What the?? I usually don't even bother replying to your barbs as I'm too busy, but this one's wrong on so many levels I just have to..
semi-naked graphics?? What in the hell are you talking about John?
You think I run www.naturalhealthperspective.net - Uh-uh - wrong - try again. I guess that misconception explains your hate filled comments toward me on my personal blog though..
As I've said before champ, your attitude irritates me - but not enough to justify wasting my time writing a blog devoted to you.
The only time I ever bother engaging you is directly, mostly (like the majority around here) for one of the following reasons -
a) If you attack people of other ethnicities / races / creeds. b) If you attack new posters / give poor advice and they assume that's the prevailing general attitude around here.
Strike - when you were on moderation you were actually giving some good advice and kicked your abuse habit for a few weeks - it actually became pleasant around here again and I felt proud of you - but so quickly, you are back to your old habits.
If you are sick of being hated, why don't you just play nice? As a natural health person you should know about that philosophy called causality - surely.
> What the?? I usually don't even bother replying to your barbs as I'm > too busy, but this one's wrong on so many levels I just have to..
> semi-naked graphics?? What in the hell are you talking about John?
I saw, what I saw. :(
You had some kind of advertisement on your blog regarding females in bikinis. That type of advisement would have offended any sensitive female, but not an insensitive male of that persuasion.
Actually John, I'm going to take that a step further. I see your allegation, above, as quite serious, on a personal level.
This is your second warning. I am telling you, straight out, man to man, for the second time - I am not responsible for the site you refer to.
Alleging that I am is untrue, and given that this is a public forum, I'd like you to publicly retract your allegation immediately. I'd also like to publicly ask that your rights to post on this forum be retracted, as of now - I think you've gone way too far.
Engaging in a little informed discussion is one thing, making an allegation about a person that is without factual basis is entirely another - it's called DEFAMATION, and I'm going to tell you right now - a defamation case is not a cool thing to get involved with.
These days a person's web history is as good as a resume, and I most certainly would be upset if a potential employer / business partner was to come across your allegation above and assume it was true - it would give them an entirely incorrect view of who I am and what I stand for.
> What the?? I usually don't even bother replying to your barbs as I'm > too busy, but this one's wrong on so many levels I just have to..
> semi-naked graphics?? What in the hell are you talking about John?
> You think I runwww.naturalhealthperspective.net- Uh-uh - wrong - try > again. I guess that misconception explains your hate filled comments > toward me on my personal blog though..
> As I've said before champ, your attitude irritates me - but not enough > to justify wasting my time writing a blog devoted to you.
> The only time I ever bother engaging you is directly, mostly (like the > majority around here) for one of the following reasons -
> a) If you attack people of other ethnicities / races / creeds. > b) If you attack new posters / give poor advice and they assume that's > the prevailing general attitude around here.
> Strike - when you were on moderation you were actually giving some > good advice and kicked your abuse habit for a few weeks - it actually > became pleasant around here again and I felt proud of you - but so > quickly, you are back to your old habits.
> If you are sick of being hated, why don't you just play nice? As a > natural health person you should know about that philosophy called > causality - surely.
> doc
> On May 3, 1:07 am, N-H-P wrote:
> > On May 2, 5:55 am, Volvox777 wrote:
> > > NHP wrote in response to my comment that the NHP.net site is not run > > > by me
> > I miss read that post. :(
> > You are NOT the hate blogger, because he is NOT mentally unstable: > > unlike you.
> > I would say that dockarl is the most likely person. Since both have > > displayed a marked preference for semi-naked female graphics.- Hide quoted text -
> If you are sick of being hated, why don't you just play nice? As a > natural health person you should know about that philosophy called > causality - surely.
I believe in always returning the favor. Anybody who publicly trashes me, is going to get trashed back by me. :)
You can search the web for that one. And, bank on it.
> Alleging that I am is untrue, and given that this is a public forum, > I'd like you to publicly retract your allegation immediately. I'd also > like to publicly ask that your rights to post on this forum be > retracted, as of now - I think you've gone way too far.
I saw what I saw on your blog. You apparently think that kind of graphic is normal. I am telling you now, that it is anything but.
> > Alleging that I am is untrue, and given that this is a public forum, > > I'd like you to publicly retract your allegation immediately. I'd also > > like to publicly ask that your rights to post on this forum be > > retracted, as of now - I think you've gone way too far.
> I saw what I saw on your blog. You apparently think that kind of > graphic is normal. I am telling you now, that it is anything but.
LOL - that comment is funny enough in itself...strange how NHP's long record of abuse has created a situation where him saying that someone is not mentally unstable could be viewed as a compliment.
You misread my post? How can you misread "the NHP.net site is not run by me" - I think what you meant to say was "Oops, I guess I did unintentionally pay the NHP.net site creator a compliment" - Ummm - no I guess that wouldn't work either - because in your own little mind you are never wrong.
Oh - and you are calling me mentally unstable - well hello kettle, I am pot - but we are both black.
During the month of April 2007, I received exactly 4,714 referrals from ALL search engines for my main website. Of which, there was only one search made on my name. :)
There was precisely 8 searches for the name of my website. Most of which were probably made by me. :)
And, I am receiving a totally insignificant number of referrals from my WordPress blog. So, it looks like it would be safe to convert it back to poking fun at SEO trolls. Something, that I am very good at. :)
John you are a disgusting old man with a really pathetic attitude to dealing with people here. I don't know why me or anyone else bothers to reply to your utter meaningless crap because you are not human to me, you're barely an entity in this world.
Get a life because right now you are seriously missing one.
> Internal broken links can be a big problem since generally (not > always) your home page has the most pagerank or linking power, with > broken links that power isn't being passed around as efficiently as > possible. Another aspect is that the anchor text of the link has as > much to do with what the page ranks for as the content on the page, > with a broken link you are not sending that important signal to the > page.
> 404s and redirects are all part of a mature site, but they should come > from the outside not from your own internal linking structure. If > you've recently cleaned that up, expect your deeper pages to get a > bump.
> On Mar 16, 9:11 am, N-H-P wrote:
> > On Mar 6, 5:04 am, Natural Health wrote:
> > > This isn't random Chit-Chat when you are the only one taking part in > > > the discussion. It's either only random Chit or random Chat, but not > > > chit-chat.
> > The SERPs indicate that the above blog of mine is in fact doing quite > > well. :)
> > In a couple of months, I should own ALL three (3) keywords that I am > > targeting. Your recent absence; Ha, ... Hah, Ha; should as planned > > pretty well destroy whatever standing your hate blog had in the > > SERPs. :)
> > The current status of my main website is pretty hard to figure out. : > > (
> > In December 2006, at the height of the success of my home page when it > > was in the top ten of the SERPs total referrals to my entire website > > from Google had actually declined by 50% from September 2006. In > > October, total hits to my site declined 25%. By December, another > > 25%. In January, the bottom fell out. But, what ever happened and > > for what ever reason took place over several months. Currently, my > > main website is on the road to recovery as my site statistics are > > steadily improving each month. :)
> > I have cleaned up and fixed all the broken links. Perhaps, that was > > my main problem?
