Message from discussion System Continuous Integration

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Received: by 10.100.248.16 with SMTP id v16mr410300anh.0.1245867867149; Wed, 
	24 Jun 2009 11:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <25d8a86a-7977-4e34-9d1d-7ce2e4af5efd@p4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 94.224.233.185
References: <25d8a86a-7977-4e34-9d1d-7ce2e4af5efd@p4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; 
	InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 
	3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <2ae9c5e6-c19f-40d2-baf9-89be7e8bf8b2@q37g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: System Continuous Integration
From: Koen <verhulstk...@gmail.com>
To: ADF Enterprise Methodology Group <adf-methodology@googlegroups.com>

Hi Alejandro,

on a current project, we are use Hudson as a Continuous Integration
system. Once those systems has been set up, you will benefit from it.

Alejandro schreef:
> Hi.
> Leaving aside the survey :)
>
> Oracle have a system Continuous Integration like Continuum,
> Hudson,etc.. for ADF applications?
>
> Or Which  recommend?
>
> Thanks in advance