Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Question about SLR and zoom lenses
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
the Omrud  
View profile  
 More options Jul 6, 6:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.photography
From: the Omrud <usenet.om...@gEXPUNGEmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:00:53 GMT
Local: Mon, Jul 6 2009 6:00 am
Subject: Re: Question about SLR and zoom lenses

Mentalguy2k8 wrote:

> "the Omrud" <usenet.om...@gEXPUNGEmail.com> wrote in message
> news:s974m.52038$OO7.34571@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
>>> Hi,

>>> I'm looking to buy a mid-range SLR digital camera, are there any
>>> pitfalls I should be aware of?

>> Many, I'm afraid.  It's not easy to know where to start.

>>> Also, I'm looking at zoom lenses to go with it, how do I work out
>>> what magnification they are, eg 5x, 10x etc? For instance, this lens:
>>> http://shop.panasonic.co.uk/invt/hfs045200e

>>> says "90 to 400 mm (35 mm equivalent)" and "Maximum magnification:
>>> Approx. 0.19x / 0.38x (35mm film camera equivalent)".

>> SLR users don't tend to talk about 5x, etc, especially those of us who
>> have been taking photos since the 1950s.  What's interesting are the
>> two numbers of the zoom, e.g. 35 to 135, 90 to 400, etc.

>> 50/55mm  is 1:1 real-life size.  So your lens above is a zoom, from
>> medium long to very long, a little more than 4x zoom range.  To
>> confuse matters, many mid-range digital SLR cameras have sensors
>> smaller than an original 35mm film frame, so the magnification of any
>> lens is different from when you use it on a "full frame sensor"
>> camera.  If you need to know why, you should read up on focal length,
>> e.g.:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_length.

>> Why did you choose this lens?  Would you never want to use a
>> wide-angle lens, as if you only have one like this, you wouldn't be
>> able to.

> It was really just an example, as one of the cameras I was looking at
> came as a package with this lens as a 2nd lens here:

> http://www.pixmania.co.uk/uk/uk/2895441/art/panasonic/lumix-dmc-g1-in...

> the standard lens also supplied is 14-45mm

That's surprising for a "standard" lens - 14mm is very wide angle and
the whole zoom range is wide angle, compared with the standard 50mm,
although it would be different on a small sensor SLR.

>>> Can anyone tell me what this equates to? I'd preferably prefer to buy
>>> a camera package with a separate zoom lens, any recommendations for
>>> decent UK-based sites or shops? I'm currently looking at the Pixmania
>>> site.

>> Pixmania will deliver at a good price, but I have heard that they are
>> not as friendly as some if anything happens to go wrong.  I tend to
>> use Amazon if they have what I want.  Here's your lens:

> Thanks for the advice, I'm just browsing at the moment, I usually do a
> Google on a particular model to see if I can get it cheaper elsewhere.
> I've decided to take photography more seriously as a hobby, I already
> have a digi camera with a 10x zoom, I'd be using a new one for scenery,
> wildlife etc., so I was interested to see how the SLR zoom factors
> compared to what I already have. If I wanted, say, better than 10x zoom,
> is there a rough way to find out which lens would offer this?

Large range zoom SLR lenses are large and heavy.  Few amateurs will have
a lens with a 10x zoom range - I'm not sure I've ever held one.

Here's one:
http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/EF_Lenses/Zoom...
http://tinyurl.com/ouofcl

The bigger and more complex the lens, the more compromises have to be
made, so the cost goes up dramatically for a good lens as the
compromises have to be ironed out with more expensive engineering.  The
one above costs about £2000.  It would not be sensible to put it on a
cheap SLR.

But the whole point of an SLR is that you can change the lens.  So you
can buy two or three decent lenses and change them around.  I have a
cheap 55 - 80 which came with the camera (it's not very good, but it has
the benefit of being light weight), a very good 35 - 135 which I bought
15 or more years ago for my first Canon EOS film SLR, and a 100 - 300
which I bought from a friend and which isn't much cop, to be honest.

> One last question, can I use a remote shutter release with all SLR's or
> is it model-specific?

My Canon has an optional remote shutter release (infra-red, like a tiny
TV remote) which I believe will work with any Canon SLR - I think it
cost me £10.  It seems likely that other major SRL makes will have a
similar option, but any decent camera shop will tell you.

--
David


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google