Can we boycott lazy posters? - Crawling, indexing, and ranking

Message from discussion Can we boycott lazy posters?

JellyBean

View profile

More options May 17, 2:29 am

From: JellyBean

Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:29:48 -0700 (PDT)

Local: Sat, May 17 2008 2:29 am

Subject: Re: Can we boycott lazy posters?

Forward | Print | View thread | Report this message | Find messages by this author

There will be similar questions asked all the time, as it's different
people learning - we all have to start somewhere. To chastise what you
see as 'obvious' questions is like a seasoned driver beeping a learner
who has large L plates on their car. We were are learners once and
have all asked stupid questions, not read guidelines, etc. I learnt
the most from those who were kind enough to politely point me in the
right direction.

On May 16, 4:56 pm, Autocrat wrote:

> ...Robbo... & ...RainboRick
> You're both right really - I shouldn't get so worked up over it...
> but don't you find it juat the slightest bit worrying/annoying/tiring
> that day in and day out it's often the same problem with the same sort
> of responses?

> .

> ...Padaxes...
> How do posters handle people who make assumptions that they are the
> ones being spoken about?
> :D

> If you feel slighted or misunderstand, you simply respond and clarify.

> You'll find that in almost all instances, people are more than fair.
> (in some cases (as shown above), they are even nicer than I am!)

> .
> .

> I think I'm going to go for the 'Canned Responses'.
> It's more than inefficient typing the same thing for every 4th person
> becasue they didn't look at (or couldn't find) something that related.

> I'll get it finished tonight... and post it tonight/tomorrow.
> If others want to make use of it for reporting, feel free 9should help
> save some time/effort and lend a trend of 'formation' to responses.

Forward