (PDT), Doc Dice

> > >> <stevenjohnson...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> > >> >Mad as a Box of Frogs wrote:
> > >> >> In article <a96cc17e-f810-42ed-88c4-d70ce406d...@o35g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>,
> > >> >> Usenet Legends bobandcarole ? ?? ?? ?  <usenetlegends0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> >x-no-archive:
> > >> >> >On Sep 1, 2:55?am, under...@news.vrx.net (Mad as a Box of Frogs)
> > >> >> >wrote:
> > >> >> >> In article <6593477c-9119-414c-927d-45f5b3c26...@g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
> > >> >> >> Doc Dice ?<steven_johnson...@rocketmail.com> wrote:

> > >> >> >> >Somebody should beat the shit out of this pedo fuck Hylton!!

> > >> >> >> >DD

> > >> >> >> Someone should forward STEVEN JOHNSON'S threats to the rocketmail
> > >> >> >> admins and law enforcement.

> > >> >> >What's stoppin ya, rastus?
> > >> >> >Start tap-dancing!!

> > >> >> >I am obviously psychotic.

> > >> >> And you forgot to mention - over 50,

> > >> >cites?

> > >> The bo0b claims to have served in Vietnam -- you do the math.

> > >> >> fat,

> > >> >cites?

> > >> Like anyone cares.

> > >> > > alone

> > >> >cites?

> > >> Circumstantial, maybe -- but who else would have that much time to
> > >> troll Usenet? I lost track over 2 years ago when I was able to confirm
> > >> no less than 14,000 posts over the course of about 2 years -- and that
> > >> didn't even include the accounts that had been banned due to TOS
> > >> violations.

> > >> >> and of no use to anyone

> > >> >cites?

> > >> I won't say he's totally useless, but I'll be damned if I can think of
> > >> anything worthwhile that I've seen him do on Usenet! Sure, he's made
> > >> rude remarks and called people names ... but other than that ....

> > >> >> indicated by Carole running off with a real man

> > >> >cites?

> > >> A whining insult, admitted. I feel bad for Carole. Not only is she
> > >> stuck with a husband who is an equal-opportunity hater, but she's a
> > >> Usenet widow!

> > >> No, seriously -- I don't know anything about Carole. But I can hope
> > >> that she has more of a calming influence on the bo0b IRL.

> > >> >Mad as a box of Rubbers whines and screeds perfectly but
> > >> >can't provide ONE piece of relevant evidence to prove his
> > >> >delusions.

> > >> >Evidence:

> > >> >1.  A thing or things helpful in forming a conclusion or judgment: The
> > >> >broken window was evidence that a burglary had taken place. Scientists
> > >> >weigh the evidence for and against a hypothesis.

> > >> >tr.v. ev·i·denced, ev·i·denc·ing, ev·i·denc·es
> > >> >2. To indicate clearly; exemplify or prove.
> > >> >3. To support by testimony; attest.

> > >> >Frog fucker can't provide it because he's a liar.

> > >> >DD

> > >> You mean the same way that the bo0b can't provide any evidence of the
> > >> many accusations he's made against me,

> > >I've ALWAYS said you and the other filth who lurks in this toilet
> > >believe that
> > >child molestation isn't harmful and you proved me 100% right:

> > >"Lawrence Taylor, despite being a "paedosexual," that's his word for
> > >it
> > >and I think it may be accurate for those of us whose main preference
> > >is for children, is rather happily involved with a long-term adult
> > >partner and agrees with me that it's irresponsible for an adult to get
> > >involved in a sexual relationship with a minor. Neither of us believe
> > >that such a relationship is inherently harmful, but we both believe
> > >that there is way too much risk to even consider it"--Steven Hylton

> > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/bde753a4f28...

> > >Steven D "4s00th" Hylton ...

> > >Residing at:
> > >203 Hill And Dale Rd
> > >Martinsville, VA 24112-8483

> > >His pedo hotline:
> > >(276) 638-8551

> > >His picture:

> > >http://img141.yfrog.com/i/4s00th.jpg/

> > >"I am a pedophile -- someone who is sexually attracted to children;
> > >I won't quibble about pre-adolescent or post-adolescent because I
> > >like them all. That does not make me a threat to children"--Steven
> > >D. Hylton aka "4s00th" aka "Ispoilboys"

> > >   "Yes, I've thought about giving little boys blow jobs, and the
> > >  fantasies have been very thrilling and exciting to me"--Steven
> > >D. Hylton aka "4s00th" aka "Ispoilboys"

> > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/
> > >d768e45a1077ee84?&hl=en

> > >(Or see it here:
> > >http://tinyurl.com/lcj6o9
> > >.......................................................................... ­...................................................
> > >We can conclude that if the right situation presented itself, and he
> > >thought
> > >he wouldn't get caught, 4s00th WOULD offend because he doesn't think
> > >it's
> > >harmful to the innocent boys involved. At best he can't be trusted
> > >around small
> > >boys.

> > >> Lawrence Taylor, David Simpson,
> > >> XXX, Baal, TomBa and any number of others whom he has repeatedly
> > >> accused of child-molestation?

> > >You yourself stated that lecher laurence taylor doesn't think child
> > >molestation is
> > >harmful

> > >> You anti-type twats

> > >The truth comes out in all it's ugly glory. 4s00th would have you
> > >believe
> > >HE is anti-molestation.

> > >> can't be bothered to provide evidence of anything
> > >> you post,

> > >LOL!!!!!

> > >Why bother when you present the evidence for me ...

> > >> but you sure do scream for it when someone posts something
> > >> that you don't like.

> > >You mean when a sick son of a whore states he doesn't believe
> > >raping children isn't harmful? You're god damned right, mutant.

> > >> Maybe if you started providing citations and
> > >> evidence yourself, you wouldn't seem like such whining hypocrites.

> > >Again why bother when you do all the work for moi???   :-)

> > It's very clear that you cannot be trusted to post my statements in
> > the context that they were given. It's very clear that sexual
> > relationships between adults and children are not inherently harmful
> > -- or do you want to deny that such relationships were not only
> > common, but actually expected in Ancient Greece and Feudal Japan?

> "Ancient" iz tha keyword, shitbag. Now ya sound like Orion when he
> thought hiz
> screed about the Sambian tribal savages and how they regularly rape
> their boys
> makes it harmless and acceptable in 21'st century USA.

> > But
> > it is also very clear that, for some children, such relationships are
> > devastatingly harmful.

> That's what cha really believe eh?

> "Neither of us believe
> that such a relationship is inherently harmful"--Steven Hylton

> "Lawrence Taylor, despite being a "paedosexual," that's his word for
> it and I think it may be accurate for those of us whose main
> preference
> is for children, is rather happily involved with a long-term adult
> partner and agrees with me that it's irresponsible for an adult to get
> involved in a sexual relationship with a minor. Neither of us believe
> that such a relationship is inherently harmful, but we both believe
> that there is way too much risk to even consider it"--Steven Hyltonhttp://tinyurl.com/kmkxtw

> Mebbe ya should make up yer fuckkin mind?

> Either because the adult uses force, trickery

> > or other coercion, or because they make the child feel ashamed of what
> > happened when it was very clearly not the child's fault or because the
> > child feels betrayed by someone that they expected to protect them.

> The child feels ashamed because what he is doing is WRONG. Only
> perverts
> have sex with another male and sicko deviants have sex with children.

> > And, in fact, some children are made to feel guilty by the reaction
> > that society has if the relationship is outed. However, none of these
> > harms can occur if the adult does not have a sexual relationship with
> > the child. Therefore, the only possible decision a responsible and
> > loving adult can make in this current environment is to abstain.

> That and the threat of 20 years, huh?

>  without having to pay for it with their bodies!

> > You and your cronies have been consistently and deliberately
> > misrepresenting what I say because it just burns you up that I can
> > freely admit that I'm sexually attracted to children and choose not to
> > act on those feelings.

> Ya lost ALL credibility.

>  I don't understand why you think it's so

> > difficult for a man to control his behaviors so that he keeps all of
> > his relationships with others appropriate.

> > And I will tell you this time and time again: I am not afraid of the
> > law;

> REally?  Are ya afraid of what yer family thinks? Ya SHOULD be,
> my letter iz finished and ready to mail. I wish I could see the look
> on yer brothers face when he reads it. :-)

> > I choose not to harm children because I care about them

> Uh huh ...wE can tell:

> "Lawrence Taylor, despite being a "paedosexual," that's his word for
> it and I think it may be accurate for those of us whose main
> preference
> is for children, is rather happily involved with a long-term adult
> partner and agrees with me that it's irresponsible for an adult to get
> involved in a sexual relationship with a minor. Neither of us believe
> that such a relationship is inherently harmful, but we both believe
> that there is way too much risk to even consider it"--Steven Hylton