<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>ADF Enterprise Methodology Group Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology</link>
  <description>The JDev ADF Enterprise Methodology Group is for discussing high level design issues for ADF projects, beyond how to get things to work or bugs via the OTN forums. This is a professional forum. Please join with accounts based on your name. Attempts to join with anonymous accounts will be refused.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Dynamic Tabs Shell template - useful to mere mortals?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/f84bdcec40b7819f/4f87af4e4120df5f?show_docid=4f87af4e4120df5f</link>
  <description>
  Yesterday I had a look into the new Dynamic Tabs Shell template, as &lt;br&gt; delivered in 11gR1 PS1. I wrote a blog posting about it here: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.veriton.co.uk/roller/fmw/entry/adf_dynamic_tabs_shell_template&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Now my question is, how useful will this template be to custom/bespoke &lt;br&gt; app developments of a much more modest size than Fusion Apps? I&#39;ve
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/f84bdcec40b7819f</guid>
  <author>
  sim...@veriton.co.uk
  (Simon Haslam)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:05:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>How about a document on Anti Patterns?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/ec5ea52229b92ca9/89c1c4c6ca8cbb56?show_docid=89c1c4c6ca8cbb56</link>
  <description>
  This recent discussion (&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/adf-methodology/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; browse_thread/thread/85789753d 19d1aeb) &lt;br&gt; prompted me to think of another document on common ADF anti-patterns/ &lt;br&gt; bad practices parallel to the Coding Standards document. &lt;br&gt; I have read some good tips on what *not* to do by Steve Muench and the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/ec5ea52229b92ca9</guid>
  <author>
  jvs...@gmail.com
  (Jang Vijay Singh)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:49:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>A new way for post-query (description field) without using the EO or get accessor pls give me your feedback.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/85789753d19d1aeb/ff18d67953156fa0?show_docid=ff18d67953156fa0</link>
  <description>
  Dear All, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Regarding the post-query,(using for getting the description field &lt;br&gt; which is in another table such as viewing the name of department when &lt;br&gt; there is only department_id in the VO of employee) as you now we have &lt;br&gt; 2 common ways to handle that first is to use two EO that there is an &lt;br&gt; association between them which one of them is updatable and the other
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/85789753d19d1aeb</guid>
  <author>
  amir.kha...@gmail.com
  (akhanof)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:04:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Standards around Model / UI project dependencies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/e97d925f26f26a0f/ef2042d86b99608c?show_docid=ef2042d86b99608c</link>
  <description>
  Hello Everyone, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;This is my first post to the group and I look forward to exchanging &lt;br&gt; ideas with all of you. I am very passionate about getting this &lt;br&gt; excellent technology widely adopted and in the right way. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I did search the group for existing posts on this topic but didn&#39;t &lt;br&gt; find any. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I think one point that merits an addition to the standards is for
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/e97d925f26f26a0f</guid>
  <author>
  jvs...@gmail.com
  (Jang Vijay Singh)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:13:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>DB API-based ADF Business Components</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/4e23f6257426fc08/1e5bf472f7248b27?show_docid=1e5bf472f7248b27</link>
  <description>
  Hi all, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Not 100% sure this is appropriate here--mods, please delete if it &lt;br&gt; isn&#39;t. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I wanted to announce an ADF project I just started on SampleCode: A &lt;br&gt; completely rewritten framework for DB API-based ADF Business &lt;br&gt; Components. The first public beta version (0.1b) is available for &lt;br&gt; download now, but I&#39;m especially interested in finding any community
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/4e23f6257426fc08</guid>
  <author>
  av...@avromroyfaderman.com
  (Avrom Roy-Faderman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:38:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Test - please ignore</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/bcf521f0a391809f/373d1b3b3bc937b9?show_docid=373d1b3b3bc937b9</link>
  <description>
  Test - please ignore
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/bcf521f0a391809f</guid>
  <author>
  chriscm...@gmail.com
  (Chris Muir)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:02:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Reuse - Base class for backing beans</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/9fadc29fad930480/43bf5988fbb5b95f?show_docid=43bf5988fbb5b95f</link>
  <description>
  I found that there were some methods that I was writing again and &lt;br&gt; again in backing beans. So I finally wrote my own backing bean base &lt;br&gt; class, and now all my backing beans subclass it. Anybody else doing &lt;br&gt; this? Good idea or bad? Another approach is to write utility classes &lt;br&gt; like Steve Muench;s EL class, and call the utility methods where
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/9fadc29fad930480</guid>
  <author>
  jcfl...@excite.com
  (John Flack)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:40:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Reuse - Do you have your own subclasses of ADF BC Impl classes?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/e38f0d46e77341ea/a650e978e022a28f?show_docid=a650e978e022a28f</link>
  <description>
  What the subject says - &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve heard Steve Muench and others state as a best practice that you &lt;br&gt; should always subclass ADF BC&#39;s implementation classes even if you &lt;br&gt; don&#39;t plan at first to write any of your own code in them. The idea &lt;br&gt; is that if you later decide to add some code you have a place to put
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/e38f0d46e77341ea</guid>
  <author>
  jcfl...@excite.com
  (John Flack)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:33:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>PL/SQL global context and global temporary table in ADF</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/eb04a3d8793dc63f/423442934680da7b?show_docid=423442934680da7b</link>
  <description>
  Hi All, &lt;br&gt; I have read many different topics around lots of PL/SQL and ADF. I &lt;br&gt; still want to start this new thread to address one of our biggest road &lt;br&gt; block of ADF project. Our current project has so many PL/SQL code and &lt;br&gt; many API calls involve PL/SQL global context setting where other PL/ &lt;br&gt; SQL APIs depend on last calls. Also there are some Global Temporary
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/eb04a3d8793dc63f</guid>
  <author>
  cdihe...@gmail.com
  (Chetan Dihenia)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:44:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>One Model Project and two viewProjects</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/8a095b9799bcbc3c/25ff11c867136cd0?show_docid=25ff11c867136cd0</link>
  <description>
  When we disign applications in jDev; we are quite driven to share model &lt;br&gt; projects directly into viewProjects; &lt;br&gt; The real fact is that model projects, are not to be directly shared by &lt;br&gt; diferrents viewProjects; at least in my tests here; &lt;br&gt; how to deal with it ? &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=963163&amp;tstart=0&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/8a095b9799bcbc3c</guid>
  <author>
  mar...@santoandrea.com.br
  (Marcos Ortega)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:04:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Ring the celebration bells - 1000 messages</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/63dd669fe0ce1760/b3a5e982e9fc0319?show_docid=b3a5e982e9fc0319</link>
  <description>
  The group just hit another milestone, 1000 posts in just over a year. &lt;br&gt; Well done everyone, and thanks for participating. Nice to see people &lt;br&gt; are willing to take time out to chat with peers on best practices and &lt;br&gt; more. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;For the record, top posters have been: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;196 Chris Muir (can&#39;t shut me up) &lt;br&gt; 70 Avrom Roy-Faderman
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/63dd669fe0ce1760</guid>
  <author>
  chriscm...@gmail.com
  (Chris Muir)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:30:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Thread hijacking - not to worry</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/d303c2ab8edd2e0c/cebc66b895d08eb5?show_docid=cebc66b895d08eb5</link>
  <description>
  As Avrom has noted threads are getting accidentally hijacked in the &lt;br&gt; Google Group. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;My understanding is this occurs because at some point somebody takes &lt;br&gt; one of the original emails, replies, changes the subject line and &lt;br&gt; sends it back in. Apparently Google Groups doesn&#39;t track threads by &lt;br&gt; the subject line but some other mechanism, and will happily allow the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/d303c2ab8edd2e0c</guid>
  <author>
  chriscm...@gmail.com
  (Chris Muir)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:27:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>which method is standard for primary-key in ADF 11g? (DBSequence or uncheck mandatory for PK in EO)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/962bbcf33ee4437a/a44a31a581822b9a?show_docid=a44a31a581822b9a</link>
  <description>
  Dear All, &lt;br&gt; I want to bring a new discussion about standard way of implementing PK in &lt;br&gt; ADF. &lt;br&gt; I always use DBSEquece for primary key but many are using another way that &lt;br&gt; is: &lt;br&gt; uncheck the mandatory field for the attribute with primary-key in the EO,and &lt;br&gt; ADF in working with null value in pk and suprisingly it is working!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/962bbcf33ee4437a</guid>
  <author>
  amir.kha...@gmail.com
  (amir hosein khanof)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:40:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>The ideal ADF team</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/447427a5adf1a256/838d665f54832fb3?show_docid=838d665f54832fb3</link>
  <description>
  Hi all, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;We&#39;ve been discussing skills and training a couple of times in the &lt;br&gt; group, so I thought it would be a good idea to start a skills list - &lt;br&gt; what are the skills you want on your ADF Dream Team? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Here&#39;s a couple of ideas to get the discussion going: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Java skills &lt;br&gt; Java (as a language - basic skills)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/447427a5adf1a256</guid>
  <author>
  s...@vesterli.com
  (Sten Vesterli)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:31:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Template ADF app - what web.xml error-codes do you include for ADF applications?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/95bbc84203940a0f/5ec6471e9529b26a?show_docid=5ec6471e9529b26a</link>
  <description>
  Hi all &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;At my current client we&#39;ve been working on building an ADF Fusion &lt;br&gt; application template that includes bits &#39;n&#39; bobs required for all of &lt;br&gt; our applications beyond what JDev creates out of the box via the &lt;br&gt; Application Wizard. For example by default we setup our package &lt;br&gt; structures in the Model and ViewController projects (ie. the Model is
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/adf-methodology/browse_frm/thread/95bbc84203940a0f</guid>
  <author>
  chriscm...@gmail.com
  (Chris Muir)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:57:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
