> I did this panoramic photography:

> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4053419866/

> According your experiences, what guides should be keep in mind for this
> kind of photos?

> Thanks for your comments.

> I did this panoramic photography:

> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4053419866/

> According your experiences, what guides should be keep in mind for this kind
> of photos?

> Thanks for your comments.

>> I did this panoramic photography:

>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4053419866/

>> According your experiences, what guides should be keep in mind for this
>> kind of photos?

>> Thanks for your comments.

> I assume this is a composite pano (several images).

> The most important is panning level.  So a tripod that is properly leveled
> and a head holding the camera on that level or in a cone perpendicular to
> that level is a technical requirement (esp. for very large panos with many
> images.

> A head that swivels under the lenses nodal point (wrong term perhaps but
> that point typically inside the lens where light rays cross) will minimize
> distortions in the image.

> Consistent lighting over the exposed area coupled to a manually set
> exposure.  For this moderate (4/10 or so) cloud cover helps if the pano is
> more than 90 degrees or so by distributing the light more evenly in the
> scene.  Esp. low altitude cumulus.  (puffy clouds).

> If there is a lot of movement in the scene, it is best that they be small
> relative to the scene or people will notice chopped bodies or multiples of
> the same body (cars, motorcycles, cows, birds).

> And more important: something interesting to shoot a pano of...

>>> I did this panoramic photography:

>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4053419866/

>>> According your experiences, what guides should be keep in mind for
>>> this kind of photos?

>>> Thanks for your comments.

>> I assume this is a composite pano (several images).

>> The most important is panning level.  So a tripod that is properly
>> leveled and a head holding the camera on that level or in a cone
>> perpendicular to that level is a technical requirement (esp. for very
>> large panos with many images.

>> A head that swivels under the lenses nodal point (wrong term perhaps
>> but that point typically inside the lens where light rays cross) will
>> minimize distortions in the image.

>> Consistent lighting over the exposed area coupled to a manually set
>> exposure.  For this moderate (4/10 or so) cloud cover helps if the pano
>> is more than 90 degrees or so by distributing the light more evenly in
>> the scene.  Esp. low altitude cumulus.  (puffy clouds).

>> If there is a lot of movement in the scene, it is best that they be
>> small relative to the scene or people will notice chopped bodies or
>> multiples of the same body (cars, motorcycles, cows, birds).

>> And more important: something interesting to shoot a pano of...

> Ray and Alan, thanks for your comments and recommendations, I will be
> practicing for improvement in this kind of photography.

>> "Alan Browne" <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca> escribió en el mensaje
>> news:SKGdnV9CrJ1q8HHXnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>> mmyvusenet wrote:
>>>> Hello:

>>>> I did this panoramic photography:

>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4053419866/

>>>> According your experiences, what guides should be keep in mind for
>>>> this kind of photos?

>>>> Thanks for your comments.

>>> I assume this is a composite pano (several images).

>>> The most important is panning level.  So a tripod that is properly
>>> leveled and a head holding the camera on that level or in a cone
>>> perpendicular to that level is a technical requirement (esp. for very
>>> large panos with many images.

>>> A head that swivels under the lenses nodal point (wrong term perhaps
>>> but that point typically inside the lens where light rays cross) will
>>> minimize distortions in the image.

>>> Consistent lighting over the exposed area coupled to a manually set
>>> exposure.  For this moderate (4/10 or so) cloud cover helps if the pano
>>> is more than 90 degrees or so by distributing the light more evenly in
>>> the scene.  Esp. low altitude cumulus.  (puffy clouds).

>>> If there is a lot of movement in the scene, it is best that they be
>>> small relative to the scene or people will notice chopped bodies or
>>> multiples of the same body (cars, motorcycles, cows, birds).

>>> And more important: something interesting to shoot a pano of...

>> Ray and Alan, thanks for your comments and recommendations, I will be
>> practicing for improvement in this kind of photography.

> Cool. I have done some dabbling in panoramas - got a few that worked out
> quite well. If you're interested, I have one on my home page -
> www.rcarter.net - it's the Teton's under some rather challenging light
> conditions - it's far from perfect, but was fun to do. On my photo page,
> down near the bottom is the first one I ever did - took the photos with
> my old Kodak DC210+ (1mp camera). That was a learning experience.