Message from discussion
System Continuous Integration
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Received: by 10.150.189.9 with SMTP id m9mr809496ybf.8.1245998229569; Thu, 25
Jun 2009 23:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ea18f4a9-e1c2-453f-af94-c31cb473bad4@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 212.123.1.140
References: <25d8a86a-7977-4e34-9d1d-7ce2e4af5efd@p4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
<2ae9c5e6-c19f-40d2-baf9-89be7e8bf8b2@q37g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>
<ea18f4a9-e1c2-453f-af94-c31cb473bad4@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR
3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 proxy.iconos.be:8080 (squid/2.5.STABLE9)
Message-ID: <a5391d40-2e85-4933-ac12-46b8f26d40a8@f16g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: System Continuous Integration
From: Koen <verhulstk...@gmail.com>
To: ADF Enterprise Methodology Group <adf-methodology@googlegroups.com>
Are you able to compare TeamCity vs. Hudson? I don't have real
experience using TeamCity.
Is there a advantage to use TeamCity instead of Hudson?
Regards,
Koen
Drikus Britz schreef:
> We are using TeamCity. Also works quite nice.
|
