web design for disabled users - alt.disability.issues

Message from discussion web design for disabled users
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!not-for-mail
From: "Johnny Winther Ronnenberg" <johnny.wint...@XYZtdcadsl.dk>
Newsgroups: alt.disability.issues,alt.comp.blind-users
References: <41pql7F1fket9U1@individual.net> <11v170fl1fp6f62@corp.supernews.com>
Subject: Re: web design for disabled users
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:04:59 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <43f110a3$0$147$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk>
Organization: TDC Totalloesninger
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.62.61.212
X-Trace: 1139871907 dread11.news.tele.dk 147 80.62.61.212:8232
X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk

Community Living Chatham-Kent wrote:

Besides the sales speach it would be nice with site references that proved 
the sales speak.

Flash has not, although great work have been done by Macromedia been 
especially accessibly until now.

So where the fuck are the evidence?

Best regards
Johnny Winther Ronnenberg


-- 
Det er brugeren der bestemmer ;-)
http://www.ronnenberg.dk/webaccessibility/
Last: revision: http://www.ronnenberg.dk/webaccessibility/whytables.asp
and http://80.62.61.212/webaccessibility/index.asp