Thanks for your reply, who ever you are... i wasnt trying to sound
offensive or anything by saying that anyone sucks... i was just trying
to maybe post about something a little different. thanks again and,
good luck to you.
On Jun 18, 3:28 am, OZ Mandala <n...@aanet.com.au> wrote:
hey jilsk what would be your ideal next version of the mandala if you
could have it be any way you wanted? like, how many pads would the
kit be and what kind of sounds and all that type of stuff?...as if you
could go out and buy it now in one kit package, what would be in the
box?
On Jun 19, 12:22 am, jilsk <mr.ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, who ever you are... i wasnt trying to sound
> offensive or anything by saying that anyone sucks... i was just trying
> to maybe post about something a little different. thanks again and,
> good luck to you.
> On Jun 18, 3:28 am, OZ Mandala <n...@aanet.com.au> wrote:
hi snick, it seems that not too many people are talking about the v.1s
anymore (maybe a little outdated), i love the stability of the
hardware brain and it serves me well. a new brain with multiple pad
inputs would be pretty cool (and pricey i assume but well worth the
money.)
> hey jilsk what would be your ideal next version of the mandala if you
> could have it be any way you wanted? like, how many pads would the
> kit be and what kind of sounds and all that type of stuff?...as if you
> could go out and buy it now in one kit package, what would be in the
> box?
> On Jun 19, 12:22 am, jilsk <mr.ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for your reply, who ever you are... i wasnt trying to sound
> > offensive or anything by saying that anyone sucks... i was just trying
> > to maybe post about something a little different. thanks again and,
> > good luck to you.
> > On Jun 18, 3:28 am, OZ Mandala <n...@aanet.com.au> wrote:
> > > > On Jun 7, 6:16 pm, jilsk <mr.ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > does anyone know what the word is for any future mandalas? a hardware
> > > > > brain with multiple inputs perhaps? maybe im just dreaming...
> hi snick, it seems that not too many people are talking about the v.1s
> anymore (maybe a little outdated), i love the stability of the
> hardware brain and it serves me well. a new brain with multiple pad
> inputs would be pretty cool (and pricey i assume but well worth the
> money.)
> > hey jilsk what would be your ideal next version of the mandala if you
> > could have it be any way you wanted? like, how many pads would the
> > kit be and what kind of sounds and all that type of stuff?...as if you
> > could go out and buy it now in one kit package, what would be in the
> > box?
> > On Jun 19, 12:22 am, jilsk <mr.ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks for your reply, who ever you are... i wasnt trying to sound
> > > offensive or anything by saying that anyone sucks... i was just trying
> > > to maybe post about something a little different. thanks again and,
> > > good luck to you.
> > > On Jun 18, 3:28 am, OZ Mandala <n...@aanet.com.au> wrote:
> > > > Sorry that I suck so much mate but you could try reading this linkhttp://synesthesiacorp.com/blog/mandala_electronic_drum_set/ and
> > > > also
> > > > the last paragraph in this linkhttp://synesthesiacorp.com/blog/electronic_drum_namm/ > > > > ......I
> > > > think you'll find your answers there...oh and try to be a bit more
> > > > patient when waiting for replies to your posts......Good Luck.
> > > > On Jun 18, 10:30 am, jilsk <mr.ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > you guys suck
> > > > > On Jun 7, 6:16 pm, jilsk <mr.ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > does anyone know what the word is for any future mandalas? a hardware
> > > > > > brain with multiple inputs perhaps? maybe im just dreaming...
|
