Web Images Videos Maps News Groups Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Happy 4th! (The 200mm f/2G Goes to Annapolis)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Matt Clara  
View profile  
 More options Jul 6, 9:37 pm
Newsgroups: alt.photography, rec.photo.digital.slr-systems, rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: "Matt Clara" <n...@myexpense.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:37:08 -0400
Local: Mon, Jul 6 2009 9:37 pm
Subject: Re: Happy 4th! (The 200mm f/2G Goes to Annapolis)
"Larry Thong" <larry_th...@shitstring.com> wrote in message

news:EfGdneJU8Iu_Bs3XnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@supernews.com...

> Yep, it was a nice day yesterday to celebrate the 4th of July.  What
> better way than to knock some dust off the old 200/2 and mate er up with
> the old D3?  The 200/2 definitely is a great lightweight walk around lens.

Wow.  Amazingly insipid.  It's surprising you'd choose to share that, here
or anywhere.

--
www.mattclara.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bruce  
View profile  
 More options Jul 6, 10:11 pm
Newsgroups: alt.photography, rec.photo.digital.slr-systems, rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: Bruce <n...@nospam.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:11:59 +0100
Local: Mon, Jul 6 2009 10:11 pm
Subject: Re: Happy 4th! (The 200mm f/2G Goes to Annapolis)

"Matt Clara" <n...@myexpense.com> wrote:
>"Larry Thong" <larry_th...@shitstring.com> wrote in message
>news:EfGdneJU8Iu_Bs3XnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@supernews.com...
>> Yep, it was a nice day yesterday to celebrate the 4th of July.  What
>> better way than to knock some dust off the old 200/2 and mate er up with
>> the old D3?  The 200/2 definitely is a great lightweight walk around lens.

>Wow.  Amazingly insipid.  It's surprising you'd choose to share that, here
>or anywhere.

Of course the *real* "great lightweight walk around lens" of choice for
Nikon is the 180mm f/2.8 (79mm dia. x 144mm long, weighing only 760g)
not the 200mm f/2 (124mm dia. x 203mm long, weighing a colossal 2900g).

2900g is over 100 ounces, making the 200mm f/2 about as far from "a
lightweight walk around lens" as could be.  Monopods at the ready!

Apart from a weight that's almost three quarters less than the 200mm
f/2, the 180mm f/2.8 is also optically an outstanding performer, making
it an all-time favourite with Nikon users.

(above weights and dimensions from Nikon Europe's web site)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robert Coe  
View profile  
 More options Jul 7, 6:48 am
Newsgroups: alt.photography, rec.photo.digital.slr-systems, rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: Robert Coe <b...@1776.COM>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:48:14 -0400
Local: Tues, Jul 7 2009 6:48 am
Subject: Re: Happy 4th! (The 200mm f/2G Goes to Annapolis)
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:37:08 -0400, "Matt Clara" <n...@myexpense.com> wrote:

: "Larry Thong" <larry_th...@shitstring.com> wrote in message
: news:EfGdneJU8Iu_Bs3XnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@supernews.com...
: > Yep, it was a nice day yesterday to celebrate the 4th of July.  What
: > better way than to knock some dust off the old 200/2 and mate er up with
: > the old D3?  The 200/2 definitely is a great lightweight walk around lens.
:
: Wow.  Amazingly insipid.  It's surprising you'd choose to share that, here
: or anywhere.

Obviously you didn't notice what's odd about the picture. That's a 48-star
American flag, which hasn't been current since 1959. It's very unusual to see
such a flag flying today. Since Rita took the picture at Annapolis, home of
the U.S. Naval Academy, it may have been part of some sort of war memorial.

If you're a Canadian, a Brit, or an Aussie, you get a pass. Otherwise, I have
to dock you two prestige points.

Bob


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Annika1980  
View profile  
 More options Jul 7, 7:33 am
Newsgroups: alt.photography, rec.photo.digital.slr-systems, rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: Annika1980 <annika1...@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 7 2009 7:33 am
Subject: Re: Happy 4th! (The 200mm f/2G Goes to Annapolis)
On Jul 6, 4:48 pm, Robert Coe <b...@1776.COM> wrote:

> Obviously you didn't notice what's odd about the picture. That's a 48-star
> American flag, which hasn't been current since 1959.

Maybe it was an archive shot?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jaf  
View profile  
 More options Jul 7, 9:59 am
Newsgroups: alt.photography, rec.photo.digital.slr-systems, rec.photo.equipment.35mm
From: "jaf" <johnf...@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:59:36 -0400
Local: Tues, Jul 7 2009 9:59 am
Subject: Re: Happy 4th! (The 200mm f/2G Goes to Annapolis)

"Annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote in message news:b55ef7e5-5c95-468b-883e-7e78567738e1@18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

On Jul 6, 4:48 pm, Robert Coe <b...@1776.COM> wrote:

> Obviously you didn't notice what's odd about the picture. That's a 48-star
> American flag, which hasn't been current since 1959.

Maybe it was an archive shot?

What do you want to bet that they did NOT make flags out of nylon in the 1950's?

John


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google