| |
alt.disability.issues |
One does implement accessibility for one or another disability. Accessibility is about given all users equal access, whether they are grumpy In accessibility one can not discriminate any one, no group are to small. Best regards
> I'm sorry. I don't market Macromedia Flash despite the way it might
> have come out -- Toronto has been fairly successful in using it to
> give people with intellectual disabilities a chance to build a
> communication network for people with disabilities and their families
> - the link was posted with my previous post if you want to check it
> out.
frontpage or time to scroll down, I ended up on a new page. That is not
accessibility by any standards ;-(
> the visually impared (not that it's been done but I know the software
> and I know it's possible and not difficult to do). I'm not saying
> that it's easily adapted or that there is even alot of content out
> there now, but it is indeed possible if specific disabilities are
> considered during the web creation process -- that is my evidence.
old men, blind and deaf, have no hands......
One for all and all for one ;-)
> disabilities, but for sites focused on providing information to
> people with disabilities, it is certainly an option.
> link a second time in case you didn't notice it. Cheers!
simple as that. I consider it a bit out of line, rude are maybe a more
appropriate word here, to present a graphical based website in a group for
people with VI.
Johnny Winther Ronnenberg
--
Det er brugeren der bestemmer ;-)
http://www.ronnenberg.dk/webaccessibility/
Last: revision:
http://www.ronnenberg.dk/webaccessibility/upcomingwork.asp (danish
only) and
http://www.ronnenberg.dk/webaccessibility/lettheuserchoose.asp