Request N-H-P be banned from forum due to Defamatory comments - Random chit-chat

Message from discussion Request N-H-P be banned from forum due to Defamatory comments

dockarl

View profile

More options May 3 2007, 12:50 pm

From: dockarl

Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 19:50:41 -0700

Local: Thurs, May 3 2007 12:50 pm

Subject: Request N-H-P be banned from forum due to Defamatory comments

Forward | Print | View thread | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Actually John, I'm going to take that a step further. I see your
allegation, above, as quite serious, on a personal level.

This is your second warning. I am telling you, straight out, man to
man, for the second time - I am not responsible for the site you refer
to.

Alleging that I am is untrue, and given that this is a public forum,
I'd like you to publicly retract your allegation immediately. I'd also
like to publicly ask that your rights to post on this forum be
retracted, as of now - I think you've gone way too far.

Engaging in a little informed discussion is one thing, making an
allegation about a person that is without factual basis is entirely
another - it's called DEFAMATION, and I'm going to tell you right now
- a defamation case is not a cool thing to get involved with.

These days a person's web history is as good as a resume, and I most
certainly would be upset if a potential employer / business partner
was to come across your allegation above and assume it was true - it
would give them an entirely incorrect view of who I am and what I
stand for.

doc

On May 3, 12:13 pm, dockarl wrote:

> John,

> What the?? I usually don't even bother replying to your barbs as I'm
> too busy, but this one's wrong on so many levels I just have to..

> semi-naked graphics?? What in the hell are you talking about John?

> You think I runwww.naturalhealthperspective.net- Uh-uh - wrong - try
> again. I guess that misconception explains your hate filled comments
> toward me on my personal blog though..

> As I've said before champ, your attitude irritates me - but not enough
> to justify wasting my time writing a blog devoted to you.

> The only time I ever bother engaging you is directly, mostly (like the
> majority around here) for one of the following reasons -

> a) If you attack people of other ethnicities / races / creeds.
> b) If you attack new posters / give poor advice and they assume that's
> the prevailing general attitude around here.

> Strike - when you were on moderation you were actually giving some
> good advice and kicked your abuse habit for a few weeks - it actually
> became pleasant around here again and I felt proud of you - but so
> quickly, you are back to your old habits.

> If you are sick of being hated, why don't you just play nice? As a
> natural health person you should know about that philosophy called
> causality - surely.

> doc

> On May 3, 1:07 am, N-H-P wrote:

> > On May 2, 5:55 am, Volvox777 wrote:

> > > NHP wrote in response to my comment that the NHP.net site is not run
> > > by me

> > I miss read that post. :(

> > You are NOT the hate blogger, because he is NOT mentally unstable:
> > unlike you.

> > I would say that dockarl is the most likely person. Since both have
> > displayed a marked preference for semi-naked female graphics.- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

Forward