From: ShoreTel
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 12:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 14 2008 5:36 am
Subject: Re: Phorm/Webwise and robots.txt
> Perhaps as they collect information on my browsing habits they
They don't even need to spider those sites (they wouldn't get past
> also spider the site maybe to find content to match the ads to. password protected sites that way). If they are able to insert <script> tags directly into the datastream to your computer, that means they can read the page as it travels over the network to your computer. How do you think it figured out where the </html> tag was to begin with? On May 13, 4:28 am, webado wrote:
> I had a spat with nebuad a while back when my ISP suddenly started
> adding scripts to some pages served to me (and probably to others of > their users). > At the time the scripts weren't doing anything that I could tell > (unless they were collecting information only), they were only visible > in the source code, added after the </html> tag. Perhaps they needed > yet to be activated from the nebuad end. I only found out by accident > when viewing my source code, I forget why I was looking at it. The > validator never pointed the invalid code out, simply because it was > never getting the script tacked on. > I complained to my ISP, they denied it, but changed my fixed IP to a
> I believe it's still happening on and off on my connection but I've
> I don't think it was in any way tied in to the website I was accessing
> But it's a worrisome prospect when ISP's opt in to such gimmicks.
> On May 13, 5:10 am, jelv wrote:
> > I've raised a similar concern about Phorm here:http://groups.google.co.uk/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Tools/browse_t...
> > Any chance of someone from Google responding? You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||